Stability of Whole Brain and Regional Network Topology within and between Resting and Cognitive States

Background Graph-theory based analyses of resting state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data have been used to map the network organization of the brain. While numerous analyses of resting state brain organization exist, many questions remain unexplored. The present study examines the stability of findings based on this approach over repeated resting state and working memory state sessions within the same individuals. This allows assessment of stability of network topology within the same state for both rest and working memory, and between rest and working memory as well. Methodology/Principal Findings fMRI scans were performed on five participants while at rest and while performing the 2-back working memory task five times each, with task state alternating while they were in the scanner. Voxel-based whole brain network analyses were performed on the resulting data along with analyses of functional connectivity in regions associated with resting state and working memory. Network topology was fairly stable across repeated sessions of the same task, but varied significantly between rest and working memory. In the whole brain analysis, local efficiency, Eloc, differed significantly between rest and working memory. Analyses of network statistics for the precuneus and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex revealed significant differences in degree as a function of task state for both regions and in local efficiency for the precuneus. Conversely, no significant differences were observed across repeated sessions of the same state. Conclusions/Significance These findings suggest that network topology is fairly stable within individuals across time for the same state, but also fluid between states. Whole brain voxel-based network analyses may prove to be a valuable tool for exploring how functional connectivity changes in response to task demands.

[1]  Manuel S. Schröter,et al.  Spatiotemporal Reconfiguration of Large-Scale Brain Functional Networks during Propofol-Induced Loss of Consciousness , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[3]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[4]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  Comparison of characteristics between region-and voxel-based network analyses in resting-state fMRI data , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[9]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  G. Cecchi,et al.  Scale-free brain functional networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[14]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article Materials and Methods Study Participants , 2022 .

[15]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[16]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:368–372(1998) � Independent Component Analysis of fMRI Data: Examining the Assumptions , 2022 .

[17]  Dominik Heider,et al.  Impact of Working Memory Load on fMRI Resting State Pattern in Subsequent Resting Phases , 2009, PloS one.

[18]  A. Cavanna,et al.  The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  O. Dietrich,et al.  Test–retest reproducibility of the default‐mode network in healthy individuals , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[20]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Yong He,et al.  Graph Theoretical Analysis of Functional Brain Networks: Test-Retest Evaluation on Short- and Long-Term Resting-State Functional MRI Data , 2011, PloS one.

[23]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  Changes in Cognitive State Alter Human Functional Brain Networks , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Cortical Hubs Revealed by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity: Mapping, Assessment of Stability, and Relation to Alzheimer's Disease , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Peter Fransson,et al.  The precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex plays a pivotal role in the default mode network: Evidence from a partial correlation network analysis , 2008, NeuroImage.

[26]  A. Stevens,et al.  Functional Brain Network Modularity Captures Inter- and Intra-Individual Variation in Working Memory Capacity , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  M D'Esposito,et al.  The roles of prefrontal brain regions in components of working memory: effects of memory load and individual differences. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.