Measurement Matters—Alternative Input Price Proxies for Bank Efficiency Analyses

Most bank efficiency studies that use stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) employ each bank’s own implicit input price when estimating efficient frontiers. But at the same time, most studies are based on cost and/or profit models that assume perfect input markets. Traditional input price proxies therefore contain at least substantial measurement error. We suggest here two alternative input market definitions to approximate exogenous input prices. We have access to Bundesbank data, which allows us to cover virtually all German universal banks between 1993 and 2003. The use of alternative input price proxies leads to mean cost efficiency that is significantly five percentage points lower compared to traditional input prices. Mean profit efficiency is hardly affected. Across models, small cooperative banks located in large western states perform best while large banks and those located in eastern states rank lowest.

[1]  C. Kool,et al.  Inefficient or Just Different? Effects of Heterogeneity on Bank Efficiency Scores , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Consistency Conditions for Regulatory Analysis of Financial Institutions: A Comparison of Frontier Efficiency Methods , 1998 .

[3]  G. Battese,et al.  ESTIMATION OF A PRODUCTION FRONTIER MODEL: WITH APPLICATION TO THE PASTORAL ZONE OF EASTERN AUSTRALIA , 1977 .

[4]  F. Wilcoxon.  Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[5]  Dean C. Mountain,et al.  Factor price misspecification in bank cost function estimation , 1999 .

[6]  Michael Koetter,et al.  Still overbanked and unprofitable? Two decades of German banking , 2006 .

[7]  P. Welzel,et al.  Efficiency and technical progress in banking Empirical results for a panel of German cooperative banks , 1996 .

[8]  Badi H. Baltagi,et al.  A General Index of Technical Change , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  J. Bikker,et al.  Trends in Competition and Profitability in the Banking Industry: A Basic Framework , 2005 .

[10]  Donald M. Waldman,et al.  A stationary point for the stochastic frontier likelihood , 1982 .

[11]  Peter Welzel,et al.  Mergers Among German Cooperative Banks: A Panel-based Stochastic Frontier Analysis , 1999 .

[12]  Dennis J. Aigner.  MSE dominance of least squares with errors-of-observation , 1974 .

[13]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Confidence statements for efficiency estimates from stochastic frontier models , 1996 .

[14]  Reinhard H. Schmidt,et al.  The German Financial System , 2004 .

[15]  Thomas F. Siems,et al.  X-Efficiency in Banking: Looking beyond the Balance Sheet , 2002 .

[16]  Loretta J. Mester,et al.  A quality and risk-adjusted cost function for banks: Evidence on the “too-big-to-fail” doctrine , 1993 .

[17]  U. Jensen.  Is it efficient to analyse efficiency rankings? , 2000 .

[18]  C. Lovell,et al.  On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model , 1982 .

[19]  Allen N. Berger.  “Distribution-free” estimates of efficiency in the U.S. banking industry and tests of the standard distributional assumptions , 1993 .

[20]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Comparing mean efficiency and productivity scores from small samples: A bootstrap methodology , 1995 .

[21]  Loretta J. Mester.  Measuring efficiency at U.S. banks: Accounting for heterogeneity is important , 1997 .

[22]  P. Molyneux,et al.  Bank Ownership and Efficiency , 2001 .

[23]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  A Review and Empirical Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Approaches to Inference on Efficiency Levels in Stochastic Frontier Models with Panel Data , 2000 .

[24]  D. Aigner,et al.  P. Schmidt, 1977,?Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,? , 1977 .

[25]  Lawrence B. Pulley,et al.  Banks' Responses to Deregulation: Profits, Technology, and Efficiency , 1997 .

[26]  Allen N. Berger.  The efficiency effects of a single market for financial services in Europe , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Loretta J. Mester,et al.  Inside the Black Box: What Explains Differences in the Efficiencies of Financial Institutions? , 1997 .

[28]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[29]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  A Suggestion for Using Powerful and Informative Tests of Normality , 1990 .

[30]  A. Hackethal.  German Banks and Banking Structure , 2004 .

[31]  J. M. Pastor,et al.  An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems Operating under Different Environmental Conditions , 2002 .

[32]  Explaining Efficiency Differences Among Large German and Austrian Banks , 2004 .

[33]  C. W. Sealey,et al.  Inputs, Outputs, and a Theory of Production and Cost at Depository Financial Institutions , 1977 .

[34]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  Stochastic frontier analysis , 2000 .

[35]  Dominique Deprins,et al.  ESTIMATING TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCIES WITH CORRECTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS , 1989 .

[36]  J. M. Pastor,et al.  Cost and profit efficiency in European banks , 2002 .

[37]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  TRANSCENDENTAL LOGARITHMIC PRODUCTION FRONTIERS , 1973 .

[38]  S. Kumbhakar,et al.  A Generalized Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in U.S. Dairy Farms , 1991 .

[39]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[40]  C. Lovell,et al.  Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Frontmatter , 2000 .

[41]  Peter Welzel,et al.  Technology and Cost Efficiency in Universal Banking A “Thick Frontier”-Analysis of the German Banking Industry , 1998 .