Analogical Reasoning in the Engineering Design Process and Technology Education Applications

Introduction This synthesis paper discusses the research exploring analogical reasoning, the role of analogies in the engineering design process, and educational applications for analogical reasoning. Researchers have discovered that analogical reasoning is often a fundamental cognitive tool in design problem solving. Regarding the possible role of analogical reasoning in the context of technology education; analogies may be a useful tool to develop student’s design skills, teach abstract or complex concepts, and build students’ analogical reasoning skills for general problem solving. The positive and negative educational implications of analogical reasoning being explored by researchers are also discussed. With the development of the Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology (ITEA, 2000) and a focus on the integration of engineering design, the profession has attempted to standardize, validate a need for technology education, and most importantly increase students’ technological literacy. Technological literacy has been defined as the “ability to use, manage, assess, and understand technology” (ITEA, 2000, p. 9). The National Academy of Engineering and the National Research Council, in a joint report (2002), pointed to three interdependent dimensions of technological literacy: (a) knowledge, (b) ways of thinking and acting, and (c) capabilities. Engineering, with its emphasis on design, has been proposed to help bring about technological literacy and improve these cognitive skills (Dearing & Daugherty, 2004). The emphasis on cognition within technology education has led to an increased focus on cognitive science research, which has sought to understand how people think and learn. These efforts have been used to better develop

[1]  D. Gentner Mental Models, Psychology of , 2001 .

[2]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design , 1994 .

[3]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices , 2004 .

[4]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Analogy considered harmful , 1982, CHI '82.

[5]  James E. LaPorte,et al.  Research in Technology Education , 2010 .

[6]  J. Cunningham History , 2007, The Journal of Hellenic Studies.

[7]  David E. Kieras,et al.  The Role of a Mental Model in Learning to Operate a Device. , 1984 .

[8]  D. Gentner,et al.  Cultural models in language and thought: How people construct mental models , 1987 .

[9]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The analogical mind. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[10]  Jyotsna Vaid,et al.  Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes , 2001 .

[11]  Theodore Lewis,et al.  Coming to Terms with Engineering Design as Content , 2005 .

[12]  D. Gentner,et al.  Introduction : The Place of Analogy in Cognition , 2005 .

[13]  J. Kolodner Educational implications of analogy. A view from case-based reasoning. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[14]  D. Gentner,et al.  Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity , 1982 .

[15]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Creativity's camel: The role of analogy in invention. , 1997 .

[16]  D. Gentner,et al.  The analogical mind : perspectives from cognitive science , 2001 .

[17]  Thomas G. Sticht Metaphor and Thought: Educational uses of metaphor , 1993 .

[18]  Willemien Visser,et al.  Two functions of analogical reasoning in design: a cognitive-psychology approach , 1996 .

[19]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering design methods , 1989 .

[20]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education , 1999 .

[21]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  Prior knowledge in design: a dynamic knowledge-based model of design and creativity , 1990 .

[22]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[23]  George A. Miller,et al.  Metaphor and Thought: Images and models, similes and metaphors , 1993 .

[24]  P. K. Saha,et al.  Metaphorical Style as Message , 1988 .

[25]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  The shift from metaphor to analogy in western science , 1993 .

[26]  J. Russell,et al.  Evidence Related to Awareness, Adoption, and Implementation of the Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. , 2005 .

[27]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler , 1997 .

[28]  Ömer Akin,et al.  Variants in Design Cognition , 2001 .

[29]  W. Newstetter,et al.  Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education , 2001 .

[30]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Dimensions of Analogy , 1988 .

[31]  Greg Pearson,et al.  Technically speaking : why all Americans need to know more about technology , 2002 .

[32]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Visual Analogy—a Strategy for Design Reasoning and Learning , 2001 .

[33]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Two Theories of Home Heat Control , 1986, Cogn. Sci..