New insights on labor progression: a systematic review.
暂无分享,去创建一个
J. Troendle | Jun Zhang | T. Duan | O. Oladapo | Xiaojing Zeng | M. Ahlberg | Xiaoqing He | Ellen L. Tilden | S. Bernitz | W. Fraser | Maria Ahlberg | João Paulo Souza
[1] R. Jackson,et al. When standard measurement meets messy genitalia: Lessons from 20th century phallometry and cervimetry. , 2022, Studies in history and philosophy of science.
[2] K. Imai,et al. Reassessing the duration of each stage of labor and their relation to postpartum hemorrhage in the current Japanese population , 2022, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.
[3] A. Caughey,et al. The duration of spontaneous active and pushing phases of labour among 75,243 US women when intervention is minimal: A prospective, observational cohort study , 2022, EClinicalMedicine.
[4] T. Leung,et al. Dynamic changes in maternal immune biomarkers during labor in nulliparous versus multiparous women. , 2022, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[5] J. Troendle,et al. Re: Impact of analysis technique on our understanding of the natural history of labour , 2022, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[6] D. Ren,et al. Associations between prolonged second stage of labor and maternal and neonatal outcomes in freestanding birth centers: a retrospective analysis , 2022, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.
[7] João Pedro Vidal Nunes,et al. Concerns about the contemporary labor curves and guidelines: Is it time to revisit the old ones? , 2021, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.
[8] E. Wiberg-Itzel. Amniotic fluid lactate (AFL): a new predictor of labor outcome in dystocic deliveries , 2021, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.
[9] T. Ikeda,et al. Spontaneous labor curve based on a retrospective multi‐center study in Japan , 2021, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.
[10] C. Lees,et al. Intrapartum ultrasound for assessment of cervical dilatation. , 2021, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM.
[11] R. Unger,et al. Normal Labor Curve in Twin Gestation. , 2021, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[12] F. Conversano,et al. Novel artificial intelligence approach for automatic differentiation of fetal occiput anterior and non‐occiput anterior positions during labor , 2021, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[13] R. Purwar,et al. Progression of the first stage of labour, in low risk nulliparas in a South Asian population: a prospective observational study , 2021, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
[14] Dr Hulda Hjartardóttir,et al. Can ultrasound on admission in active labor predict labor duration and a spontaneous delivery?: Condensation: Ultrasound at the beginning of the active phase can predict length of labor and mode of delivery in nulliparous women. , 2021, American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM.
[15] K. McGeechan,et al. Impact of analysis technique on our understanding of the natural history of labour: a simulation study , 2021, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[16] R. Escuriet,et al. Oxytocin Administration in Low-Risk Women, a Retrospective Analysis of Birth and Neonatal Outcomes , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.
[17] T. Kawakita,et al. Refining the clinical definition of active phase arrest of dilation in nulliparous women to consider degree of cervical dilation as well as duration of arrest.: Short title: Clinically defined active phase arrest of labor. , 2021, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[18] E. Vaisbuch,et al. Intrapartum ultrasound at the initiation of the active second stage of labor predicts spontaneous vaginal delivery. , 2020, American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM.
[19] M. Naqvi,et al. Prolonged Second Stage of Labor and Anal Sphincter Injury in a Contemporary Cohort of Term Nulliparas , 2020, American Journal of Perinatology.
[20] S. Lund,et al. Fetal descent in nulliparous women assessed by ultrasound: a longitudinal study. , 2020, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[21] Louis B. Lundborg,et al. First stage progression in women with spontaneous onset of labor: A large population-based cohort study , 2020, PloS one.
[22] G. Macones,et al. Association of abnormal first stage of labor duration and maternal and neonatal morbidity. , 2020, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[23] Julia C Phillippi,et al. The association between longer durations of the active phase of labor and subsequent perinatal processes and outcomes among midwifery patients. , 2020, Birth.
[24] N. Lowe,et al. An Integrated Review of Uterine Activity Monitoring for Evaluating Labor Dystocia , 2020, Journal of midwifery & women's health.
[25] Y. Ville,et al. A Novel Partogram for Stages 1 and 2 of Labor Based on Fetal Head Station Measured by Ultrasound: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study , 2020, American Journal of Perinatology.
[26] P. Kempe,et al. Women's satisfaction with the birthing experience in relation to duration of labour, obstetric interventions and mode of birth. , 2020, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.
[27] F. Conversano,et al. New technique for automatic sonographic measurement of change in head–perineum distance and angle of progression during active phase of second stage of labor , 2020, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[28] K. Gregory,et al. Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity After 4 and 6 Hours of Protracted Active Labor in Nulliparous Term Pregnancies. , 2019, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[29] Inge Christoffer Olsen,et al. The Labour Progression Study (LaPS): Duration of labour following Zhang's guideline and the WHO partograph - A cluster randomised trial. , 2019, Midwifery.
[30] Jun Zhang,et al. Labor patterns in Asian American women with vaginal birth and normal perinatal outcomes. , 2019, Birth.
[31] Julia C Phillippi,et al. Describing latent phase duration and associated characteristics among 1281 low-risk women in spontaneous labor. , 2019, Birth.
[32] M. Firat,et al. Reassessing the length of labour in healthy Turkish women: a retrospective and descriptive study , 2019, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
[33] T. Leung,et al. Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor. , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[34] Y. Ginsberg,et al. The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[35] Inge Christoffer Olsen,et al. The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial , 2019, The Lancet.
[36] R. Unger,et al. Contemporary Patterns of Labor in nulliparous and multiparous women. , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[37] Ann Borders,et al. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. , 2019, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[38] S. Downe,et al. WHO model of intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: transforming care of women and babies for improved health and wellbeing , 2018, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[39] M. Schiff,et al. Duration of Spontaneous Active Labor and Perinatal Outcomes Using Contemporary Labor Curves , 2018, American Journal of Perinatology.
[40] D. Rouse,et al. Peripartum Morbidity after Cesarean Delivery for Arrest of Dilation at 4 to 5 cm Compared with 6 to 10 cm , 2018, American Journal of Perinatology.
[41] O. Oladapo,et al. Cervical dilatation over time is a poor predictor of severe adverse birth outcomes: a diagnostic accuracy study , 2018, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[42] A. Menciassi,et al. Devices for Measuring Cervical Dilation During Labor: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2018, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.
[43] A. Tinelli,et al. The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations. , 2018, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[44] Jun Zhang,et al. Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries , 2018, PLoS medicine.
[45] E. A. Friedman,et al. Management of Labor: Are the New Guidelines Justified? , 2018, Journal of midwifery & women's health.
[46] U. Reddy,et al. Reassessing the Duration of the Second Stage of Labor in Relation to Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity. , 2018, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[47] F. Conversano,et al. Automatic ultrasound technique to measure angle of progression during labor , 2017, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[48] G. Pilu,et al. Three-dimensional/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: clinical utility and future prospects , 2017, International journal of women's health.
[49] G. Pilu,et al. The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[50] Chie Nagata,et al. Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[51] S. Cnattingius,et al. Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study , 2017, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.
[52] Paul S Albert,et al. Estimating time to event characteristics via longitudinal threshold regression models ‐ an application to cervical dilation progression , 2016, Statistics in medicine.
[53] A. Pembe,et al. Lactate in Amniotic Fluid: Predictor of Labor Outcome in Oxytocin-Augmented Primiparas’ Deliveries , 2016, PloS one.
[54] H. Qi,et al. Labour patterns in Chinese women in Chongqing , 2016, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[55] Irene Maffi. The Detour of an Obstetric Technology: Active Management of Labor Across Cultures , 2016, Medical anthropology.
[56] E. Ferrazzi,et al. Progression of cervical dilatation in normal human labor is unpredictable , 2015, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.
[57] W. Leung,et al. Relationship between intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression and head–perineum distance with correlation to conventional clinical parameters of labor progress and time to delivery , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.
[58] N. Lowe,et al. Differences in inflammatory markers between nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in preactive vs active labor. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[59] S. Ratcliffe,et al. The estimation of branching curves in the presence of subject‐specific random effects , 2014, Statistics in medicine.
[60] S. Oveisi,et al. Prolonged Second Stage of Labor and Levator Ani Muscle Injuries , 2014, Global journal of health science.
[61] U. Reddy,et al. Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes With Prolonged Second Stage of Labor , 2014, Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[62] A. Caughey,et al. Are There Differences in the First Stage of Labor between Black and White Women? , 2014, American Journal of Perinatology.
[63] Lorie M. Harper,et al. Defining an abnormal first stage of labor based on maternal and neonatal outcomes. , 2014, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[64] Gynecologists. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[65] G. Macones,et al. Fetal Descent in Labor , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[66] C. Lees,et al. The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[67] J. Hibbard,et al. Contemporary Labor Patterns and Maternal Age , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[68] A. Morselli-Labate,et al. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[69] C. Lees,et al. Simple two‐dimensional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[70] K. Malini,et al. Partographic Analysis of Spontaneous Labour at Term in Primigravida , 2012, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India.
[71] G. Pilu,et al. Intrapartum three‐dimensional ultrasonographic imaging of face presentations: report of two cases , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[72] S. Laughon,et al. Changes in labor patterns over 50 years. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[73] G. Macones,et al. Impact of fetal gender on the labor curve. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[74] G. Pilu,et al. Intrapartum sonographic imaging of fetal head asynclitism , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[75] R. Calderon-Margalit,et al. 338: Population based labor curves , 2012 .
[76] K. Salvesen,et al. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[77] J. Pezzullo,et al. Variability in rate of cervical dilation in nulliparous women at term. , 2011, Birth.
[78] Jun Zhang,et al. Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor With Normal Neonatal Outcomes , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[79] Yvonne W. Cheng,et al. Length of the First Stage of Labor and Associated Perinatal Outcomes in Nulliparous Women , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[80] S. Horiuchi,et al. Evaluation of the labor curve in nulliparous Japanese women. , 2010, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[81] R. Mikolajczyk,et al. The Natural History of the Normal First Stage of Labor , 2010, Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[82] G. Cundiff,et al. Labour curve findings associated with fourth degree sphincter disruption: the impact of labour progression on perineal trauma. , 2010, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.
[83] P. Flood,et al. Mathematical Modeling of the Pain and Progress of the First Stage of Nulliparous Labor , 2009, Anesthesiology.
[84] A. Herman,et al. Intrapartum Measurement of Cervical Dilatation Using Translabial 3‐Dimensional Ultrasonography , 2009, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
[85] W. Fraser,et al. When to stop pushing: effects of duration of second-stage expulsion efforts on maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[86] Dwight J Rouse,et al. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[87] M. Ijaiya,et al. Pattern of cervical dilatation among parturients in Ilorin, Nigeria. , 2009, Annals of African medicine.
[88] A. Allen,et al. Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes With Increasing Duration of the Second Stage of Labor , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[89] Y. Ville,et al. How reliable is the determination of cervical dilation? Comparison of vaginal examination with spatial position-tracking ruler. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[90] Yoav Paltieli,et al. Determination of fetal head station and position during labor: a new technique that combines ultrasound and a position-tracking system. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[91] Aaron B Caughey,et al. Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[92] Ofer Barnea,et al. Continuous monitoring of cervical dilatation and fetal head station during labor. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.
[93] George Turabelidze,et al. Labor dystocia and its association with interpregnancy interval. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[94] J. Troendle,et al. The impact of parity on course of labor in a contemporary population. , 2006, Birth.
[95] Yvonne W. Cheng,et al. Are there ethnic differences in the length of labor? , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[96] B. Lundman,et al. The negative birth experience of prolonged labour: a case-referent study. , 2005, Journal of clinical nursing.
[97] S. Drobnič,et al. Influence of fixed and time-dependent factors on duration of normal first stage labor. , 2005, Birth.
[98] S. Cesario,et al. Reevaluation of Friedman's Labor Curve: a pilot study. , 2004, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.
[99] Aaron B Caughey,et al. How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[100] R. Sokol,et al. Is abnormal labor associated with shoulder dystocia in nulliparous women? , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[101] Gynecologists. Dystocia and the augmentation of labor , 1996, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[102] Elizabeth Johnson,et al. The descent curve of the grand multiparous woman. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[103] E. Larson,et al. Length of normal labor in women of Hispanic origin. , 2003, Journal of midwifery & women's health.
[104] Jun Zhang,et al. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[105] A. Popovtzer,et al. The labor curve of the grand multipara: does progress of labor continue to improve with additional childbearing? , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[106] J. Wiener,et al. A Second‐Stage Partogram , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[107] D. Rouse,et al. Criteria for Failed Labor Induction: Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Protocol , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[108] M. Barger,et al. The length of the second stage of labor in uncomplicated, nulliparous African American and Puerto Rican women. , 2000, Journal of midwifery & women's health.
[109] D. Rouse,et al. Active-phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 hours. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[110] L. Albers,et al. The Duration of Labor in Healthy Women , 1999, Journal of Perinatology.
[111] E. Schiff,et al. Progression of labor in twin versus singleton gestations. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[112] N. Johnson,et al. Randomised trial comparing a policy of early with selective amniotomy in uncomplicated labour at term , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[113] C. Lockwood,et al. [Average length of spontaneous labor in Chinese primigravidas]. , 1997, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.
[114] L. Albers,et al. The Length of Active Labor in Normal Pregnancies , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[115] H. Wallenburg,et al. Ultrasound assessment of cervical dynamics during the first stage of labor. , 1994, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.
[116] P. Kirkinen,et al. Partogram of a grand multipara: different descent slope compared with an ordinary parturient , 1994 .
[117] World Health Organization partograph in management of labour. World Health Organization Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme. , 1994, Lancet.
[118] M. Schorn,et al. Water immersion and the effect on labor. , 1993, Journal of nurse-midwifery.
[119] C. Paterson,et al. The characteristics of the second stage of labour in 25 069 singleton deliveries in the North West Thames Health Region, 1988 , 1992, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[120] J. Stronge,et al. The clinical significance of pain and cognitive activity in latent labor. , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[121] J. Mancuso. Characteristics of normal labor. , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[122] M. Rosen,et al. Transition from Latent to Active Labor , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[123] B. Leigh. The use of partograms by maternal and child health aides. , 1986, Journal of tropical pediatrics.
[124] K. Chu,et al. Double‐Lined Nomogram of Cervical Dilatation in Chinese Primigravidas , 1986, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.
[125] J. Stronge,et al. Active management of labor. , 1973, Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie.
[126] H. A. Burgess. Use of the labor graph in Malawi. , 1986, Journal of nurse-midwifery.
[127] D. A. Franco,et al. Nomograma de la dilatación del cervix en el parto , 1985 .
[128] O. Ayangade. Management from early labour using the partogram - a prospective study. , 1983, East African medical journal.
[129] H. Hopwood. Shoulder dystocia: fifteen years' experience in a community hospital. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[130] L. Cardozo,et al. Outcome of spontaneous labour in multigravidae , 1982, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[131] R. H. Philpott,et al. Intrauterine‐pressure studies in African nulliparae: normal labour progress , 1982, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[132] C. Lennox. The cervicograph in labour management in the Highland of Papua New Guinea. , 1981, Papua and New Guinea medical journal.
[133] P. Drouin. The Value of the Partogramme in the Management of Labor , 1979, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[134] L. Bakketeig,et al. Duration of Labour with Spontaneous Onset , 1979, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.
[135] R. Jayasinghe,et al. The partographs of the Jamaican parturient. , 1977, The West Indian medical journal.
[136] M. Evans,et al. Predictive Value of Cervical Dilatation Rates: I. Primipara Labor , 1976, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[137] N. Duignan,et al. CHARACTERISTICS OF NORMAL LABOUR IN DIFFERENT RACIAL GROUPS , 1975, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[138] D. R. Clegg,et al. Identification of high risk labours by labour nomogram. , 1975, British medical journal.
[139] J. Studd. Partograms and Nomograms of Cervical Dilatation in Management of Primigravid Labour , 1973, British medical journal.
[140] J. Stronge,et al. Active Management of Labour , 1973, British medical journal.
[141] R. H. Philpott,et al. CERVICOGRAPHS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LABOUR IN PRIMIGRAVIDAE , 1972, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.
[142] R. H. Philpott,et al. CERVICOGRAPHS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LABOUR IN PRIMIGRAVIDAE , 1972, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.
[143] E. A. Friedman,et al. COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF LABOUR PROGRESSION , 1969, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.
[144] Larry McGowan,et al. Labor: Clinical Evaluation and Management , 1967 .
[145] E. A. Friedman. Labor in multiparas; a graphicostatistical analysis. , 1956, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[146] E. A. Friedman,et al. Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. , 1955, Obstetrics and gynecology.