Language statistics explain the spatial–numerical association of response codes

The spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC) has shown that parity judgments with participants’ left hands yield faster response times (RTs) for smaller numbers than for larger numbers, with the opposite result for right-hand responses. These findings have been explained by participants perceptually simulating magnitude on a mental number line. In three RT experiments, we showed that the SNARC effect can also be explained by language statistics. Participants made parity judgments of number words (Exp. 1) and Arabic numerals (Exp. 2). Linguistic frequencies of the number words and numbers mirrored the SNARC effect, explaining aspects of processing that a perceptual simulation account could not. In Experiment 3, we investigated whether high- and low-frequency nonnumerical words would also elicit a SNARC-like effect. Again, RTs were faster for high-frequency words for left-hand responses, with the opposite result for right-hand responses. These results demonstrate that what has only been attributed to perceptual simulation should also be attributed to language statistics.

[1]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words , 1992, Cognition.

[2]  Iain D. Gilchrist,et al.  Testing a Simplified Method for Measuring Velocity Integration in Saccades Using a Manipulation of Target Contrast , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[3]  W Fias,et al.  Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect , 2001, Psychological research.

[4]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Notational Modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (Linguistic Markedness of Response Codes) Effect , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  Takeshi Hatta,et al.  Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[7]  J. Tzelgov,et al.  Expanding on the mental number line: zero is perceived as the "smallest". , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  F. Restle.  Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[9]  Wim Fias,et al.  Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects , 2005 .

[10]  Samar Zebian,et al.  Linkages between Number Concepts, Spatial Thinking, and Directionality of Writing: The SNARC Effect and the REVERSE SNARC Effect in English and Arabic Monoliterates, Biliterates, and Illiterate Arabic Speakers , 2005 .

[11]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line , 1999, Cognition.

[12]  Yang Seok Cho,et al.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  David J. Ostry,et al.  Time course of number magnitude interference during grasping , 2008, Cortex.

[14]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information , 1992 .

[15]  M. Louwerse.  Embodied relations are encoded in language , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Ramon C. Littell,et al.  SAS for Linear Models , 2002 .

[17]  Wim Fias,et al.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.

[18]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  When Digits Help Digits: Spatial–Numerical Associations Point to Finger Counting as Prime Example of Embodied Cognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[19]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies , 1966 .

[20]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Word Frequency Distributions , 2001 .

[21]  S. Shaki,et al.  Cultural Characteristics Dissociate Magnitude and Ordinal Information Processing , 2011 .

[22]  Max M. Louwerse,et al.  Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[23]  M. Louwerse,et al.  The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing , 2010, Cognition.

[24]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches , 2008 .

[25]  M. Damian.  Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Michael E. R. Nicholls,et al.  Size Matters: Non-Numerical Magnitude Affects the Spatial Coding of Response , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[28]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[29]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  It takes just one word to quash a SNARC. , 2009, Experimental psychology.