Combining Sunitinib and Bevacizumab for the Management of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Phase I/II Trial

Abstract Background Tyrosine kinase inhibitors remain a cornerstone in managing metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The 4 weeks on/2 weeks off intermittent sunitinib schedule could result in rebound angiogenesis and tumor progression in the 2-week rest period. We propose using bevacizumab during this period for continuous antiangiogenic effects. Method This was a phase I/II study of patients with advanced clear cell RCC. Sunitinib was given 50 mg daily on a 4-week on/2-week off schedule. Bevacizumab was given on day 29 of each sunitinib cycle. The bevacizumab starting dose was 5 mg/kg, and the dose was escalated to 10 mg if there was no dose-limiting toxicity. The primary endpoints were response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Twenty-five patients were recruited. The study was closed prematurely because of poor accrual. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed with 5 mg bevacizumab. One patient achieved a complete response, and 12 achieved a partial response (52% response rate). At a median follow-up of 42.2 months (95%, confidence interval (CI) 32.9 to 51.4), the median PFS duration was 16.5 months (95% CI 4.1-28.8), and the median overall survival time was 33.3 months (95% CI 19.4-47.3). Twenty-two patients (88%) had at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicity; the most common were thrombocytopenia (32%), lymphopenia (32%), hypertension (28%), and fatigue (24%). Conclusion Continuous angiogenesis blockade by adding bevacizumab to the sunitinib on/off regimen for advanced RCC yields significant antitumor activity with manageable increased toxicity.

[1]  C. Porta,et al.  Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  C. Porta,et al.  Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  A. Eldali,et al.  Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Sunitinib as First-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in an Arab Population , 2020, JCO global oncology.

[4]  T. Powles,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R. Motzer,et al.  Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  M. Hubbe,et al.  Sunitinib Treatment Modification in First-Line Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of the STAR-TOR Registry , 2018, AntiCancer Research.

[7]  K. Bensalah,et al.  Sunitinib Alone or after Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Bohuslav Melichar,et al.  Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  G. Tortora,et al.  Clinical outcome of patients who reduced sunitinib or pazopanib during first-line treatment for advanced kidney cancer. , 2017, Urologic oncology.

[10]  L. Devine,et al.  Phase I study of safety and tolerability of sunitinib in combination with sirolimus in patients with refractory solid malignancies and determination of VEGF (VEGF-A) and soluble VEGF-R2 (sVEGFR2) in plasma , 2016, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[11]  J. Ahn,et al.  RandomizEd phase II trial of Sunitinib four weeks on and two weeks off versus Two weeks on and One week off in metastatic clear-cell type REnal cell carcinoma: RESTORE trial. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  J. Reeves,et al.  Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Lauren McCann,et al.  A randomised, double-blind phase III study of pazopanib in patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: final overall survival results and safety update. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[14]  E. Jonasch,et al.  Rapid Angiogenesis Onset after Discontinuation of Sunitinib Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  J. Burke,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  J. Patard,et al.  ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Kidney Cancer 2010: treatment of metastatic disease. , 2011, European urology.

[17]  E. Small,et al.  Phase III trial of bevacizumab plus interferon alfa versus interferon alfa monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: final results of CALGB 90206. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  A. Ravaud,et al.  Phase III trial of bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (AVOREN): final analysis of overall survival. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Helen X. Chen,et al.  A Phase I Study of Sunitinib plus Bevacizumab in Advanced Solid Tumors , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  R. Motzer,et al.  Phase I trial of bevacizumab plus escalated doses of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  D. Cella,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with sorafenib versus interferon Alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[23]  C. Verschraegen,et al.  Optimal modeling for phase I design of a two drug combination—results of a phase I study of cisplatin with 9-nitrocamptothecin , 2008, Investigational New Drugs.

[24]  J. Christensen,et al.  Multiple circulating proangiogenic factors induced by sunitinib malate are tumor-independent and correlate with antitumor efficacy , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  John Smeraglia,et al.  Circulating protein biomarkers of pharmacodynamic activity of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: modulation of VEGF and VEGF-related proteins , 2007, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[26]  R. Figlin,et al.  Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  F. Peale,et al.  Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, hypoxia inducible factor 1α, and carbonic anhydrase IX in human tumours , 2004, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[28]  R. A’Hern Sample size tables for exact single‐stage phase II designs , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  C. Conill,et al.  Can Karnofsky performance status be transformed to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scoring scale and vice versa? , 1992, European journal of cancer.