Fairness or discrimination in intergroup behaviour? a reply to Branthwaite, Doyle and Lightbown

Branthwaite, Doyle and Lightbown (1979) argue that minimal intergroup behaviour represents a compromise or balance between fairness and discrimination, that fairness and discrimination are opposed, generic norms of intergroup relations and that one factor affecting their relative weight is status position since, apparently, different status groups attempt to equalize their positions by varying the degree to which they are fair or discriminatory. This reply reviews evidence to show that minimal groups are never fair but always discriminatory to varying degrees and that a generic norm of intergroup fairness is unnecessary to explain why that discrimination rarely approaches maximum. It also argues that the concept of opposed, generic norms has neither empirical nor theoretical value. Finally, it cites findings that the basic tendency in intergroup behaviour is not to equalize but to accentuate evaluative differences between groups (whether of similar or different status) in favour of the ingroup.

[1]  R. R. Blake,et al.  Reactions to Intergroup Competition Under Win-Lose Conditions , 1961 .

[2]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour , 1975 .

[3]  H. Kelley,et al.  SIGNIFICANT FACTORS IN OVEREVALUATION OF OWN-GROUP'S PRODUCT. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  Children and Race , 1976 .

[5]  George W. Baxter Prejudiced Liberals? , 1973 .

[6]  E. Krausz,et al.  Group Conflict and Cooperation: Their Social Psychology , 1968 .

[7]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[8]  W. Lambert,et al.  Inter-ethnic group competition and levels of aspiration. , 1971 .

[9]  J. Hatton Reactions of Negroes in a biracial bargaining situation. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  H. Tajfel Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[11]  J. M. Rabbie,et al.  Intergroup competition and its effect on intragroup and intergroup relations , 1971 .

[12]  Gérard Lemaine Social differentiation and social originality , 1974 .

[13]  W. Wilson,et al.  Intergroup attitudes and strategies in games between opponents of the same or of a different race. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  A. Branthwaite,et al.  Fairness and discrimination: English versus Welsh , 1975 .

[15]  Douglas Cederblom,et al.  Effects of Race and Strategy in the Prisoner's Dilemma (PD) , 1970 .

[16]  B. Commins,et al.  The effects of status differences, favoured treatment and equity on intergroup comparisons , 1979 .

[17]  M. Billig Normative communication in a minimal intergroup situation , 1973 .

[18]  R. Epstein Aggression toward outgroups as a function of authoritarianism and imitation of aggressive models. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  O. J. Harvey An Experimental Investigation of Negative and Positive Relations Between Small Groups Through Judgmental Indices , 1956 .

[20]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Familiarity and categorization in intergroup behavior , 1974 .

[21]  Y. Yinon,et al.  Retaliatory aggression in individuals and groups , 1979 .

[22]  M. Brewer,et al.  Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics , 1978 .

[23]  Howard Giles,et al.  Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations , 1980 .

[24]  G. Vaughan Social change and intergroup preferences in New Zealand , 1978 .

[25]  M. Brewer In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[26]  A. Branthwaite,et al.  The balance between fairness and discrimination , 1979 .

[27]  V. L. Allen,et al.  Categorization, belief similarity, and intergroup discrimination , 1975 .

[28]  W. Doise Paris,et al.  An experimental investigation into the formation of intergroup representations , 1972 .

[29]  H. Lefcourt,et al.  THE EFFECT OF REFERENCE GROUP UPON NEGROES TASK PERSISTENCE IN A BIRACIAL COMPETITIVE GAME. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour , 1973 .

[31]  J. Nuttin,et al.  Frequency perception of individual and group successes as a function of competition, coaction, and isolation. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  David A. Wilder,et al.  Reduction of Intergroup Discrimination through Individuation of the Out-Group. , 1978 .

[33]  W. Doise,et al.  The categorisation process in intergroup relations , 1973 .

[34]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism , 1979 .

[35]  H. Davis,et al.  Evaluative bias in group and individual competition. , 1970, Journal of Social Psychology.

[36]  G. Dunteman,et al.  Biases in the evaluation of one's own group, its allies and opponents , 1963 .

[37]  W. Doise,et al.  Groups and Individuals: Explanations in Social Psychology , 1978 .

[38]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive? , 1980 .

[39]  H. Hornstein Promotive Tension: The Basis of Prosocial Behavior from a Lewinian Perspective1 , 1972 .

[40]  Rupert Brown,et al.  The Criss‐cross Categorization Effect in intergroup discrimination , 1979 .

[41]  N. Miller,et al.  Shifts in evaluations of participants following intergroup competition. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.