A niche for neutrality.

Ecologists now recognize that controversy over the relative importance of niches and neutrality cannot be resolved by analyzing species abundance patterns. Here, we use classical coexistence theory to reframe the debate in terms of stabilizing mechanisms (niches) and fitness equivalence (neutrality). The neutral model is a special case where stabilizing mechanisms are absent and species have equivalent fitness. Instead of asking whether niches or neutral processes structure communities, we advocate determining the degree to which observed diversity reflects strong stabilizing mechanisms overcoming large fitness differences or weak stabilization operating on species of similar fitness. To answer this question, we propose combining data on per capita growth rates with models to: (i) quantify the strength of stabilizing processes; (ii) quantify fitness inequality and compare it with stabilization; and (iii) manipulate frequency dependence in growth to test the consequences of stabilization and fitness equivalence for coexistence.

[1]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Dispersal, Environment, and Floristic Variation of Western Amazonian Forests , 2003, Science.

[2]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology , 2003, Nature.

[3]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[4]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Field parameterization and experimental test of the neutral theory of biodiversity , 2005, Nature.

[5]  M. Westoby,et al.  Game-Theoretical Evolution of Seed Mass in Multi-Species Ecological Models , 1997 .

[6]  S. Levin,et al.  Comparing Classical Community Models: Theoretical Consequences for Patterns of Diversity , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[7]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Perturbation Experiments in Community Ecology: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[8]  Kyle E. Harms,et al.  Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest , 2000, Nature.

[9]  M. Rees,et al.  Coexistence and Relative Abundance in Annual Plant Assemblages: The Roles of Competition and Colonization , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[10]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  The consequences of recruitment limitation: reconciling chance, history and competitive differences between plants , 1995 .

[11]  Mark Rees,et al.  Quantifying the Impact of Competition and Spatial Heterogeneity on the Structure and Dynamics of a Four-Species Guild of Winter Annuals , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[12]  C. Cáceres,et al.  Temporal variation, dormancy, and coexistence: a field test of the storage effect. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  K. McConway,et al.  Absence of phylogenetic signal in the niche structure of meadow plant communities , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  G. Bell.  Neutral macroecology. , 2001, Science.

[15]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Predicting competition coefficients for plant mixtures: reciprocity, transitivity and correlations with life‐history traits , 2001 .

[16]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  Neutral theory and community ecology , 2004 .

[17]  Mark H Gromko,et al.  WHAT IS FREQUENCY‐DEPENDENT SELECTION? , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  Peter R. Grant,et al.  Ecology and evolution of Darwin's finches , 1986 .

[19]  Tamar Frankel.  [The theory and the practice...]. , 2001, Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde.

[20]  S. Pacala,et al.  Ecological drift in niche-structured communities: neutral pattern does not imply neutral process , 2005 .

[21]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Hydrologically defined niches reveal a basis for species richness in plant communities , 1999, Nature.

[22]  Jonathan Silvertown,et al.  Plant coexistence and the niche , 2004 .

[23]  B. Beckage,et al.  Density-dependent mortality and the latitudinal gradient in species diversity , 2002, Nature.

[24]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence , 2005 .

[25]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[26]  D. Tilman,et al.  Non-neutral patterns of species abundance in grassland communities. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[27]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in arctic tundra , 2002, Nature.

[28]  E. Borer,et al.  Examining the Relative Importance of Spatial and Nonspatial Coexistence Mechanisms , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[29]  S. Ernest,et al.  Delayed compensation for missing keystone species by colonization. , 2001, Science.

[30]  Robert John,et al.  Nonrandom Processes Maintain Diversity in Tropical Forests , 2006, Science.

[31]  B. Bolker,et al.  Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short Dispersal , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Graham Bell,et al.  The Distribution of Abundance in Neutral Communities , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[33]  S Pacala,et al.  Long-Term Studies of Vegetation Dynamics , 2001, Science.

[34]  Benjamin Gilbert,et al.  Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  James S. Clark,et al.  Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians , 2004 .

[36]  B. McGill.  A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[37]  Graham Bell,et al.  THE CO‐DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES IN RELATION TO THE NEUTRAL THEORY OF COMMUNITY ECOLOGY , 2005 .

[38]  Daniel R. Lynch,et al.  Nonrandom Processes Maintain Diversity in Tropical Forests , 2006 .

[39]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade‐off: a sowing experiment , 1999 .

[40]  J. HilleRisLambers,et al.  Climate variability has a stabilizing effect on the coexistence of prairie grasses , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[42]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Local dispersal can facilitate coexistence in the presence of permanent spatial heterogeneity , 2003 .

[43]  D. Tilman,et al.  Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems , 1996, Nature.

[44]  S. Pimm,et al.  Direct Estimation of Competition , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[45]  P. Grubb.  THE MAINTENANCE OF SPECIES‐RICHNESS IN PLANT COMMUNITIES: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REGENERATION NICHE , 1977 .

[46]  David Tilman,et al.  Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Andrew R. Watkinson,et al.  Density-dependence in single-species populations of plants , 1980 .

[48]  P. Chesson,et al.  The Roles of Harsh and Fluctuating Conditions in the Dynamics of Ecological Communities , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[49]  M. McPeek,et al.  Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. , 2006, Ecology.

[50]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Density dependence explains tree species abundance and diversity in tropical forests , 2005, Nature.

[51]  Brian J. McGill,et al.  Strong and weak tests of macroecological theory , 2003 .

[52]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Niches, rather than neutrality, structure a grassland pioneer guild , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.