Pile design practice in southern Africa Part 2: Implicit reliability of existing practice

Limit state design has become the basis of geotechnical design codes worldwide. With the semi-probabilistic limit state design approach, load and resistance factors of (deterministic) design functions are calibrated on the basis of reliability theory. The calibration is done to obtain procedures that will ensure that a target level of reliability is exceeded under the design conditions within the scope of the design function. This is conventionally expressed in terms of the reliability index (β), which is related to the probability of failure (P f ). Acceptable existing design practice is an important source of information on appropriate levels of reliability. This paper uses the results from a pile load test database to evaluate the reliability levels implied in the current South African pile design approach. The results of the analysis indicate that the reliability index values for ultimate limit state failure of single piles implicit to present design practice vary with the pile class. However, the influence of the probability model applied is more significant. Based on conventional and standardised procedures for reliability analysis, a representative implicit reliability index value β I,Rep 3.5 is obtained, corresponding to a probability of failure P f = 2.10 -4 . The values for various sets of pile conditions range from β I = 3.1 (Pf = 1.10 -3 ) to βI = 4.3 (Pf = 1.10 -5 ). This compares well with target levels of reliability for structural and geotechnical performance of β T = 3.0 as set in SANS 10160-1:2011 Part 1 Basis of structural design. These indicative results provide a useful reference base to establish the reliability of existing and therefore acceptable South African pile design practice. It could also be interpreted as indicative of geotechnical design practice in general. The standard SANS 10160-5:2011 Part 5 Basis for geotechnical design and actions provides the framework for future calibration investigations.

[1]  G. Baecher Reliability and Statistics in Geotechnical Engineering , 2003 .

[2]  Mahongo Dithinde,et al.  Characterisation of Model Uncertainty for Reliability-Based Design of Pile Foundations , 2007 .

[3]  Johan V. Retief,et al.  The limit states basis of structural design for SANS 10160-1 , 2009 .

[4]  Johan V. Retief,et al.  Characterization of Model Uncertainty in the Static Pile Design Formula , 2011 .

[5]  R. V. Milford,et al.  Proposals for a comprehensive limit states formulation for South African structural codes : technical paper , 1987 .

[6]  Milan Holicky,et al.  Reliability analysis for structural design , 2009 .

[7]  R. V. Milford Target safety and SABS 0160 load factors , 1988 .

[8]  John T. Christian,et al.  Geotechnical Engineering Reliability: How Well Do We Know What We Are Doing? , 2004 .

[9]  Dunaiski Pe,et al.  The reliability basis of design for structural resistance , 2007 .

[10]  M. Holicky,et al.  Reliability assessment of alternative Eurocode and South African load combination schemes for structural design : technical paper , 2005 .

[11]  John T. Christian Errata for “Geotechnical Engineering Reliability: How Well Do We Know What We Are Doing?” the 39th Terzaghi Lecture by John T. Christian , 2005 .

[12]  M Dithinde,et al.  Pile design practice in southern Africa Part I: Resistance statistics , 2013 .

[13]  Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.  Reliability-Based Design of Foundations for Transmission Line Structures , 2006 .

[14]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .