An ensemble of models for integrating dependent sources of information for the prognosis of the remaining useful life of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Abstract This paper presents a prognostic approach based on an ensemble of two degradation indicators for the prediction of the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) stack. When the fuel cell stack experiences variable operating conditions, degradation indicators, such as the stack voltage and the stack State Of Health (SOH), are not able to individually provide precise and robust RUL predictions. The stack voltage does not directly measure the component degradation, as it is only related to degradation symptoms, which are significantly affected by operating conditions. The SOH provides aging information but it can only be measured at low frequency in industrial applications. The objective of this work is to combine the two indicators, leveraging their strengths and overcoming their drawbacks. Two different physics-based models are used to this aim: the first model receives a signal directly observable and related to the stack voltage, which can be frequently and easily measured; the second model is fed by periodic measurements from the physical characterization of the stack, which gives reliable information on the SOH evolution. The prognostic procedure is implemented using Particle Filtering (PF), and the outcomes of the two prognostic filters are aggregated to obtain the ensemble predictions. The ensemble-based approach employs a local aggregation technique that combines the outcomes of two prognostic models by assigning to each model a weight and a bias correction, which are obtained considering the individual models’ local performances. The dependence between the two indicators is also accounted for, by dependent Gamma processes. The results obtained show that the accuracy of the RUL predictions obtained by the proposed ensemble-based method outperforms that obtained by the individual models.

[1]  P. Moseley Fuel Cell Systems Explained , 2001 .

[2]  Gorjan Alagic,et al.  #p , 2019, Quantum information & computation.

[3]  Noureddine Zerhouni,et al.  Prognostics and Health Management of PEMFC – State of the art and remaining challenges , 2013 .

[4]  Neil J. Gordon,et al.  A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  Sankalita Saha,et al.  Evaluating prognostics performance for algorithms incorporating uncertainty estimates , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[6]  R. Polikar,et al.  Ensemble based systems in decision making , 2006, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine.

[7]  Noureddine Zerhouni,et al.  Prognostics of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells stack using an ensemble of constraints based connectionist networks , 2016 .

[8]  Taejin Kim,et al.  A degenerated equivalent circuit model and hybrid prediction for state-of-health (SOH) of PEM fuel cell , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management.

[9]  Sophie Mercier,et al.  An imperfect replacement policy for a periodically tested system with two dependent wear indicators , 2013 .

[10]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Ensemble neural network-based particle filtering for prognostics , 2013 .

[11]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A locally adaptive ensemble approach for data-driven prognostics of heterogeneous fleets , 2017 .

[12]  Joseph Mathew,et al.  A review on prognostic techniques for non-stationary and non-linear rotating systems , 2015 .

[13]  Mohammadreza Tahan,et al.  Performance-based health monitoring, diagnostics and prognostics for condition-based maintenance of gas turbines: A review , 2017 .

[14]  B. Saha,et al.  Designing Data-Driven Battery Prognostic Approaches for Variable Loading Profiles : Some Lessons Learned , 2012 .

[15]  Petar M. Djuric,et al.  Resampling Methods for Particle Filtering: Classification, implementation, and strategies , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[16]  Luc Devroye,et al.  Complexity Questions in Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation , 2010, COMPSTAT.

[17]  Sirish L. Shah,et al.  Nonlinear Bayesian state estimation: A review of recent developments , 2012 .

[18]  Petar M. Djuric,et al.  Resampling Methods for Particle Filtering , 2015 .

[19]  Piero Baraldi,et al.  Local Fusion of an Ensemble of Models for the Reconstruction of Faulty Signals , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  R. L. Winkler,et al.  Advances in Decision Analysis: Aggregating Probability Distributions , 2007 .

[21]  M. D. Pandey,et al.  The influence of temporal uncertainty of deterioration on life-cycle management of structures , 2009 .

[22]  Donghua Zhou,et al.  Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Junye Wang,et al.  Barriers of scaling-up fuel cells: Cost, durability and reliability , 2015 .

[24]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Ensemble of optimized echo state networks for remaining useful life prediction , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[25]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[26]  Noureddine Zerhouni,et al.  Degradations analysis and aging modeling for health assessment and prognostics of PEMFC , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Sankalita Saha,et al.  Metrics for Offline Evaluation of Prognostic Performance , 2021, International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management.

[28]  Noureddine Zerhouni,et al.  Proton exchange membrane fuel cell behavioral model suitable for prognostics. , 2015 .

[29]  Belkacem Ould Bouamama,et al.  Remaining Useful Life Prediction and Uncertainty Quantification of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Under Variable Load , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[30]  D. Vere-Jones Markov Chains , 1972, Nature.

[31]  Kwok-Leung Tsui,et al.  An ensemble model for predicting the remaining useful performance of lithium-ion batteries , 2013, Microelectron. Reliab..

[32]  Brett Houlding,et al.  Deriving the probability of a linear opinion pooling method being superior to a set of alternatives , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[33]  Belkacem Ould-Bouamama,et al.  Particle filter based hybrid prognostics for health monitoring of uncertain systems in bond graph framework , 2016 .

[34]  Jan M. van Noortwijk,et al.  A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[35]  Christophe Bérenguer,et al.  PHM‐oriented Degradation Indicators for Batteries and Fuel Cells , 2017 .

[36]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Remaining useful life estimation in heterogeneous fleets working under variable operating conditions , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[37]  Piero P. Bonissone,et al.  Fast meta-models for local fusion of multiple predictive models , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[38]  Sophie Mercier,et al.  A preventive maintenance policy for a continuously monitored system with correlated wear indicators , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Nan Chen,et al.  Prognostics and Health Management: A Review on Data Driven Approaches , 2015 .

[40]  Noureddine Zerhouni,et al.  State of the art and taxonomy of prognostics approaches, trends of prognostics applications and open issues towards maturity at different technology readiness levels , 2017 .

[41]  Noureddine Zerhouni,et al.  Particle filter-based prognostics: Review, discussion and perspectives , 2016 .

[42]  Linxia Liao,et al.  A hybrid framework combining data-driven and model-based methods for system remaining useful life prediction , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[43]  Donnacha Bolger,et al.  Reliability updating in linear opinion pooling for multiple decision makers , 2016 .

[44]  Linxia Liao,et al.  Review of Hybrid Prognostics Approaches for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Engineered Systems, and an Application to Battery Life Prediction , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[45]  James Larminie,et al.  Fuel Cell Systems Explained: Larminie/Fuel Cell Systems Explained , 2003 .

[46]  Dacheng Zhang,et al.  Some Improvements of Particle Filtering Based Prognosis for PEM Fuel Cells , 2016 .

[47]  Thamo Sutharssan,et al.  A review on prognostics and health monitoring of proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2017 .

[48]  Walter Sextro,et al.  PEM fuel cell prognostics using particle filter with model parameter adaptation , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management.

[49]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Online Performance Assessment Method for a Model-Based Prognostic Approach , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[50]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Particle Filter-Based Prognostics for an Electrolytic Capacitor Working in Variable Operating Conditions , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[51]  Abdellatif Miraoui,et al.  Degradation prediction of PEM fuel cell using a moving window based hybrid prognostic approach , 2017 .

[52]  L. Mark Berliner,et al.  A Framework for Multi-Model Ensembling , 2016, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantification.