On the role of the supramarginal gyrus in phonological processing and verbal working memory: Evidence from rTMS studies

The supramarginal gyrus (SMG) is activated for phonological processing during both language and verbal working memory tasks. Using rTMS, we investigated whether the contribution of the SMG to phonological processing is domain specific (specific to phonology) or more domain general (specific to verbal working memory). A measure of phonological complexity was developed based on sonority differences and subjects were tested after low frequency rTMS on a same/different judgment task and an n-back verbal memory task. It was reasoned that if the phonological processing in the SMG is more domain general, i.e., related to verbal working memory demands, performance would be more affected by the rTMS during the n-back task than during the same/different judgment task. Two auditory experiments were conducted. The first experiment demonstrated that under conditions where working memory demands are minimized (i.e. same/different judgment), repetitive stimulation had no effect on performance although performance varied as a function of phonological complexity. The second experiment demonstrated that during a verbal working memory task (n-back task), where phonological complexity was also manipulated, subjects were less accurate and slower at performing the task after stimulation but the effect of phonology was not affected. The results confirm that the SMG is involved in verbal working memory but not in the encoding of sonority differences.

[1]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Computerized Measures of Verbal Working Memory Performance in Healthy Elderly Participants , 2007 .

[2]  Willy Serniclaes,et al.  Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception , 2005, NeuroImage.

[3]  Z. Nahas,et al.  Motor threshold in transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparison of a neurophysiological method and a visualization of movement method. , 1998, The journal of ECT.

[4]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[5]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The cortical localization of the lexicons. Positron emission tomography evidence. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  The right posterior inferior frontal gyrus contributes to phonological word decisions in the healthy brain: Evidence from dual-site TMS , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Julie A Fiez,et al.  Functional dissociations within the inferior parietal cortex in verbal working memory , 2004, NeuroImage.

[9]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[10]  Valerie Treyer,et al.  Time-course of “off-line” prefrontal rTMS effects — a PET study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[11]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Dissociation of Storage and Rehearsal in Verbal Working Memory: Evidence From Positron Emission Tomography , 1996 .

[12]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Perisylvian language networks of the human brain , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[13]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The Role of Parietal Cortex in Verbal Working Memory , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Joseph T. Devlin,et al.  Supramarginal gyrus involvement in visual word recognition , 2009, Cortex.

[15]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Carol Conrad,et al.  Context effects in sentence comprehension: A study of the subjective lexicon , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  Gregory G. Brown,et al.  Linking mathematical modeling with human neuroimaging to segregate verbal working memory maintenance processes from stimulus encoding. , 2013, Neuropsychology.

[19]  P. Price,et al.  Sonority and Syllabicity: Acoustic Correlates of Perception , 1980, Phonetica.

[20]  Judith A Gierut,et al.  Phonological complexity and language learnability. , 2007, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[21]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  Joseph T. Devlin,et al.  Early and Sustained Supramarginal Gyrus Contributions to Phonological Processing , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[23]  A. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Studies in Cognition: The Problems Solved and Created by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Is developmental dyslexia a disconnection syndrome? Evidence from PET scanning. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  A. Baddeley Working Memory, Thought, and Action , 2007 .

[26]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  Differences in auditory processing of words and pseudowords: An fMRI study , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[27]  Costanza Papagno,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Phonological Short-term Memory: A Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Jonides,et al.  Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. , 1999, Science.

[29]  Niels G. Waller,et al.  Moderated Multiple Regression, Spurious Interaction Effects, and IRT , 2005 .

[30]  J. Jonides,et al.  Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  D. J. Murray Articulation and acoustic confusability in short-term memory. , 1968 .

[32]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[33]  Donca Steriade,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Gestures and autosegments: comments on Browman and Goldstein's paper , 1990 .

[34]  Robert L. Solso,et al.  Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two- through nine-letter English words , 1980 .

[35]  P. Matthews,et al.  Semantic Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Organization of the Human Inferior Parietal Lobule Based on Receptor Architectonics , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Tony Ro,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Disrupting Neural Activity to Alter and Assess Brain Function , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  B. Rosen,et al.  Auditory and visual word processing studied with fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[39]  K. Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal lobule in stereotaxic space , 2008, Brain Structure and Function.

[40]  K. Müller,et al.  Functional architecture of verbal and tonal working memory: An FMRI study , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[41]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[42]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Economy of Speech Gestures , 1983 .

[43]  D. Pandya,et al.  Segmentation of subcomponents within the superior longitudinal fascicle in humans: a quantitative, in vivo, DT-MRI study. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  D. Barch,et al.  Abnormal parietal cortex activation during working memory in schizophrenia: verbal phonological coding disturbances versus domain-general executive dysfunction. , 2007, The American journal of psychiatry.

[45]  P. T. Fox,et al.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing , 1988, Nature.

[46]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory , 1993, Nature.

[47]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Topographical functional connectivity pattern in the perisylvian language networks. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  Daniela Balslev,et al.  Inter-individual variability in optimal current direction for transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[49]  T. Klingberg,et al.  Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Segregating Semantic from Phonological Processes during Reading , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  M. Joanisse,et al.  Modulation of brain regions involved in word recognition by homophonous stimuli: An fMRI study , 2011, Brain Research.

[52]  Bradley R. Buchsbaum,et al.  The Search for the Phonological Store: From Loop to Convolution , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  John E. Desmond,et al.  Enhancement of Phonological Memory Following Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) , 2006, Behavioural neurology.

[54]  C. Degueldre,et al.  Regional brain activity during working memory tasks. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[55]  A. Baddeley Human Memory: Theory and Practice, Revised Edition , 1990 .

[56]  D. Poeppel A Critical Review of PET Studies of Phonological Processing , 1996, Brain and Language.

[57]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[58]  T. Klingberg Training and plasticity of working memory , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  C. Price,et al.  Phonological decisions require both the left and right supramarginal gyri , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  S. Petersen,et al.  A procedure for identifying regions preferentially activated by attention to semantic and phonological relations using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Differential activation of right and left posterior sylvian regions by semantic and phonological tasks: a positron-emission tomography study in normal human subjects , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[62]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. , 1992, Science.

[63]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[64]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[65]  N Burgess,et al.  Recoding, storage, rehearsal and grouping in verbal short-term memory: an fMRI study , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  Mitchel S. Berger,et al.  Analysis of the subcomponents and cortical terminations of the perisylvian superior longitudinal fasciculus: a fiber dissection and DTI tractography study , 2012, Brain Structure and Function.