The H4b Minor Histocompatibility Antigen Is Caused by a Combination of Genetically Determined and Posttranslational Modifications1

Minor histocompatibility (H) Ag disparities result in graft-vs-host disease and chronic solid allograft rejection in MHC-identical donor-recipient combinations. Minor H Ags are self protein-derived peptides presented by MHC class I molecules. Most arise as a consequence of allelic variation in the bound peptide (p) that results in TCR recognizing the p/MHC as foreign. We used a combinational peptide screening approach to identify the immune dominant H2Kb-restricted epitope defining the mouse H4b minor H Ag. H4b is a consequence of a P3 threonine to isoleucine change in the MHC-bound peptide derived from epithelial membrane protein-3. This allelic variation also leads to phosphorylation of the H4b but not the H4a epitope. Further, ex vivo CD8+ T lymphocytes bind phosphorylated Ag tetramers with high efficiency. Although we document the above process in the minor H Ag system, posttranslational modifications made possible by subtle amino acid changes could also contribute to immunogenicity and immune dominance in tumor immunotherapeutic settings.

[1]  L. Kier,et al.  Amino acid side chain parameters for correlation studies in biology and pharmacology. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[2]  S. Malarkannan,et al.  Real-time T-cell profiling identifies H60 as a major minor histocompatibility antigen in murine graft-versus-host disease. , 2002, Blood.

[3]  E. Choi,et al.  The immunogenomics of minor histocompatibility antigens , 2002, Immunological reviews.

[4]  Eun Young Choi,et al.  Immunodominance of H60 is caused by an abnormally high precursor T cell pool directed against its unique minor histocompatibility antigen peptide. , 2002, Immunity.

[5]  Serge Picard,et al.  The model B6dom1 minor histocompatibility antigen is encoded by a mouse homolog of the yeast STT3 gene , 2002, Immunogenetics.

[6]  H. Grey,et al.  How H13 Histocompatibility Peptides Differing by a Single Methyl Group and Lacking Conventional MHC Binding Anchor Motifs Determine Self-Nonself Discrimination1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[7]  N. Shastri,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Immune Response to Mouse Non-MHC Transplantation Antigens In Vivo: The H60 Histocompatibility Antigen Dominates Over All Others , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[8]  N. Shastri,et al.  Distinguishing Self from Nonself: Immunogenicity of the Murine H47 Locus Is Determined by a Single Amino Acid Substitution in an Unusual Peptide1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[9]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  The Immunogenicity of a New Human Minor Histocompatibility Antigen Results from Differential Antigen Processing , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  Forest M. White,et al.  Phosphorylated Peptides Are Naturally Processed and Presented by Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Molecules in Vivo , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[11]  N. Brouwenstijn,et al.  Differences that matter: major cytotoxic T cell-stimulating minor histocompatibility antigens. , 2000, Immunity.

[12]  J. Frelinger,et al.  Quantitation of CD8+ T-Lymphocyte Responses to Multiple Epitopes from Simian Virus 40 (SV40) Large T Antigen in C57BL/6 Mice Immunized with SV40, SV40 T-Antigen-Transformed Cells, or Vaccinia Virus Recombinants Expressing Full-Length T Antigen or Epitope Minigenes , 2000, Journal of Virology.

[13]  T. Elliott,et al.  Phosphorylated peptides can be transported by TAP molecules, presented by class I MHC molecules, and recognized by phosphopeptide-specific CTL. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[14]  B. Park,et al.  Prevalent CD8(+) T cell response against one peptide/MHC complex in autoimmune diabetes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. Roopenian Minor Histocompatibility Antigens: From the Laboratory to the Clinic , 1999 .

[16]  M. Brehm,et al.  A molecular basis for how a single TCR interfaces multiple ligands. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[17]  N. Shastri,et al.  Positional cloning and molecular characterization of an immunodominant cytotoxic determinant of the mouse H3 minor histocompatibility complex. , 1998, Immunity.

[18]  N. Shastri,et al.  The molecular and functional characterization of a dominant minor H antigen, H60. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[19]  D. Roopenian,et al.  Identification of mimotopes for the H4 minor histocompatibility antigen. , 1998, International immunology.

[20]  P. Paz,et al.  Minors held by majors: the H13 minor histocompatibility locus defined as a peptide/MHC class I complex. , 1997, Immunity.

[21]  T. Mcclanahan,et al.  HNMP-1: A Novel Hematopoietic and Neural Membrane Protein Differentially Regulated in Neural Development and Injury , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  S. Joyce Traffic control of completely assembled MHC class I molecules beyond the endoplasmic reticulum. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  P. Koopman,et al.  An H–YDb epitope is encoded by a novel mouse Y chromosome gene , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[24]  S. Kienle,et al.  Specificity and degeneracy of minor histocompatibility antigen-specific MHC-restricted CTL. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[25]  M. Bevan,et al.  Major histocompatibility complex class I allele‐specific peptide libraries: Identification of peptides that mimic an H‐Y T cell epitope , 1994, European journal of immunology.

[26]  R. Angeletti,et al.  Characterization of an incompletely assembled major histocompatibility class I molecule (H-2Kb) associated with unusually long peptides: implications for antigen processing and presentation. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  William Arbuthnot Sir Lane,et al.  A subset of HLA-B27 molecules contains peptides much longer than nonamers. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  H. Eisen,et al.  A ubiquitous protein is the source of naturally occurring peptides that are recognized by a CD8+ T-cell clone. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  D. Wiley,et al.  The antigenic identity of peptide-MHC complexes: A comparison of the conformations of five viral peptides presented by HLA-A2 , 1993, Cell.

[30]  H. Grey,et al.  Peptide stability in drug development: a comparison of peptide reactivity in different biological media. , 1992, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[31]  R. Korngold,et al.  Immunodominance in the graft-vs-host disease T cell response to minor histocompatibility antigens. , 1990, Journal of immunology.

[32]  C. Perreault,et al.  Minor histocompatibility antigens. , 1990, Blood.

[33]  H. Rammensee,et al.  Characterization of naturally occurring minor histocompatibility peptides including H-4 and H-Y. , 1990, Science.

[34]  G. Klein,et al.  Resistance to H-2-restricted but not to allo-H2-specific graft and cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses in lymphoma mutant. , 1990, Journal of immunology.

[35]  H. Yonekawa,et al.  Maternally transmitted histocompatibility antigen of mice: A hydrophobic peptide of a mitochondrially encoded protein , 1990, Cell.

[36]  H. Rammensee,et al.  Identification of classical minor histocompatibility antigen as cell-derived peptide , 1990, Nature.

[37]  L. Sherman,et al.  Peptide-dependent recognition of H–2Kb by alloreactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes , 1989, Nature.

[38]  P. Wettstein Immunodominance in the T cell response to multiple non-H-2 histocompatibility antigens. III. Single histocompatibility antigens dominate the male antigen. , 1986, Journal of immunology.

[39]  C. Orosz,et al.  Response against single minor histocompatibility antigens. I. Functional and immunogenetic analysis of cloned cytolytic T cells. , 1983, Journal of immunology.

[40]  M. Crumpton,et al.  MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS , 1981 .

[41]  S. Tevethia,et al.  Biology of simian virus 40 (SV40) transplantation antigen (TrAg). V In vitro demonstration of SV40 TrAg in SV40 infected nonpermissive mouse cells by the lymphocyte mediated cytotoxicity assay. , 1979, Virology.

[42]  M. J. Tevethia,et al.  Biology of simian virus 40 (SV40) transplantation antigen (TrAg) II. Isolation and characterization of additional temperature-sensitive mutants of SV40. , 1977, Virology.

[43]  P. Wettstein,et al.  Immunodominance in the immune response to “multiple” histocompatibility antigens , 2004, Immunogenetics.

[44]  D. Roopenian,et al.  The genetic origin of minor histocompatibility antigens , 2004, Immunogenetics.

[45]  J. Yewdell,et al.  Immunodominance in major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted T lymphocyte responses. , 1999, Annual review of immunology.

[46]  H. Yonekawa,et al.  Molecular definition of a mitochondrially encoded mouse minor histocompatibility antigen. , 1989, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.