The need for biological realism in the updating of cellular automata models

Spatially explicit models like cellular automata are widely used in ecology. The spatio-temporal order of events is a new feature of these models that does not have to be considered in equivalent non-spatial models. We considered simple stochastic cellular automata to test sensitivity of model response under different spatial and temporal sequences of events. The results indicate that very important differences in model output can be found as spatio-temporal ordering is changed, even in a very simple model. A careful choice of the way events are evaluated has to be made: the spatio-temporal ordering must be selected to match the biological characteristics of the target ecological system to be modelled. Further, a complete description of the details of this ordering should be specified in order to let others reproduce published simulation experiments.

[1]  Graeme D. Ruxton,et al.  Effects of the spatial and temporal ordering of events on the behaviour of a simple cellular automaton , 1996 .

[2]  P. Hogeweg Cellular automata as a paradigm for ecological modeling , 1988 .

[3]  B A Huberman,et al.  Evolutionary games and computer simulations. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Michael J. Conroy,et al.  Parameter Estimation, Reliability, and Model Improvement for Spatially Explicit Models of Animal Populations , 1995 .

[5]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Experimental Policies for Water Management in the Everglades. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  W. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of Age-Structured and Spatially Structured Predator-Prey Interactions: Individual-Based Models and Population-Level Formulations , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Population Dynamics in Complex Landscapes: A Case Study. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Stochastic Spatial Models: A User's Guide to Ecological Applications , 1994 .

[9]  G Sugihara,et al.  Applications of fractals in ecology. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Michael P. Hassell,et al.  Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics , 1991, Nature.

[11]  O. Inghe,et al.  Genet and ramet survivorship under different mortality regimes—A cellular automata model , 1989 .

[12]  Rick Durrett,et al.  Estimating the critical values of stochastic growth models , 1993, Journal of Applied Probability.

[13]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Cellular automata as models of complexity , 1984, Nature.

[14]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Resource dynamics and vegetation processes: a deterministic model using two-dimensional cellular automata , 1993 .

[15]  Geoffrey M. Henebry,et al.  Spatial model error analysis using autocorrelation indices , 1995 .

[16]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Discounting initial population sizes for prediction of extinction probabilities in patchy environments , 1993 .

[17]  H M Hastings,et al.  Time scales, persistence and patchiness. , 1982, Bio Systems.

[18]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[19]  A. Ellison,et al.  Response of a Wetland Vascular Plant Community to Disturbance: A Simulation Study , 1995 .

[20]  B. Danielson,et al.  Spatially Explicit Population Models: Current Forms and Future Uses , 1995 .

[21]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  A Simulation Model for Shrub Ecosystem in the Semiarid Karoo, South Africa , 1995 .

[22]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[23]  George Sugihara,et al.  Fractals: A User's Guide for the Natural Sciences , 1993 .

[24]  N. Oden,et al.  Adjusting Moran's I for population density. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.