Investigation of the frequency dependent antenna transfer functions and phase center position for modeling off-ground GPR

We compared different methods to estimate the phase center of an ultra wideband ground penetrating radar (GPR) horn antenna operating off-ground, namely, (1) extrapolation of peak-to-peak reflection values in the time domain and assuming a fixed phase center, and (2), frequency-domain full-waveform inversion assuming a frequency dependent phase center. For that purpose, we performed radar measurements at different heights above a perfect electrical conductor (PEC). A double ridged horn antenna operating in the frequency range 0.8-5.2 GHz was used. In the limits of the antenna geometry, we observed that antenna modeling results were not significantly affected by the position of the phase center, even when considering frequency dependence. This implies that the transfer function model used to model the antenna inherently accounts for the phase center position. This analysis showed that the proposed antenna model avoids the need for the frequency dependent phase center determination and is valid for any applications where the field measured by the antenna can be considered as coming from a distance larger than the antenna aperture itself, such as for off-ground GPR or telecommunications.

[1]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  Analysis of air‐launched ground‐penetrating radar techniques to measure the soil surface water content , 2006 .

[2]  Arnold Neumaier,et al.  Global Optimization by Multilevel Coordinate Search , 1999, J. Glob. Optim..

[3]  C. Bruns,et al.  Analysis and Simulation of a 1-18-GHz broadband double-ridged horn antenna , 2003 .

[4]  J. Rashed‐Mohassel,et al.  Design and Optimization of a New 1–18 GHz Double Ridged Guide Horn Antenna , 2007 .

[5]  Evert Slob,et al.  Measuring soil surface water content in irrigated areas of southern Tunisia using full-waveform inversion of proximal GPR data , 2008 .

[6]  M. Vanclooster,et al.  Uniqueness and stability analysis of hydrogeophysical inversion for time‐lapse ground‐penetrating radar estimates of shallow soil hydraulic properties , 2008 .

[7]  Ruediger Vahldieck,et al.  Comprehensive analysis and simulation of a 1-18 GHz broadband parabolic reflector horn antenna system , 2003 .

[8]  Evert Slob,et al.  Remote Estimation of the Hydraulic Properties of a Sand Using Full‐Waveform Integrated Hydrogeophysical Inversion of Time‐Lapse, Off‐Ground GPR Data , 2009 .

[9]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  Electromagnetic Inversion of GPR Signals and Subsequent Hydrodynamic Inversion to Estimate Effective Vadose Zone Hydraulic Properties , 2004 .

[10]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  Measuring the Soil Water Content Profile of a Sandy Soil with an Off‐Ground Monostatic Ground Penetrating Radar , 2004 .

[11]  V. Venkatesan,et al.  Rigorous gain measurements on wide-band ridge horn , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[12]  M. Vanclooster,et al.  Effect of soil roughness on the inversion of off‐ground monostatic GPR signal for noninvasive quantification of soil properties , 2006 .

[13]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  A global multilevel coordinate search procedure for estimating the unsaturated soil hydraulic properties , 2002 .

[14]  Sébastien Lambot Hydrogeophysical characterization of soil using ground penetrating radar , 2003 .

[15]  James D. Taylor,et al.  Introduction to Ultra-Wideband Radar Systems , 1995 .

[16]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  Modeling of ground-penetrating Radar for accurate characterization of subsurface electric properties , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..