DNA translocation through low-noise glass nanopores.

The effect of electron irradiation-induced shrinking on glass nanocapillaries with diameters ranging from 75 to 14 nm was analyzed by measuring the conductance characteristics with and without DNA translocation. We have investigated nanocapillary shrinking with a scanning electron microscope from several perspectives to understand the geometry of the shrunken nanocapillary. On the basis of this observation, the conductance was modeled with respect to the nanocapillary diameter, which allowed reproducing the experimental results. We then translocated DNA through the shrunken nanocapillaries and measured higher conductance drops for smaller diameters, reaching 1.7 nS for the 14 nm diameter nanocapillary. A model taking into account the conical shape of the shrunken nanocapillaries also supported this dependence. Next, we calculated the noise in the form of the standard deviation of the ionic conductance (between 0.04 and 0.15 nS) to calculate a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and compared it with nanopores embedded in 20 nm thick silicon nitride membranes. This shows that although nanocapillaries have smaller signal amplitudes due to their conical shape, they benefit from a lower noise. The glass nanocapillaries have a good SNR of about 25 compared with the SNR of 15 for smaller sized nanopores in silicon nitride membranes. The ability to use a modified model of nanopores to mimic the block conductance by DNA translocation provides a theoretical framework to support experimental results from translocating polymers such as DNA.

[1]  O. Otto,et al.  Rapid internal contraction boosts DNA friction , 2013, Nature Communications.

[2]  N H Dekker,et al.  Noise in solid-state nanopores , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  C. Dekker,et al.  Fabrication of solid-state nanopores with single-nanometre precision , 2003, Nature materials.

[4]  Ulrich F Keyser,et al.  Detecting DNA folding with nanocapillaries. , 2010, Nano letters.

[5]  A. Meller,et al.  Rapid Fabrication of Uniformly Sized Nanopores and Nanopore Arrays for Parallel DNA Analysis , 2006 .

[6]  L. Steinbock,et al.  Controllable shrinking and shaping of glass nanocapillaries under electron irradiation. , 2013, Nano letters.

[7]  Silvia Hernández-Ainsa,et al.  DNA origami nanopores for controlling DNA translocation. , 2013, ACS nano.

[8]  S. Ghosal,et al.  DNA interactions in crowded nanopores. , 2013, Nano letters.

[9]  G. Willmott,et al.  Resistive pulse asymmetry for nanospheres passing through tunable submicron pores , 2011 .

[10]  Silvia Hernández-Ainsa,et al.  Single protein molecule detection by glass nanopores. , 2013, ACS nano.

[11]  Andre Marziali,et al.  Noise analysis and reduction in solid-state nanopores , 2007 .

[12]  Jingmin Jin,et al.  Rapid electronic detection of probe-specific microRNAs using thin nanopore sensors. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[13]  Juhyoun Kwak,et al.  Ion-beam sculpting at nanometre length scales , 2001 .

[14]  Shanshan Wu,et al.  Lithography-free formation of nanopores in plastic membranes using laser heating. , 2006, Nano letters.

[15]  Marc Gershow,et al.  DNA molecules and configurations in a solid-state nanopore microscope , 2003, Nature materials.

[16]  Jacob K Rosenstein,et al.  Slow DNA transport through nanopores in hafnium oxide membranes. , 2013, ACS nano.

[17]  A. deMello,et al.  Resizing metal-coated nanopores using a scanning electron microscope. , 2011, Small.

[18]  A. Radenović,et al.  Nanopore detection of single molecule RNAP-DNA transcription complex. , 2012, Nano letters.

[19]  C Raillon,et al.  Fast and automatic processing of multi-level events in nanopore translocation experiments. , 2012, Nanoscale.

[20]  A. Balan,et al.  Differentiation of short, single-stranded DNA homopolymers in solid-state nanopores. , 2013, ACS nano.

[21]  O. Otto,et al.  Note: Direct force and ionic-current measurements on DNA in a nanocapillary. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.

[22]  C. P. Bean,et al.  Counting and Sizing of Submicron Particles by the Resistive Pulse Technique , 1970 .

[23]  Cees Dekker,et al.  Modeling the conductance and DNA blockade of solid-state nanopores , 2011, Nanotechnology.

[24]  Lydia L. Sohn,et al.  Direct detection of antibody–antigen binding using an on-chip artificial pore , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  A. Balan,et al.  Di ff erentiation of Short , Single-Stranded DNA Homopolymers in Solid-State Nanopores , 2013 .

[26]  M. Gracheva Nanopore-Based Technology , 2012, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[27]  R A Levis,et al.  The use of quartz patch pipettes for low noise single channel recording. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Y. Shao,et al.  FAST KINETIC MEASUREMENTS WITH NANOMETER-SIZED PIPETS. TRANSFER OF POTASSIUM ION FROM WATER INTO DICHLOROETHANE FACILITATED BY DIBENZO-18-CROWN-6 , 1997 .

[29]  U. Keyser,et al.  Salt dependence of ion transport and DNA translocation through solid-state nanopores. , 2006, Nano letters.

[30]  O. Otto,et al.  Voltage‐driven transport of ions and DNA through nanocapillaries , 2012, Electrophoresis.

[31]  M. J. Kim,et al.  Chemically modified solid state nanopores for high throughput nanoparticle separation , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[32]  M. Godin,et al.  Precise control of the size and noise of solid-state nanopores using high electric fields , 2012, Nanotechnology.

[33]  Vivek V. Thacker,et al.  Lipid-coated nanocapillaries for DNA sensing. , 2013, The Analyst.

[34]  O. Otto,et al.  Probing DNA with micro- and nanocapillaries and optical tweezers , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.