On the origin of the toughness of mineralized tissue: microcracking or crack bridging?

Two major mechanisms that could potentially be responsible for toughening in mineralized tissues, such as bone and dentin, have been identified-microcracking and crack bridging. While evidence has been reported for both mechanisms, there has been no consensus thus far on which mechanism plays the dominant role in toughening these materials. In the present study, we seek to present definitive experimental evidence supporting crack bridging, rather than microcracking, as the most significant mechanism of toughening in cortical bone and dentin. In vitro fracture toughness experiments were conducted to measure the variation of the fracture resistance with crack extension [resistance-curve (R-curve) behavior] for both materials with special attention paid to changes in the sample compliance. Because these two toughening mechanisms induce opposite effects on the sample compliance, such experiments allow for the definitive determination of the dominant toughening mechanism, which in the present study was found to be crack bridging for microstructurally large crack sizes. The results of this work are of relevance from the perspective of developing a micromechanistic framework for understanding fracture behavior of mineralized tissue and in predicting failure in vivo.

[1]  R O Ritchie,et al.  Effect of orientation on the in vitro fracture toughness of dentin: the role of toughening mechanisms. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[2]  W. Hayes,et al.  The fracture mechanics of fatigue crack propagation in compact bone. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  Robert O. Ritchie,et al.  Crack-Size Effects on Cyclic and Monotonic Crack Growth in Polycrystalline Alumina: Quantification of the Role of Grain Bridging , 2004 .

[4]  Bernard Budiansky,et al.  Seismic velocities in dry and saturated cracked solids , 1974 .

[5]  M. Kachanov,et al.  Mechanics of crack—microcrack interactions , 1990 .

[6]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Fracture process zone in cementitious materials , 1991 .

[7]  T M Keaveny,et al.  Effects of porous coating and collar support on early load transfer for a cementless hip prosthesis. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  D Vashishth,et al.  Crack growth resistance in cortical bone: concept of microcrack toughening. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  W C Hayes,et al.  Compact bone fatigue damage: a microscopic examination. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Y. Mai,et al.  General method for determination of crack-interface bridging stresses , 1992 .

[11]  R O Ritchie,et al.  Crack blunting, crack bridging and resistance-curve fracture mechanics in dentin: effect of hydration. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[12]  L. Sigl Microcrack toughening in brittle materials containing weak and strong interfaces , 1996 .

[13]  P Zioupos,et al.  Changes in the stiffness, strength, and toughness of human cortical bone with age. , 1998, Bone.

[14]  R. Ritchie Mechanisms of fatigue crack propagation in metals, ceramics and composites: Role of crack tip shielding☆ , 1988 .

[15]  J. Currey,et al.  The Mechanical Properties of Bone , 1970, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  R. Heaney,et al.  Is the paradigm shifting? , 2003, Bone.

[17]  A. Evans,et al.  On the toughening of ceramics by strong reinforcements , 1986 .

[18]  D. Fyhrie,et al.  A rate-dependent microcrack-bridging model that can explain the strain rate dependency of cortical bone apparent yield strength. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  D Vashishth,et al.  Contribution, development and morphology of microcracking in cortical bone during crack propagation. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone , 2003, Nature materials.

[21]  A. Evans Perspective on the Development of High‐Toughness Ceramics , 1990 .

[22]  A. Evans,et al.  Crack‐Growth Resistance of Microcracking Brittle Materials , 2006 .

[23]  M Martens,et al.  Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  Ashok Saxena,et al.  Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens , 1978 .

[25]  R. Ritchie Mechanisms of fatigue-crack propagation in ductile and brittle solids , 1999 .

[26]  Bill Kahler,et al.  Fracture-toughening mechanisms responsible for differences in work to fracture of hydrated and dehydrated dentine. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  T. Fett Influence of bridging stresses on specimen compliances , 1996 .

[28]  D Vashishth,et al.  Experimental validation of a microcracking-based toughening mechanism for cortical bone. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Crack bridging by uncracked ligaments during fatigue-crack growth in SiC-reinforced aluminum-alloy composites , 1989 .

[30]  John W. Hutchinson,et al.  Crack tip shielding by micro-cracking in brittle solids , 1987 .

[31]  W. Bonfield,et al.  Orientation dependence of the fracture mechanics of cortical bone. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  R. Ritchie,et al.  On the fracture of human dentin: is it stress- or strain-controlled? , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[33]  Giuseppe Pezzotti,et al.  Study of the toughening mechanisms in bone and biomimetic hydroxyapatite materials using Raman microprobe spectroscopy. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[34]  J. Katz,et al.  The structure and biomechanics of bone. , 1980, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[35]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Fatigue crack propagation in ARALL® LAMINATES: Measurement of the effect of crack-tip shielding from crack bridging , 1989 .

[36]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Fatigue damage-fracture mechanics interaction in cortical bone. , 2002, Bone.

[37]  S. Stover,et al.  Equine cortical bone exhibits rising R-curve fracture mechanics. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.