Selective protein O-GlcNAcylation in cells by a proximity-directed O-GlcNAc transferase

O-Linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) is a monosaccharide that plays an essential role in cellular signaling throughout the nucleocytoplasmic proteome of eukaryotic cells. Yet, the study of post-translational modifications like O-GlcNAc has been limited by the lack of strategies to induce O-GlcNAcylation on a target protein in cells. Here, we report a generalizable genetic strategy to induce O-GlcNAc to specific target proteins in cells using a nanobody as a proximity-directing agent fused to O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT). Fusion of a nanobody that recognizes GFP (nGFP) or a nanobody that recognizes the four-amino acid sequence EPEA (nEPEA) to OGT(4), a truncated form of OGT, yielded a nanobody-OGT(4) construct that selectively delivered O-GlcNAc to the target protein (e.g., JunB, cJun, Nup62) and reduced alteration of global O-GlcNAc levels in the cell. Quantitative chemical proteomics confirmed the selective increase in O-GlcNAc to the target protein by nanobody-OGT(4). Glycoproteomics revealed that nanobody-OGT(4) or full-length OGT produced a similar glycosite profile on the target protein. Finally, we demonstrate the ability to selectively target endogenous α-synuclein for glycosylation in HEK293T cells. Thus, the use of nanobodies to redirect OGT substrate selection is a versatile strategy to induce glycosylation of desired target proteins in cells that will facilitate discovery of O-GlcNAc functions and provide a mechanism to engineer O-GlcNAc signaling. The proximity-directed OGT approach for protein-selective O-GlcNAcylation is readily translated to additional protein targets and nanobodies that may constitute a generalizable strategy to control post-translational modifications in cells. Significance Statement Nature uses post-translational modifications (PTMs) like glycosylation as a mechanism to alter protein signaling and function. However, the study of these modified proteins in cells is confined to loss-of-function strategies, such as mutagenic elimination of the modification site. Here, we report a generalizable strategy for induction of O-GlcNAc to a protein target in cells. The O-GlcNAc modification is installed by O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) to thousands of nucleocytoplasmic proteins. Fusion of a nanobody to OGT enables the selective increase of O-GlcNAc levels on a series of target proteins. The described approach will facilitate direct studies of O-GlcNAc and its regulatory enzymes and drive new approaches to engineer protein signaling via a strategy that may be conceptually translatable to additional PTMs.

[1]  S. Walker,et al.  Aspartate residues far from the active site drive O-GlcNAc transferase substrate selection. , 2019, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  Damien Y. Duveau,et al.  Structure-Based Evolution of Low Nanomolar O-GlcNAc Transferase Inhibitors. , 2018, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  L. Hsieh‐Wilson,et al.  Optimization of Chemoenzymatic Mass Tagging by Strain-Promoted Cycloaddition (SPAAC) for the Determination of O-GlcNAc Stoichiometry by Western Blotting. , 2018, Biochemistry.

[4]  Emma J. Chory,et al.  Chemically induced proximity in biology and medicine , 2018, Science.

[5]  S. Walker,et al.  O-GlcNAc Transferase Recognizes Protein Substrates Using an Asparagine Ladder in the Tetratricopeptide Repeat (TPR) Superhelix. , 2018, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Mapping and Quantification of Over 2000 O-linked Glycopeptides in Activated Human T Cells with Isotope-Targeted Glycoproteomics (Isotag)* , 2018, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[7]  Anil K. Shukla,et al.  Quantitative proteomics identifies altered O‐GlcNAcylation of structural, synaptic and memory‐associated proteins in Alzheimer's disease , 2017, The Journal of pathology.

[8]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Elucidating crosstalk mechanisms between phosphorylation and O-GlcNAcylation , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  S. Bultmann,et al.  Site-specific recruitment of epigenetic factors with a modular CRISPR/Cas system , 2017, Nucleus.

[10]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Global Analysis of O-GlcNAc Glycoproteins in Activated Human T Cells , 2016, The Journal of Immunology.

[11]  B. Garcia,et al.  A Novel Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Platform for Determining Protein O-GlcNAcylation Dynamics* , 2016, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[12]  R. Huganir,et al.  The nutrient sensor OGT in PVN neurons regulates feeding , 2016, Science.

[13]  Serge Muyldermans,et al.  Nanobodies as Probes for Protein Dynamics in Vitro and in Cells* , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  H. Moriya,et al.  Quantitative nature of overexpression experiments , 2015, Molecular biology of the cell.

[15]  Don B. Arnold,et al.  O-GlcNAc modification blocks the aggregation and toxicity of the Parkinson’s disease associated protein α-synuclein , 2015, Nature chemistry.

[16]  A. W. Schüttelkopf,et al.  The active site of O-GlcNAc transferase imposes constraints on substrate sequence , 2015, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[17]  J. Iglesias-Fernández,et al.  Dynamic interplay between catalytic and lectin domains of GalNAc-transferases modulates protein O-glycosylation , 2015, Nature Communications.

[18]  D. Vocadlo,et al.  O-GlcNAc occurs cotranslationally to stabilize nascent polypeptide chains. , 2015, Nature chemical biology.

[19]  Jürg Müller,et al.  A critical perspective of the diverse roles of O-GlcNAc transferase in chromatin , 2015, Chromosoma.

[20]  Linda C Hsieh-Wilson,et al.  Phosphofructokinase 1 Glycosylation Regulates Cell Growth and Metabolism , 2012, Science.

[21]  Kyong-Tai Kim,et al.  O‐GlcNAcase is essential for embryonic development and maintenance of genomic stability , 2012, Aging cell.

[22]  A. Burlingame,et al.  Global Identification and Characterization of Both O-GlcNAcylation and Phosphorylation at the Murine Synapse* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[23]  Matthew S Macauley,et al.  Increasing O-GlcNAc slows neurodegeneration and stabilizes tau against aggregation. , 2012, Nature chemical biology.

[24]  M. Affolter,et al.  Fluorescent fusion protein knockout mediated by anti-GFP nanobody , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[25]  S. Walker,et al.  A Neutral Diphosphate Mimic Crosslinks the Active Site of Human O-GlcNAc Transferase , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[26]  T. Kamitani,et al.  Improved Immunodetection of Endogenous α-Synuclein , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  D. Vocadlo,et al.  Hijacking a biosynthetic pathway yields a glycosyltransferase inhibitor within cells , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[28]  O. Kovtun,et al.  Structural and thermodynamic analysis of the GFP:GFP‐nanobody complex , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[29]  Piotr Sliz,et al.  Structure of human O-GlcNAc transferase and its complex with a peptide substrate , 2010, Nature.

[30]  C. Dobson,et al.  Structure and properties of a complex of α-synuclein and a single-domain camelid antibody. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  L. Hsieh‐Wilson,et al.  Quantitation of O-Glycosylation Stoichiometry and Dynamics using Resolvable Mass Tags , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[32]  B. White,et al.  Chemically controlled protein assembly: techniques and applications. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[33]  D. Guerini,et al.  Requirement for O‐linked N‐acetylglucosaminyltransferase in lymphocytes activation , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[34]  L. Banaszynski,et al.  A Rapid, Reversible, and Tunable Method to Regulate Protein Function in Living Cells Using Synthetic Small Molecules , 2006, Cell.

[35]  G. Hart,et al.  Ogt-Dependent X-Chromosome-Linked Protein Glycosylation Is a Requisite Modification in Somatic Cell Function and Embryo Viability , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[36]  G. Hart,et al.  Roles of the Tetratricopeptide Repeat Domain in O-GlcNAc Transferase Targeting and Protein Substrate Specificity* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  G. Hart,et al.  The O-GlcNAc transferase gene resides on the X chromosome and is essential for embryonic stem cell viability and mouse ontogeny. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  J. Hanover,et al.  Functional Expression of O-linked GlcNAc Transferase , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Controlling signal transduction with synthetic ligands. , 1993, Science.

[40]  G. Hart,et al.  Glycosylation of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins. Purification and characterization of a uridine diphospho-N-acetylglucosamine:polypeptide beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[41]  L. Hsieh‐Wilson,et al.  Methods for the Detection, Study, and Dynamic Profiling of O-GlcNAc Glycosylation. , 2018, Methods in enzymology.

[42]  Corella S. Casas-Delucchi,et al.  Modulation of protein properties in living cells using nanobodies , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[43]  B. Kuster,et al.  Proteome Wide Purification and Identification of O‑glcnac-modified Proteins Using Click Chemistry and Mass Spectrometry , 2022 .