Assessing spatial and temporal connectivity between surface water and groundwater in a regional catchment: Implications for regional scale water quantity and quality

It is common for surface water–groundwater interaction assessments to investigate river reaches at a local scale and as discrete individual systems, which are generally classified as connected (gaining and losing type systems) or disconnected (transitional or completely disconnected type systems). While these classifications are valid at any point in space and time, studies often fail to consider how individual river reaches function in the context of the entire regional river system (comprising multiple river reaches) and what implications this can have on water quantity and quality. In this study, spatial and temporal assessments were made in a regional catchment using hydraulic, hydrochemical, and tracer-based techniques to determine the source and loss terms of the river and groundwater system and how their relative magnitude changes along the river from the catchment headwaters towards the sea. Applying an entire regional river system assessment we demonstrate that the state of connection can change along river reaches, as well as take place concurrently at the same location. Water level data, together with salinity and stable isotope results showed that the relatively low salinity of the fresh water river system was maintained in an otherwise saline regional groundwater system by virtue of the lack of saline groundwater inputs in a river with a dominantly losing connectivity state. This losing state was strongly influenced by the high evapotranspiration of the native vegetation. By determining the state of connection between surface water and groundwater and understanding the variable and complex nature of contiguous river reaches of an entire regional river system more appropriate management practices can be employed.

[1]  Andrew T. Fisher,et al.  Differential gauging and tracer tests resolve seepage fluxes in a strongly-losing stream , 2006 .

[2]  U. Sansone,et al.  Some limitations in using 222Rn to assess river–groundwater interactions: the case of Castel di Sangro alluvial plain (central Italy) , 2008 .

[3]  P. Hamilton,et al.  Weathering rates and 87Sr/86Sr ratios: An isotopic approach , 1989 .

[4]  Peter G. Cook,et al.  Quantifying groundwater discharge to Cockburn River, southeastern Australia, using dissolved gas tracers 222Rn and SF6 , 2006 .

[5]  K. Ellins,et al.  Using 222Rn to examine groundwater/surface discharge interaction in the Rio Grande de Manati, Puerto Rico , 1990 .

[6]  Graham E Fogg,et al.  River‐Aquifer Interactions, Geologic Heterogeneity, and Low‐Flow Management , 2006, Ground water.

[7]  G. Faure Principles of isotope geology , 1977 .

[8]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  Evaluating the Reliability of the Stream Tracer Approach to Characterize Stream‐Subsurface Water Exchange , 1996 .

[9]  F. Reinstorf,et al.  Measuring methods for groundwater – surface water interactions: a review , 2006 .

[10]  M. Sklash,et al.  The Role Of Groundwater In Storm Runoff , 1979 .

[11]  G. Fox,et al.  Unsaturated hyporheic zone flow in stream/aquifer conjunctive systems , 2003 .

[12]  Patrick J. Mulholland,et al.  Streams and Ground Waters , 1999 .

[13]  M. Sophocleous Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science , 2002 .

[14]  A. Herczeg,et al.  A rapid field extraction method for determination of radon‐222 in natural waters by liquid scintillation counting , 2006 .

[15]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Channel water balance and exchange with subsurface flow along a mountain headwater stream in Montana, United States , 2009 .

[16]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  1 – Quantifying Hydrologic Interactions between Streams and Their Subsurface Hyporheic Zones , 2000 .

[17]  R. Bell,et al.  Groundwater response to reforestation in the Darling Range of Western Australia , 1990 .

[18]  E. Gibson,et al.  Extraction technique for the determination of oxygen-18 in water using preevacuated glass vials. , 1992, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  Andrew T. Fisher,et al.  Quantifying surface water–groundwater interactions using time series analysis of streambed thermal records: Method development , 2006 .

[20]  Tom G. Chapman,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for stream flow recession and baseflow separation , 1999 .

[21]  Glen R. Walker,et al.  Land clearance and river salinisation in the western Murray Basin, Australia , 1990 .

[22]  B. Öhlander,et al.  Ba/Sr, Ca/Sr and 87Sr/86Sr ratios in soil water and groundwater: implications for relative contributions to stream water discharge , 2000 .

[23]  A. Shapiro Cautions and Suggestions for Geochemical Sampling in Fractured Rock , 2002 .

[24]  C. Simmons,et al.  Hydrogeologic controls on disconnection between surface water and groundwater , 2009 .

[25]  C. Twidale,et al.  The age of the lateritized summit surface on Kangaroo Island and adjacent areas of South Australia , 1974 .

[26]  C. Nichol,et al.  Hydrogeochemical and isotopic constraints on the origins of dryland salinity, Murray Basin, Victoria, Australia , 2004 .

[27]  W. Woessner Stream and Fluvial Plain Ground Water Interactions: Rescaling Hydrogeologic Thought , 2000 .

[28]  Effects of stream‐aquifer disconnection on local flow patterns , 2008 .

[29]  George F. Pinder,et al.  Determination of the ground‐water component of peak discharge from the chemistry of total runoff , 1969 .

[30]  Peter G Cook,et al.  Disconnected Surface Water and Groundwater: From Theory to Practice , 2011, Ground water.

[31]  G. Fogg,et al.  Influence of perched groundwater on base flow , 2008 .

[32]  P. Cook,et al.  Determining natural groundwater influx to a tropical river using radon, chlorofluorocarbons and ionic environmental tracers , 2003 .

[33]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Quantifying the relative contributions of riparian and hillslope zones to catchment runoff , 2003 .

[34]  A. Love,et al.  Sr isotopes in natural waters: Applications to source characterisation and water–rock interaction in contrasting landscapes , 2009 .

[35]  Michael Bruen,et al.  Modelling stream -aquifer seepage in an alluvial aquifer: an improved loosing-stream package for MODFLOW , 2002 .

[36]  Craig T. Simmons,et al.  Spatial and temporal aspects of the transition from connection to disconnection between rivers, lakes and groundwater , 2009 .

[37]  D. Gooddy,et al.  87Sr/86Sr as an indicator of flowpaths and weathering rates in the Plynlimon experimental catchments, Wales, U.K. , 2007 .

[38]  C. Ruehl,et al.  Spatial and temporal variations in streambed hydraulic conductivity quantified with time-series thermal methods , 2010 .

[39]  C. Simmons,et al.  Fractured bedrock and saprolite hydrogeologic controls on groundwater/surface-water interaction: a conceptual model (Australia) , 2009 .