Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex

Psychophysical evidence in humans indicates that localization is different for stationary flashed and coherently moving objects. To address how the primary visual cortex represents object position we used a population approach that pools spiking activity of many neurones in cat area 17. In response to flashed stationary squares (0.4 deg) we obtained localized activity distributions in visual field coordinates, which we referred to as profiles across a ‘population receptive field’ (PRF). We here show how motion trajectories can be derived from activity across the PRF and how the representation of moving and flashed stimuli differs in position. We found that motion was represented by peaks of population activity that followed the stimulus with a speed‐dependent lag. However, time‐to‐peak latencies were shorter by ∼16 ms compared to the population responses to stationary flashes. In addition, motion representation showed a directional bias, as latencies were more reduced for peripheral‐to‐central motion compared to the opposite direction. We suggest that a moving stimulus provides ‘preactivation’ that allows more rapid processing than for a single flash event.

[1]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Real-time optical imaging of naturally evoked electrical activity in intact frog brain , 1984, Nature.

[2]  G. Orban,et al.  Velocity selectivity in the cat visual system. I. Responses of LGN cells to moving bar stimuli: a comparison with cortical areas 17 and 18. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  M. Lappe,et al.  Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  P Cavanagh,et al.  The Position of Moving Objects , 2000, Science.

[5]  M. Hawken,et al.  Psychophysics: Threshold Measurements Interaction of Motion and Color in the Visual Pathways , 2022 .

[6]  G. Schöner,et al.  The distribution of neuronal population activation (DPA) as a tool to study interaction and integration in cortical representations , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  W. H. Ehrenstein,et al.  A constant latency difference determines directional anisotropy in visual motion perception , 1991, Vision Research.

[9]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[10]  D Jancke,et al.  Comparative population analysis of cortical representations in parametric spaces of visual field and skin: a unifying role for nonlinear interactions as a basis for active information processing across modalities. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[11]  D. Fitzpatrick Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Receptive fields of simple cells in the cat striate cortex , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  F. Chavane,et al.  Imaging cortical correlates of illusion in early visual cortex , 2004, Nature.

[14]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina , 1999, Nature.

[15]  R. Frostig,et al.  Cortical point-spread function and long-range lateral interactions revealed by real-time optical imaging of macaque monkey primary visual cortex , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Neuronal Processing Delays Are Compensated in the Sensorimotor Branch of the Visual System , 2003, Current Biology.

[17]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Sensorimotor integration compensates for visual localization errors during smooth pursuit eye movements. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  W. Metzger,et al.  Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindungszeit , 1932 .

[19]  R. Reid,et al.  Synaptic Integration in Striate Cortical Simple Cells , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position , 1999, Vision Research.

[21]  C. Bonnet TWO SYSTEMS IN THE DETECTION OF VISUAL MOTION * , 1984, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[22]  Charles H. Anderson,et al.  BASIC ELEMENTS OF BIOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[23]  J. Allman,et al.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. , 1999 .

[25]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[26]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.

[27]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. , 2000, Science.

[28]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Book Review , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Kuno Kirschfeld,et al.  The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast , 1999, Vision Research.

[30]  O. Andreassen,et al.  Mice Deficient in Cellular Glutathione Peroxidase Show Increased Vulnerability to Malonate, 3-Nitropropionic Acid, and 1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,5,6-Tetrahydropyridine , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: The Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  A. Hughes Topographical relationships between the anatomy and physiology of the rabbit visual system , 1971, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[33]  F Bremmer,et al.  Directional asymmetry of neurons in cortical areas MT and MST projecting to the NOT-DTN in macaques. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  S. Mateeff,et al.  Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away , 1988, Vision Research.

[35]  J. Schauer,et al.  Extrapolating Movement without Retinal Motion , 2022 .

[36]  D. Mackay Perceptual Stability of a Stroboscopically Lit Visual Field containing Self-Luminous Objects , 1958, Nature.

[37]  Professor Dr. Guy A. Orban Neuronal Operations in the Visual Cortex , 1983, Studies of Brain Function.

[38]  L. Palmer,et al.  The two-dimensional spatial structure of nonlinear subunits in the receptive fields of complex cells , 1990, Vision Research.

[39]  G. Orban,et al.  Velocity sensitivity mechanisms in cat visual cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Amir C. Akhavan,et al.  Parametric Population Representation of Retinal Location: Neuronal Interaction Dynamics in Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  T. Radil,et al.  Selective directional sensitivity in visual motion perception , 1991, Vision Research.

[42]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Vector reconstruction from firing rates , 1994, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[43]  Gopathy Purushothaman,et al.  Moving ahead through differential visual latency , 1998, Nature.

[44]  D Jancke,et al.  Orientation Formed by a Spot's Trajectory: A Two-Dimensional Population Approach in Primary Visual Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Responses to visual contours: spatio‐temporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurones , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  W. Freeman Mesoscopic neurodynamics: From neuron to brain , 2000, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[47]  Christopher R. Stambaugh,et al.  Simultaneous encoding of tactile information by three primate cortical areas , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  V. Bringuier,et al.  Horizontal propagation of visual activity in the synaptic integration field of area 17 neurons. , 1999, Science.

[49]  D. Baylor,et al.  Mosaic arrangement of ganglion cell receptive fields in rabbit retina. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Simple cells in cat striate cortex: responses to stationary flashing and to moving light bars , 1985, Experimental Brain Research.