Hit from both sides: tracking industrial and volcanic plumes in Mexico City with surface measurements and OMI SO 2 retrievals during the MILAGRO field campaign

Abstract. Large sulfur dioxide plumes were measured in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area (MCMA) during the MILAGRO field campaign. This paper seeks to identify the sources of these plumes and the meteorological processes that affect their dispersion in a complex mountain basin. Surface measurements of SO2 and winds are analysed in combination with radar wind profiler data to identify transport directions. Satellite retrievals of vertical SO2 columns from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) reveal the dispersion from both the Tula industrial complex and the Popocatepetl volcano. Oversampling the OMI swath data to a fine grid (3 by 3 km) and averaging over the field campaign yielded a high resolution image of the average plume transport. Numerical simulations are used to identify possible transport scenarios. The analysis suggests that both Tula and Popocatepetl contribute to SO2 levels in the MCMA, sometimes on the same day due to strong vertical wind shear. During the field campaign, model estimates suggest that the volcano accounts for about one tenth of the SO2 in the MCMA, with a roughly equal split for the rest between urban sources and the Tula industrial complex. The evaluation of simulations with known sources and pollutants suggests that the combination of observations and meteorological models will be useful in identifying sources and transport processes of other plumes observed during MILAGRO.

[1]  Walter Zimmer,et al.  Satellite-based detection of volcanic sulphur dioxide from recent eruptions in Central and South America , 2008 .

[2]  M. Molina,et al.  Mexico City basin wind circulation during the MCMA-2003 field campaign , 2005 .

[3]  T. Castro,et al.  Characterization of size-differentiated inorganic composition of aerosols in Mexico City , 2003 .

[4]  G. Raga,et al.  On the evolution of aerosol properties at a mountain site above Mexico City , 2000 .

[5]  R. Volkamer,et al.  Modelling constraints on the emission inventory and on vertical dispersion for CO and SO 2 in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area using Solar FTIR and zenith sky UV spectroscopy , 2006 .

[6]  B. de Foy,et al.  Rapid ventilation of the Mexico City basin and regional fate of the urban plume , 2006 .

[7]  Arlin J. Krueger,et al.  Improving retrieval of volcanic sulfur dioxide from backscattered UV satellite observations , 2009 .

[8]  S. Madronich,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol single scattering albedo at ultraviolet wavelengths at the T1 site during MILAGRO , 2009 .

[9]  J. O'Brien,et al.  A Note on the Vertical Structure of the Eddy Exchange Coefficient in the Planetary Boundary Layer , 1970 .

[10]  G. Raga,et al.  On the Composition of Airborne Particles Influenced by Emissions of the Volcano Popocatépetl in Mexico , 2004 .

[11]  John S. Kain,et al.  The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update , 2004 .

[12]  G. Zängl,et al.  Numerical Simulations of the Foehn in the Rhine Valley on 24 October 1999 (MAP IOP 10) , 2004 .

[13]  Steffen Beirle,et al.  Satellite observations of atmospheric SO2 from volcanic eruptions during the time-period of 1996–2002 , 2004 .

[14]  Claudia Rivera,et al.  Tula industrial complex (Mexico) emissions of SO 2 and NO 2 during the MCMA 2006 field campaign using a mobile mini-DOAS system , 2009 .

[15]  M. Molina,et al.  Distinct wind convergence patterns in the Mexico City basin due to the interaction of the gap winds with the synoptic flow , 2006 .

[16]  Xiaoyang Zhang,et al.  Estimating emissions from fires in North America for air quality modeling , 2006 .

[17]  E. Kassianov,et al.  The T1-T2 study: evolution of aerosol properties downwind of Mexico City , 2020 .

[18]  N Oreskes,et al.  Evaluation (not validation) of quantitative models. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[19]  Kai Yang,et al.  Band residual difference algorithm for retrieval of SO/sub 2/ from the aura ozone monitoring instrument (OMI) , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  J. Barnard,et al.  © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics A meteorological overview of the MILAGRO field campaigns , 2007 .

[21]  B. de Foy,et al.  Satellite-derived land surface parameters for mesoscale modelling of the Mexico City basin , 2005 .

[22]  David Capel,et al.  Image Mosaicing and Super-resolution , 2004, Distinguished Dissertations.

[23]  Brittany McClure,et al.  Validation of SO2 Retrievals from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument over NE China , 2008 .

[24]  Aron Jazcilevich,et al.  Locally induced surface air confluence by complex terrain and its effects on air pollution in the valley of Mexico , 2005 .

[25]  J. Bossert.  An Investigation of Flow Regimes Affecting the Mexico City Region , 1995 .

[26]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Characterization of ambient aerosols in Mexico City during the MCMA-2003 campaign with Aerosol Mass Spectrometry: results from the CENICA Supersite , 2006 .

[27]  Louisa Emmons,et al.  © Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Fast airborne aerosol size and chemistry measurements above , 2008 .

[28]  Arlin J. Krueger,et al.  Retrieval of large volcanic SO2 columns from the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument: Comparison and limitations , 2007 .

[29]  Hugo Delgado-Granados,et al.  SO 2 emissions from Popocatépetl volcano: emission rates and plume imaging using optical remote sensing techniques , 2008 .

[30]  G. Raga,et al.  Evidence for volcanic influence on Mexico City aerosols , 1999 .

[31]  Jordan G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2 , 2005 .

[32]  E. Atlas,et al.  Emissions from biomass burning in the Yucatan , 2009 .

[33]  Alexandre Boucher,et al.  Geostatistical Solutions for Super-Resolution Land Cover Mapping , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[34]  J. Allan,et al.  Evolution of anthropogenic pollution at the top of the regional mixed layer in the central Mexico plateau , 2009 .

[35]  N. Sánchez,et al.  Sulfur dioxide emissions from Popocatépetl volcano (Mexico): case study of a high-emission rate, passively degassing erupting volcano , 2001 .

[36]  Arlin J. Krueger,et al.  Sulfur dioxide emissions from Peruvian copper smelters detected by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument , 2007 .

[37]  A. Martínez-Arroyo,et al.  Measurement of aerosol particles, gases and flux radiation in the Pico de Orizaba National Park, and its relationship to air pollution transport , 2005 .

[38]  J. Dudhia,et al.  A New Vertical Diffusion Package with an Explicit Treatment of Entrainment Processes , 2006 .

[39]  Jian Wang,et al.  The time evolution of aerosol composition over the Mexico City plateau , 2007 .

[40]  S. C. O T,et al.  Mobile Laboratory with Rapid Response Instruments for Real-Time Measurements of Urban and Regional Trace Gas and Particulate Distributions and Emission Source Characteristics , 2022 .

[41]  K. Taylor.  Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram , 2001 .

[42]  L. Molina,et al.  Basin-scale wind transport during the MILAGRO field campaign and comparison to climatology using cluster analysis , 2007 .

[43]  Feng Li,et al.  Superresolution Reconstruction of Multispectral Data for Improved Image Classification , 2009, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[44]  J. Allan,et al.  Physical and chemical properties of the regional mixed layer of Mexico's Megapolis , 2009 .

[45]  C. Willmott.  Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance , 1982 .

[46]  S. Zhong,et al.  Meteorological factors associated with inhomogeneous ozone concentrations within the Mexico City basin , 1998 .

[47]  A. Juarez,et al.  Impact of the Popocatepetl’s volcanic activity on the air quality of Puebla City, México , 2005 .

[48]  E. Jáuregui.  Local wind and air pollution interaction in the Mexico basin , 1988 .

[49]  J. Chow,et al.  Spatial Differences in Outdoor PM10 Mass and Aerosol Composition in Mexico City , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[50]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Air quality in North America's most populous city - overview of the MCMA-2003 campaign , 2007 .

[51]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[52]  L. Molina,et al.  Evaluation of WRF mesoscale simulations and particle trajectory analysis for the MILAGRO field campaign , 2009 .

[53]  J. Smith,et al.  Measurements of Mexico City nanoparticle size distributions: Observations of new particle formation and growth , 2004 .

[54]  Gerald E. Streit,et al.  Development and testing of meteorology and air dispersion models for Mexico City , 1995 .