Simulation Decomposition: New Approach For Better Simulation Analysis Of Multi-Variable Investment Projects

This paper presents a new method to enhance simulation-based analysis of complex investments that contain multi-variable uncertainty. The method is called “simulation decomposition”. Typically the result of simulation-based investment analysis is in the form of histogram distributions - here we propose a method for first classifying the possible outcomes of selected uncertain variables into states and then using combinations of the created states in the decomposition of the simulated distribution into a number of sub-distributions. The sub-distributions that can be matched to state-combinations of the variables contain relevant actionable information that helps managers in decision-making with regards to the studied investments. A numerical illustration of a renewable energy investment is used to demonstrate the usability, the enhanced analytical power, and the intuitively understandable benefits that can be reached by using the simulation decomposition method. The proposed method is generally usable and can be utilized independent of the investment context.

[1]  Campbell R. Harvey,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field , 1999 .

[2]  Edward G. Anderson,et al.  Evaluating system dynamics models of risky projects using decision trees: alternative energy projects as an illustrative example , 2010 .

[3]  Nicole Propst Real Options Managing Strategic Investment In An Uncertain World , 2016 .

[4]  Mikael Collan,et al.  Analyzing operational real options in metal mining investments with a system dynamic model , 2017 .

[5]  Harriet Black Nembhard,et al.  A real options design for product outsourcing , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[6]  Scott H. Mathews,et al.  European Real Options: An Intuitive Algorithm for the Black-Scholes Formula , 2005 .

[7]  Philippine de T’Serclaes,et al.  Wind farm investment risks under uncertain CDM benefit in China , 2010 .

[8]  Mariia Kozlova Analyzing the Effects of the New Renewable Energy Policy in Russia on Investments into Wind, Solar and Small Hydro Power , 2015 .

[9]  P. Boyle Options: A Monte Carlo approach , 1977 .

[10]  Manuel Monjas-Barroso,et al.  Valuation of projects for power generation with renewable energy: A comparative study based on real regulatory options , 2013 .

[11]  Stanley B. Block Are “Real Options” Actually Used in the Real World? , 2007 .

[12]  Luiz E. Brandão,et al.  Valuing the switching flexibility of the ethanol-gas flex fuel car , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[13]  Trine Krogh Boomsma,et al.  Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Bernadette O’Regan,et al.  Using system dynamics to model the interaction between environmental and economic factors in the mining industry , 2006 .

[15]  M. Lopez-Vallejo,et al.  A CAD framework for the characterization and use of memristor models , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Synthesis, Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Methods and Applications to Circuit Design (SMACD).

[16]  Sanica Bhele,et al.  Interobserver variation is a significant limitation in the diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma , 2014, Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology.

[17]  Mikael Collan,et al.  Modeling the effects of the new Russian capacity mechanism on renewable energy investments , 2016 .

[18]  Justin Ridlehoover APPLYING MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND RISK ANALYSIS TO THE FACILITY LOCATION PROBLEM , 2004 .

[19]  Carsten Drebenstedt,et al.  A Prototype Decision Making Tool of Coal Mine Planning Using System Dynamics Model , 2014 .

[20]  S. Fuss,et al.  Investment in wind power and pumped storage in a real options model , 2012 .

[21]  Anatole Boute Promoting Renewable Energy through Capacity Markets: An Analysis of the Russian Support Scheme , 2012 .

[22]  Sebastian Jaimungal,et al.  Incorporating Managerial Information into Real Option Valuation , 2011 .

[23]  David N. Ford,et al.  Using System Dynamics to Extend Real Options Use : Insights from the Oil & Gas Industry , 2006 .

[24]  Iain MacGill,et al.  A Monte Carlo based decision-support tool for assessing generation portfolios in future carbon constrained electricity industries , 2012 .

[25]  Satu Viljainen,et al.  RES support in Russia: Impact on capacity and electricity market prices , 2015 .

[26]  Bernadette O’Regan,et al.  A System Dynamics Model of Mining Industry Investment Decisions within the Context of Environmental Policy , 2001 .

[27]  Blake Johnson,et al.  A Practical Method for Valuing Real Options: The Boeing Approach , 2007 .

[28]  Atul Sheel,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations and scenario analysis — Decision-making tools for hoteliers , 1995 .