Variation among species in proteomic sulphur content is related to environmental conditions

The elemental composition of proteins influences the quantities of different elements required by organisms. Here, we considered variation in the sulphur content of whole proteomes among 19 Archaea, 122 Eubacteria and 10 eukaryotes whose genomes have been fully sequenced. We found that different species vary greatly in the sulphur content of their proteins, and that average sulphur content of proteomes and genome base composition are related. Forces contributing to variation in proteomic sulphur content appear to operate quite uniformly across the proteins of different species. In particular, the sulphur content of orthologous proteins was frequently correlated with mean proteomic sulphur contents. Among prokaryotes, proteomic sulphur content tended to be greater in anaerobes, relative to non-anaerobes. Thermophiles tended to have lower proteomic sulphur content than non-thermophiles, consistent with the thermolability of cysteine and methionine residues. This work suggests that persistent environmental growth conditions can influence the evolution of elemental composition of whole proteomes in a manner that may have important implications for the amount of sulphur used by living organisms to build proteins. It extends previous studies that demonstrated links between transient changes in environmental conditions and the elemental composition of subsets of proteins expressed under these conditions.

[1]  R. Fleischmann,et al.  The complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic, sulphate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Takashi Gojobori,et al.  Metabolic efficiency and amino acid composition in the proteomes of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  P. Hraber,et al.  Global similarities in nucleotide base composition among disparate functional classes of single-stranded RNA imply adaptive evolutionary convergence. , 1996, RNA.

[4]  Fredj Tekaia,et al.  Amino acid composition of genomes, lifestyles of organisms, and evolutionary trends: a global picture with correspondence analysis. , 2002, Gene.

[5]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[6]  H. Burd,et al.  Abundance of 4Fe-4S motifs in the genomes of methanogens and other prokaryotes. , 2004, FEMS microbiology letters.

[7]  N. D. Pidgen,et al.  The Comparative Method , 1987 .

[8]  C R Woese,et al.  Erratum: The complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic, sulphate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus , 1998, Nature.

[9]  J. Mortimer,et al.  Optimum growth temperature and the base composition of open reading frames in prokaryotes , 2003, Extremophiles.

[10]  D. Kelly,et al.  The prokaryotes: an evolving electronic resource for the microbiological community - , 2002 .

[11]  Hugo Naya,et al.  Aerobiosis Increases the Genomic Guanine Plus Cytosine Content (GC%) in Prokaryotes , 2002, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[12]  Y. Mechulam,et al.  Methionine as translation start signal: a review of the enzymes of the pathway in Escherichia coli. , 1993, Biochimie.

[13]  D. Gatherer,et al.  Nitrogen-fixing aerobic bacteria have higher genomic GC content than non-fixing species within the same genus. , 2004, Hereditas.

[14]  Larry L. Barton,et al.  Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria , 1995, Biotechnology Handbooks.

[15]  G. Singer,et al.  Genomic and proteomic adaptations to growth at high temperature , 2004, Genome Biology.

[16]  E. Stadtman,et al.  Protein Oxidation in Aging, Disease, and Oxidative Stress* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  D. Penny The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1992 .

[18]  D. Lipman,et al.  A genomic perspective on protein families. , 1997, Science.

[19]  S. Karlin,et al.  Chance and statistical significance in protein and DNA sequence analysis. , 1992, Science.

[20]  G. Taylor,et al.  CITRATE SYNTHASE FROM PYROCOCCUS FURIOSUS , 1997 .

[21]  P. Marlière,et al.  Molecular Evolution of Protein Atomic Composition , 2001, Science.

[22]  Philippe Marlière,et al.  Adaptive eradication of methionine and cysteine from cyanobacterial light-harvesting proteins , 1989, Nature.

[23]  G. Singer,et al.  Thermophilic prokaryotes have characteristic patterns of codon usage, amino acid composition and nucleotide content. , 2003, Gene.

[24]  R. Amann,et al.  The genome of Desulfotalea psychrophila, a sulfate-reducing bacterium from permanently cold Arctic sediments. , 2004, Environmental microbiology.

[25]  L. Barton,et al.  Characteristics and Activities of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria , 1995 .

[26]  J. Wells,et al.  Gram-Positive Bacteria , 1997, Biotechnology Intelligence Unit.

[27]  Michel Werner,et al.  Sulfur sparing in the yeast proteome in response to sulfur demand. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[28]  Philippe Marlière,et al.  Intimate Evolution of Proteins , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  Simon A. A. Travers,et al.  Does a tree–like phylogeny only exist at the tips in the prokaryotes? , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[31]  Jason G. Bragg,et al.  Nitrogen versus carbon use in prokaryotic genomes and proteomes , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  P. Casey,et al.  Evidence for a Catalytic Role of Zinc in Protein Farnesyltransferase , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Rekha Seshadri,et al.  The genome sequence of the anaerobic, sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  L. J. Perry,et al.  The Genomics of Disulfide Bonding and Protein Stabilization in Thermophiles , 2005, PLoS biology.