An ROI Ed-Biz Approach for Deploying Mobile Pedagogy

The long history and short past of online distance education is posited as a precursor to the monumental changes revolutionizing global educational activity. The author argues for the use of Mobile Pedagogy as an idiom for the inclusive nature of the platforms, processes, teaching methodologies, and infrastructures (technical and instructional) that comprise this new approach in the world of learning. As such, this chapter discusses the critical element of finances by looking at contemporary learning theory and a specific E-learning system model termed CADRE (Content, Access, Distribution, Revenue, and Evaluation). To help delineate connections between elements in this emerging ecosystem the important component of cost is used as exemplar. As the cost of Higher Education rises, answers to questions long been taken for granted have come to the forefront of the concern for parents and students: Is College worth the cost? Are expensive elite schools a guarantee to entry into the world of work? Are the opportunity costs for a four year (or more) degree program worth the investment? These questions are examined in the context of an ROI (Return on Investment) conjecture that assumes benefits must outweigh costs in order to be worthwhile. In the era of Open Courseware, free courses, MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses), and teaching and learning anytime, anywhere by anybody the issues of cost, quality, sustainability and evaluation are addressed within the context of an educational-business (Ed-Biz) framework. Various strategies relating to the kinds of monetization that could support these directions are offered.

[1]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  Investment in Education , 1989 .

[2]  G. Psacharopoulos Returns to investment in education: A global update , 1994 .

[3]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Are the costs of 'free' too high in online education? , 2013, CACM.

[4]  Agnes Kukulska-Hulme Limelight on Mobile Learning: Integrating Education and Innovation , 2013 .

[5]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Exploring Technology-Mediated Learning from a Pedagogical Perspective , 2003, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[6]  Jennifer W. Spencer,et al.  Firms' knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry , 2003 .

[7]  Gary W. Matkin Open Educational Resources in the Post MOOC Era , 2013, ELERN.

[8]  L. Paldy MOOCs in Your Future , 2013 .

[9]  Van Dusen,et al.  The Virtual Campus: Technology and Reform in Higher Education. ERIC Digest. , 1997 .

[10]  A. Krueger,et al.  Estimating the Payoff to Attending a More Selective College: An Application of Selection on Observables and Unobservables , 2002 .

[11]  Deborah G. Tatar,et al.  Designing Networked Handheld Devices to Enhance School Learning , 2007, Adv. Comput..

[12]  Jef Moonen,et al.  Simplified Return-on-Investment , 2003, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[13]  Thomas R. Ramage A System-Level Comparison of Cost-Efficiency and Return on Investment Related to Online Course Delivery , 2005 .

[14]  Bjorn Hassler,et al.  Bridging the Bandwidth Gap: Open Educational Resources and the Digital Divide , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[15]  David Lebow,et al.  Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset , 1993 .

[16]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Disruptive Pedagogies and Technologies in Universities , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[17]  Brit Toven-Lindsey,et al.  The Open Courseware Movement in Higher Education: Unmasking Power and Raising Questions about the Movement's Democratic Potential , 2013 .

[18]  W. Tastle,et al.  E-Learning in Higher Education: The Challenge, Effort, and Return on Investment , 2005 .