Outpatient DSA in cerebrovascular disease using transbrachial arch injections.

Experience with intravenous digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has proven disappointing in the outpatient evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. Vessel superimposition, patient motion, and poor vascular opacification all prevent definitive studies in a significant percentage of patients. These problems were addressed by turning to an intraarterial outpatient DSA technique composed of several elements: (1) right transbrachial catheterization of the ascending aorta using a thin, multiple side-hole, straight catheter; (2) arch injections of relatively small volumes of contrast material; (3) pulsed digital image acquisition with multiple projections; and (4) a limited period of postprocedure observation. A total of 43 outpatients and 16 inpatients was studied in this manner with only two complications, both local. Images of definitive quality and completeness were obtained in 82%-98% of cases, and included the major intracranial as well as the extracranial vessels and their circulatory dynamics. Because the iodine load per injection was relatively low, up to 10 angiograms per case were available for delineating superimposed anatomy and motion degradation. Variations in cardiac output had little impact on image quality, and the average case required less than 60% of the contrast load routinely used for intravenous DSA. The transbrachial approach proved as safe and convenient as intravenous DSA but was more thorough and dependable.

[1]  W. Foley,et al.  Intravenous DSA examination of patients with suspected cerebral ischemia. , 1984, Radiology.

[2]  J. Hesselink,et al.  Intravenous digital subtraction angiography of arteriosclerotic vertebrobasilar disease. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  A. Gomes,et al.  Limitations in the interpretation of intravenous carotid digital subtraction angiography. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  F. Burbank,et al.  AUR Memorial Award. Determinants of contrast enhancement for intravenous digital subtraction angiography. , 1983, Investigative radiology.

[5]  P A Turski,et al.  Limitations of intravenous digital subtraction angiography. , 1983, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[6]  J. Seeger,et al.  Evaluation of cerebral hemispheric contrast transit with intravenous digital subtraction angiography. , 1983, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  N. Leeds,et al.  Aortic arch digital arteriography: an alternative technique to digital venous angiography and routine arteriography in the evaluation of cerebrovascular insufficiency. , 1983, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[8]  T. Tomsick,et al.  Digital subtraction angiography with intravenous injection: assessment of 1,000 carotid bifurcations. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  L. Kaseff Positional variations of the common carotid artery bifurcation: implications for digital subtraction angiography. , 1982, Radiology.

[10]  N. Hertzer,et al.  Routine surgical management of brachial artery occlusion after cardiac catheterization. , 1982, Archives of surgery.

[11]  I. Awad,et al.  Intravenous digital subtraction angiography: an index of collateral cerebral blood flow in internal carotid artery occlusion. , 1982, Stroke.

[12]  M. Modic,et al.  Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in brain ischemia. , 1982, JAMA.

[13]  P. Weinstein,et al.  Digital video subtraction angiography of the cervical and cerebral vasculature. , 1982, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  W. Chilcote,et al.  Digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries: a comparative study in 100 patients. , 1981, Radiology.

[15]  R A Kruger,et al.  Computerized fluoroscopy: digital subtraction for intravenous angiocardiography and arteriography. , 1980, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Hans Roehrig,et al.  INTRAVENOUS ANGIOGRAPHY USING DIGITAL VIDEO SUBTRACTION , 1980 .

[17]  M. Huckman,et al.  Transfemoral cerebral arteriography versus direct precutaneous carotid and brachial arteriography: a comparison of complication rates. , 1979, Radiology.

[18]  C. Kerber,et al.  Cerebral ischemia. I. Current angiographic techniques, complications, and safety. , 1978, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  C. R. Simmons,et al.  Angiographic evaluation in extracranial vascular occlusive disease. , 1973, Archives of surgery.

[20]  J. Feild,et al.  Complications of 1000 brachial arteriograms. , 1972, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  F. Murtagh,et al.  PERCUTANEOUS RETROGRADE BRACHIAL ARTERIOGRAPHY: A NONOPERATIVE, NONCATHETER TECHNIQUE. , 1965, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[22]  G. Gensini,et al.  Percutaneous aortocerebral angiography. A diagnostic and physiologic method. , 1960, Radiology.

[23]  Å. Lindbom Arterial spasm caused by puncture and catheterization; an arteriographic study of patients not suffering from arterial disease. , 1957, Acta radiologica.

[24]  G. Bargon,et al.  [Complications of cerebral angiography]. , 1984, VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten.

[25]  D. Fergusson,et al.  Percutaneous entry of the brachial artery for left heart catheterization using a sheath. , 1981, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.