Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms.

Trading of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions is an attractive approach to help producers implement cleaner treatment technologies to replace current anaerobic lagoons. Our objectives were to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions from implementation of aerobic technology in USA swine farms. Emission reductions were calculated using the approved United Nations framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC) methodology in conjunction with monitoring information collected during full-scale demonstration of the new treatment system in a 4360-head swine operation in North Carolina (USA). Emission sources for the project and baseline manure management system were methane (CH4) emissions from the decomposition of manure under anaerobic conditions and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions during storage and handling of manure in the manure management system. Emission reductions resulted from the difference between total project and baseline emissions. The project activity included an on-farm wastewater treatment system consisting of liquid-solid separation, treatment of the separated liquid using aerobic biological N removal, chemical disinfection and soluble P removal using lime. The project activity was completed with a centralized facility that used aerobic composting to process the separated solids. Replacement of the lagoon technology with the cleaner aerobic technology reduced GHG emissions 96.9%, from 4972 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-eq) to 153 tonnes CO2-eq/year. Total net emission reductions by the project activity in the 4360-head finishing operation were 4776.6 tonnes CO2-eq per year or 1.10 tonnes CO2-eq/head per year. The dollar value from implementation of this project in this swine farm was US$19,106/year using current Chicago Climate Exchange trading values of US$4/t CO2. This translates into a direct economic benefit to the producer of US$1.75 per finished pig. Thus, GHG emission reductions and credits can help compensate for the higher installation cost of cleaner aerobic technologies and facilitate producer adoption of environmentally superior technologies to replace current anaerobic lagoons in the USA.

[1]  Katherine E. Seiferlein.  Annual Energy Review 2005 , 2006 .

[2]  Viney P. Aneja,et al.  Characterization of atmospheric ammonia emissions from swine waste storage and treatment lagoons , 2000 .

[3]  J. Penman,et al.  Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories CH 4 Emissions from Solid Waste Disposal 419 CH 4 EMISSIONS FROM SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL , 2022 .

[4]  Patrick G Hunt,et al.  Development of environmentally superior treatment system to replace anaerobic swine lagoons in the USA. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[5]  B. Dawson,et al.  UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (UNFCCC) , 2008 .

[6]  Patrick G. Hunt,et al.  Nitrification treatment of swine wastewater with acclimated nitrifying sludge immobilized in polymer pellets , 2000 .

[7]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[8]  John H. Loughrin,et al.  Reduction of malodorous compounds from a treated swine anaerobic lagoon. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[9]  Patrick G. Hunt,et al.  SOLID–LIQUID SEPARATION OF FLUSHED SWINE MANURE WITH PAM: EFFECT OF WASTEWATER STRENGTH , 2002 .

[10]  E. Alocilja,et al.  PATHOGENS IN ANIMAL WASTES AND THE IMPACTS OF WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THEIR SURVIVAL, TRANSPORT AND FATE , 2006 .

[11]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[12]  Ariel A. Szogi,et al.  Aerobic Composting of Swine Manure Solids Mixed with Cotton Gin Waste , 2006 .

[13]  George Tchobanoglous,et al.  Wastewater Engineering Treatment Disposal Reuse , 1972 .

[14]  D. Kruger,et al.  Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories , 2000 .

[15]  J. Hatfield,et al.  Emissions from livestock and manure management. , 2006 .

[16]  Michael A. Mallin,et al.  Impacts of Industrial Animal Production on Rivers and Estuaries , 2000 .

[17]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[18]  End Use.  Annual energy review , 1984 .

[19]  Ariel A. Szogi,et al.  REDUCTION OF AMMONIA EMISSIONS FROM TREATED ANAEROBIC SWINE LAGOONS , 2006 .