Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review

BackgroundEvidence-based treatment guidelines embedded in computer-based clinical decision support systems (CCDSS) may improve patient-reported outcomes (PRO). We systematically reviewed the literature for content and application of CCDSS, and their effects on PRO.MethodsA systematic review in MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted according to PRISMA standards. Searches were limited to the publication period 1996–May 2014 and the English language. The search terms covered “computerized clinical decision systems” and “patient-reported outcomes”. Screening and extraction was done independently by two reviewers according to predefined inclusion (computer and guideline) and exclusion criteria (no trial, no PRO). Study and CCDSS quality was rated according to predefined criteria.ResultsThe database searches identified 1,331 references. Eighty-seven full-text articles were analyzed. The main reason for exclusion was no PRO as a study outcome measure. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 13,480 patients. Nine studies used a computerized device to fill in data; in four studies, this was used by the patients themselves. Most of the studies presented the data to the clinician at point of care and incorporated international guidelines. Three studies showed a positive effect on PRO, but only on symptoms. Overall, no negative effects were reported. There was no association with study quality or year of study publication.ConclusionThere are marginal positive effects of CCDSS on specific PRO. Factors that facilitate the use and effect are identified. Easy to use systems with difficult to ignore evidence-based advice need to be developed and tested.

[1]  S. Shaughnessy,et al.  Do No Harm: Health Systems’ Duty to Promote Clinician Well-Being , 2022, American Journal of Hospital Medicine.

[2]  S. Kaasa.  Using quality of life assessment methods in patients with advanced cancer: a clinical perspective. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[3]  N. Polissar,et al.  Implementing guidelines for cancer pain management: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  R G Neville,et al.  Lessons from a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate computer decision support software to improve the management of asthma , 2001, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[5]  I J Higginson,et al.  Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  David Parkin,et al.  Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  G. Lewis,et al.  Computerised patient-specific guidelines for management of common mental disorders in primary care: a randomised controlled trial. , 2004, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  C. McDonald,et al.  Failure of Computerized Treatment Suggestions to Improve Health Outcomes of Outpatients with Uncomplicated Hypertension: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2004, Pharmacotherapy.

[9]  W. Tierney,et al.  A controlled trial of including symptom data in computer-based care suggestions for managing patients with chronic heart failure. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  C. Delpierre,et al.  A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach? , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[11]  A. Localio,et al.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. , 2005, JAMA.

[12]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[14]  J Marc Overhage,et al.  Can computer-generated evidence-based care suggestions enhance evidence-based management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A randomized, controlled trial. , 2005, Health services research.

[15]  Marc Berg,et al.  Review Paper: Overriding of Drug Safety Alerts in Computerized Physician Order Entry , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  Suzanne Steinbach,et al.  A Randomized Clinical Trial of Clinician Feedback to Improve Quality of Care for Inner-city Children With Asthma , 2006, Pediatrics.

[17]  Improving the Management of Pain in Hospitalized Adults , 2006 .

[18]  Henry J. Lowe,et al.  A randomized trial using computerized decision support to improve treatment of major depression in primary care , 2002, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[19]  C. McDonald,et al.  Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care , 2003, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[20]  Anke J. E. de Veer,et al.  Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: A systematic meta-review , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[21]  Dagny Faksvåg Haugen,et al.  Symptom assessment in palliative care: a need for international collaboration. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Walter E. Haefeli,et al.  Multidisciplinary pain management based on a computerized clinical decision support system in cancer pain patients , 2009, PAIN®.

[23]  Joel Tsevat,et al.  Development of an electronic medical record-based clinical decision support tool to improve HIV symptom management. , 2009, AIDS patient care and STDs.

[24]  W. Gaebel,et al.  Prevention of rehospitalization in schizophrenia: results of an integrated care project in Germany , 2009, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.

[25]  W. Gaebel,et al.  Improving outpatient treatment in schizophrenia: effects of computerized guideline implementation—results of a multicenter-study within the German Research Network on Schizophrenia , 2010, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.

[26]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[27]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[28]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for primary preventive care: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[29]  Brian J Hemens,et al.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for drug prescribing and management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[30]  Monique W. M. Jaspers,et al.  Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[31]  N. Wilczynski,et al.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for acute care management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[32]  Amy P Abernethy,et al.  Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: meta-regression of 162 randomised trials , 2013, BMJ : British Medical Journal.