Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions

Classic research on the contact hypothesis focused on the direct relationship between the antecedents (conditions under which contact occurs) and the outcomes (primarily, the reduction of prejudice) of intergroup contact. Recent work has taken a broader view of contact processes and effects. We review key developments over the past 20 years, identifying different forms of contact, factors that mediate and moderate the effects of contact, and both the nature and temporal stage and the varied outcomes of contact. We then identify several research directions to address pressing theoretical and practical issues. These issues concern (a) group processes and intergroup relations, (b) intergroup contact in the context of multiple categorization, (c) structural- and individual-level processes, (d) a broader range of individual-level outcomes (e.g., health), and (e) impact on social change. Contact theory and research provides a comprehensive conceptual foundation, allied to a range of powerful empirical techniques, for important new advances and practical applications for improving intergroup relations and producing more equitable outcomes across groups.

[1]  A. Flache,et al.  Extended intergroup friendships within social settings: The moderating role of initial outgroup attitudes , 2013 .

[2]  Norman Miller,et al.  Personalization and the Promise of Contact Theory , 2002 .

[3]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  In Pursuit of Three Theories: Authoritarianism, Relative Deprivation, and Intergroup Contact. , 2016, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  Linda R. Tropp.  Perceived Discrimination and Interracial Contact: Predicting Interracial Closeness among Black and White Americans , 2007 .

[5]  J. Dovidio,et al.  A common ingroup identity: A categorization-based approach for reducing intergroup bias. , 2009 .

[6]  Rhiannon N. Turner,et al.  Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[7]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans , 2018 .

[8]  E. Paluck.  Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: a field experiment in Rwanda. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Rhiannon N. Turner,et al.  Applying imagined contact to improve physiological responses in anticipation of intergroup interactions and the perceived quality of these interactions , 2015 .

[10]  S. Levin,et al.  The Effects of Ingroup and Outgroup Friendships on Ethnic Attitudes in College: A Longitudinal Study , 2003 .

[11]  Rupert Brown,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup contact , 2005 .

[12]  John Dixon,et al.  Beyond prejudice: are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? , 2012, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[13]  Samuel R. Sommers,et al.  Dyadic Interracial Interactions: a Meta-analysis , 2012 .

[14]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Fifty-odd years of inter-group contact: from hypothesis to integrated theory. , 2011, The British journal of social psychology.

[15]  Ulrich Wagner,et al.  Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta‐analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions , 2015 .

[16]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  When extended contact opens the door to future contact , 2011 .

[17]  Anthony F. Heath,et al.  Predicting support for collective action in the conflict between Turks and Kurds: Perceived threats as a mediator of intergroup contact and social identity , 2016 .

[18]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Refining the association between intergroup contact and intergroup forgiveness in Northern Ireland: Type of contact, prior conflict experience, and group identification , 2015 .

[19]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: the mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Mark Rubin,et al.  Intergroup bias. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact , 2014 .

[22]  Predictors of ingroup projection: The roles of superordinate category coherence and complexity , 2010 .

[23]  D. Abrams,et al.  An age apart: the effects of intergenerational contact and stereotype threat on performance and intergroup bias. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[24]  Elizabeth A Pascoe,et al.  Interpersonal Discrimination and Physical Health , 2018 .

[25]  Samuel R. Sommers,et al.  When the half affects the whole: Priming identity for biracial individuals in social interactions , 2013 .

[26]  Michael Wenzel,et al.  Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model , 2007 .

[27]  Stephen C. Wright,et al.  Friend or Ally , 2013, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[28]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  Whistling Vivaldi: And Other Clues to How Stereotypes Affect Us , 2010 .

[29]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice , 1997 .

[31]  C. Tredoux,et al.  Mediators of the Contact–Prejudice Relation among South African Students on Four University Campuses , 2010 .

[32]  Stephen C. Wright,et al.  The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. , 1997 .

[33]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Insecure Status Relations Shape Preferences for the Content of Intergroup Contact , 2013, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[34]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Cross-Group Friendships and Intergroup Attitudes , 2011, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[35]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators , 2008 .

[37]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  The Single Factor Fallacy: Implications of Missing Critical Variables from an Analysis of Intergroup Contact Theory1 , 2017 .

[38]  R. Crisp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis , 2014 .

[39]  Felicia Pratto,et al.  The Irony of Harmony , 2009, Psychological science.

[40]  Mark Rubin,et al.  Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries , 2014 .

[41]  Nurit Shnabel,et al.  Intergroup reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional processes and the needs-based model , 2015 .

[42]  M. Verkuyten,et al.  Intergroup Contact and Ingroup Reappraisal: Examining the Deprovincialization Thesis , 2010 .

[43]  Dean E. Hewes,et al.  The Parasocial Contact Hypothesis , 2005 .

[44]  Katharina Schmid,et al.  Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact via social identity complexity. , 2014, The British journal of social psychology.

[45]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Intergroup Contact , 2017, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[46]  Glynis M. Breakwell,et al.  The Social Psychological Approach , 1982 .

[47]  Stephen C. Wright,et al.  The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction. , 2009 .

[48]  J Tudor-Hart,et al.  On the nature of prejudice. , 1961, The Eugenics review.

[49]  J. Dovidio,et al.  A Social Psychological Approach to Improving the Outcomes of Racially Discordant Medical Interactions , 2013, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[50]  R. Hardeman,et al.  Informal Training Experiences and Explicit Bias against African Americans among Medical Students , 2017, Social psychology quarterly.

[51]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Relationships Between Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Among Minority and Majority Status Groups , 2005, Psychological science.

[52]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Beyond the dyadic perspective: 10 Reasons for using social network analysis in intergroup contact research , 2017, The British journal of social psychology.

[53]  Hisham M. Abu-Rayya,et al.  Achieving twelve-months of intergroup bias reduction: The dual identity-electronic contact (DIEC) experiment , 2014 .

[54]  Katharina Schmid,et al.  Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Katharina Schmid,et al.  Developmental Dynamics of Intergroup Contact and Intergroup Attitudes: Long-Term Effects in Adolescence and Early Adulthood. , 2016, Child development.

[56]  R. Hardeman,et al.  Medical School Experiences Associated with Change in Implicit Racial Bias Among 3547 Students: A Medical Student CHANGES Study Report , 2015, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[57]  J. N. Shelton,et al.  To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  E. Page‐Gould,et al.  How Can Intergroup Interaction Be Bad If Intergroup Contact Is Good? Exploring and Reconciling an Apparent Paradox in the Science of Intergroup Relations , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[59]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Racial healthcare disparities: A social psychological analysis , 2013, European review of social psychology.

[60]  D. Abrams,et al.  Come together: longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew's reformulated intergroup contact model and the Common Ingroup Identity Model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts , 2004 .

[61]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Toward Immigrants in Italy: The Mediational Role of Anxiety and the Moderational Role of Group Salience , 2003 .

[62]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  The Contact Hypothesis Reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[63]  M. Banaji,et al.  PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE IAT 1 RUNNING HEAD : PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE IAT Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test : III . Meta-analysis of Predictive Validity , 2006 .

[64]  Katharina Schmid,et al.  Effects of majority members' positive intergroup contact on minority members' support for ingroup rights: Mobilizing or demobilizing effects? , 2016 .

[65]  J. Berry,et al.  Acculturation , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[66]  J. Dovidio.  Bridging intragroup processes and intergroup relations: needing the twain to meet. , 2013, The British journal of social psychology.

[67]  Nicole Tausch,et al.  How Does Intergroup Contact Affect Social Change? Its Impact on Collective Action and Individual Mobility Intentions among Members of a Disadvantaged Group , 2015 .

[68]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Patient Stigma, Medical Interactions, and Health Care Disparities: A Selective Review , 2018 .

[69]  Jens F. Binder,et al.  Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.