Quantifying errors in flow measurement using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of several boundary detection methods.

Quantifying flow from phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) data requires that the vessels of interest be segmented. The estimate of the vessel area will dictate the type and magnitude of the error sources that affect the flow measurement. These sources of errors are well understood, and mathematical expressions have been derived for them in previous work. However, these expressions contain many parameters that render them difficult to use for making practical error estimates. In this work, some realistic assumptions were made that allow for the simplification of such expressions in order to make them more useful. These simplified expressions were then used to numerically simulate the effect of segmentation accuracy and provide some criteria that if met, would keep errors in flow quantification below 10% or 5%. Four different segmentation methods were used on simulated and phantom MRA data to verify the theoretical results. Numerical simulations showed that including partial volumed edge pixels in vessel segmentation provides less error than missing them. This was verified with MRA simulations, as the best performing segmentation method generally included such pixels. Further, it was found that to obtain a flow error of less than 10% (5%), the vessel should be at least 4 (5) pixels in diameter, have an SNR of at least 10:1 and have a peak velocity to saturation cut-off velocity ratio of at least 5:3.

[1]  David Hubbard,et al.  Patients with multiple sclerosis with structural venous abnormalities on MR imaging exhibit an abnormal flow distribution of the internal jugular veins. , 2012, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[2]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[3]  S. Oyre,et al.  Accurate noninvasive quantitation of blood flow, cross-sectional lumen vessel area and wall shear stress by three-dimensional paraboloid modeling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity data. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Hennig,et al.  Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: Optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Automatic vessel segmentation using active contours in cine phase contrast flow measurements , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  David N Firmin,et al.  Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[7]  M. Viergever,et al.  Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Jan-Willem Lankhaar,et al.  Correction of phase offset errors in main pulmonary artery flow quantification , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  D. Parker,et al.  Accuracy of phase‐contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial‐volume effects , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Ming Dong,et al.  Dependence of vessel area accuracy and precision as a function of MR imaging parameters and boundary detection algorithm , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Anders Wåhlin,et al.  Phase contrast MRI quantification of pulsatile volumes of brain arteries, veins, and cerebrospinal fluids compartments: Repeatability and physiological interactions , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Marcel Breeuwer,et al.  Accuracy and precision of vessel area assessment: Manual versus automatic lumen delineation based on full‐width at half‐maximum , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  In vitro validation of phase‐contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: Precision, accuracy, and signal‐to‐noise ratios , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  K. Moser,et al.  On the accuracy of EPI-based phase contrast velocimetry. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  E. Haacke,et al.  Quantitative flow measurements in the internal jugular veins of multiple sclerosis patients using magnetic resonance imaging. , 2012, Reviews on recent clinical trials.

[16]  R L Ehman,et al.  Analysis of systematic and random error in MR volumetric flow measurements , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Assessing arterial blood flow and vessel area variations using real‐time zonal phase‐contrast MRI , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  P. Walker,et al.  Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .