Building a foundation for structure‐based cellulosome design for cellulosic ethanol: Insight into cohesin‐dockerin complexation from computer simulation

The organization and assembly of the cellulosome, an extracellular multienzyme complex produced by anaerobic bacteria, is mediated by the high‐affinity interaction of cohesin domains from scaffolding proteins with dockerins of cellulosomal enzymes. We have performed molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations on both the wild type (WT) and D39N mutant of the C. thermocellum Type I cohesin‐dockerin complex in aqueous solution. The D39N mutation has been experimentally demonstrated to disrupt cohesin‐dockerin binding. The present MD simulations indicate that the substitution triggers significant protein flexibility and causes a major change of the hydrogen‐bonding network in the recognition strips—the conserved loop regions previously proposed to be involved in binding—through electrostatic and salt‐bridge interactions between β‐strands 3 and 5 of the cohesin and α‐helix 3 of the dockerin. The mutation‐induced subtle disturbance in the local hydrogen‐bond network is accompanied by conformational rearrangements of the protein side chains and bound water molecules. Additional free energy perturbation calculations of the D39N mutation provide differences in the cohesin‐dockerin binding energy, thus offering a direct, quantitative comparison with experiments. The underlying molecular mechanism of cohesin‐dockerin complexation is further investigated through the free energy profile, that is, potential of mean force (PMF) calculations of WT cohesin‐dockerin complex. The PMF shows a high‐free energy barrier against the dissociation and reveals a stepwise pattern involving both the central β‐sheet interface and its adjacent solvent‐exposed loop/turn regions clustered at both ends of the β‐barrel structure.

[1]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[2]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[3]  J. Wu,et al.  Involvement of Both Dockerin Subdomains in Assembly of the Clostridium thermocellum Cellulosome , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[5]  Olivier Michielin,et al.  Binding free energy differences in a TCR-peptide-MHC complex induced by a peptide mutation: a simulation analysis. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  M. Karplus,et al.  Method for estimating the configurational entropy of macromolecules , 1981 .

[7]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Structural Basis of Cellulosome Efficiency Explored by Small Angle X-ray Scattering* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  The α Helix Dipole: Screened Out? , 2005 .

[9]  K. Sharp,et al.  On the calculation of absolute macromolecular binding free energies , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  David K. Johnson,et al.  Biomass Recalcitrance: Engineering Plants and Enzymes for Biofuels Production , 2007, Science.

[11]  C. Chipot,et al.  Overcoming free energy barriers using unconstrained molecular dynamics simulations. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  W. M. Westler,et al.  Secondary structure and calcium-induced folding of the Clostridium thermocellum dockerin domain determined by NMR spectroscopy. , 2000, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[14]  E. Bayer,et al.  Cohesin–dockerin interaction in cellulosome assembly: a single Asp‐to‐Asn mutation disrupts high‐affinity cohesin–dockerin binding , 2004, FEBS letters.

[15]  B. Brooks,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method , 1995 .

[16]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  The alpha helix dipole: screened out? , 2005, Structure.

[17]  J A McCammon,et al.  Analysis of a 10-ns molecular dynamics simulation of mouse acetylcholinesterase. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[18]  M. Klein,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms , 1994 .

[19]  P. Alzari,et al.  The crystal structure of a type I cohesin domain at 1.7 A resolution. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Harry J. Gilbert,et al.  Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin–dockerin complex , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[22]  E. Bayer,et al.  A cohesin domain from Clostridium thermocellum: the crystal structure provides new insights into cellulosome assembly. , 1997, Structure.

[23]  E. Bayer,et al.  Cellulosomes-structure and ultrastructure. , 1998, Journal of structural biology.

[24]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  Stabilization of protein structure by interaction of α-helix dipole with a charged side chain , 1988, Nature.

[25]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[26]  B. Roux,et al.  Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  C Cambillau,et al.  Crystal structure of a cohesin module from Clostridium cellulolyticum: implications for dockerin recognition. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  Eric Darve,et al.  Assessing the efficiency of free energy calculation methods. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[29]  M. Himmel,et al.  The potential of cellulases and cellulosomes for cellulosic waste management. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[30]  Wim G. J. Hol,et al.  The role of the α-helix dipole in protein function and structure , 1985 .

[31]  E. Bayer,et al.  Cohesin‐dockerin recognition in cellulosome assembly: Experiment versus hypothesis , 2000, Proteins.

[32]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[33]  Pedro M Alzari,et al.  Mapping by site-directed mutagenesis of the region responsible for cohesin-dockerin interaction on the surface of the seventh cohesin domain of Clostridium thermocellum CipA. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[34]  W. M. Westler,et al.  Solution structure of a type I dockerin domain, a novel prokaryotic, extracellular calcium-binding domain. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  FREE ENERGY CALCULATIONS : APPLICATIONS TO CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA , 1993 .

[36]  Christophe Chipot,et al.  Probing a model of a GPCR/ligand complex in an explicit membrane environment: the human cholecystokinin-1 receptor. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[37]  Edward A Bayer,et al.  Evidence for a dual binding mode of dockerin modules to cohesins , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  N. Go,et al.  Effect of solvent on collective motions in globular protein. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Eric F Darve,et al.  Calculating free energies using average force , 2001 .

[40]  M. Karplus,et al.  Collective motions in proteins: A covariance analysis of atomic fluctuations in molecular dynamics and normal mode simulations , 1991, Proteins.

[41]  W. Hol The role of the alpha-helix dipole in protein function and structure. , 1985, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[42]  A Bairoch,et al.  Calcium-binding affinity and calcium-enhanced activity of Clostridium thermocellum endoglucanase D. , 1990, The Biochemical journal.

[43]  M Bycroft,et al.  Stabilization of protein structure by interaction of alpha-helix dipole with a charged side chain. , 1988, Nature.

[44]  Richard H. Henchman,et al.  Revisiting free energy calculations: a theoretical connection to MM/PBSA and direct calculation of the association free energy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[45]  Pedro M Alzari,et al.  Duplicated dockerin subdomains of Clostridium thermocellum endoglucanase CelD bind to a cohesin domain of the scaffolding protein CipA with distinct thermodynamic parameters and a negative cooperativity. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[46]  E Setter,et al.  Organization and distribution of the cellulosome in Clostridium thermocellum , 1985, Journal of bacteriology.

[47]  M. Gilson,et al.  The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[48]  A. Kosugi,et al.  Yutaka Cellulosomes from Mesophilic Bacteria , 2003 .

[49]  E. Bayer,et al.  Species‐specificity of the cohesin‐dockerin interaction between Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium cellulolyticum: Prediction of specificity determinants of the dockerin domain , 1997, Proteins.

[50]  Alessandra Villa,et al.  Incorporating the effect of ionic strength in free energy calculations using explicit ions , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..