— To date, there are no well-established and few valid candidate methods to evaluate motion artifacts, although a number of organizations are working to come to agreement on ways to characterize, analyze, and quantify them. The LCD-TV market has vested interest to improve performance with regard to motion artifacts, since: (1) LCDs are quite susceptible to many types of motion distortions, (2)most of its primary content has motion, and (3) they can be very noticeable and objectionable to even a casual viewer. This paper is an overview of motion artifacts, and the work of the VESA FPDM (flat panel display measurements standard) group both to update FPDM to FPDM3 and to standardize methods to evaluate motion artifacts.
[1]
Stefan Winkler,et al.
Issues in vision modeling for perceptual video quality assessment
,
1999,
Signal Process..
[2]
A B Watson,et al.
Efficiency of a model human image code.
,
1987,
Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[3]
Yoshifumi Shimodaira,et al.
31.1: Invited Paper: Fundamental Phenomena Underlying Artifacts Induced by Image Motion and the Solutions for Decreasing the Artifacts on FPDs
,
2003
.
[4]
Scott J. Daly,et al.
Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity
,
1992,
Electronic Imaging.