Investigating the Amazon Mechanical Turk Market Through Tool Design

We developed TurkBench to better understand the work of crowdworkers on the Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) marketplace. While we aimed to reduce the amount of invisible, unpaid work that these crowdworkers performed, we also probed the day-to-day practices of crowdworkers. Through this probe we encountered a number of previously unreported difficulties that are representative of the difficulties that crowdworkers face in both building their own tools and working on AMT. In this article, our contributions are insights into 1) a number of breakdowns that are occurring on AMT and 2) how the AMT platform is being appropriated in ways that, at the same time, mitigate some breakdowns while exacerbating others. The breakdowns that we specifically discuss in this paper, are the increasing velocity of the market (good HITs are grabbed within seconds), the high amount of flexibility that requesters can and do exercise in specifying their HITs, and the difficulty crowdworkers had in navigating the market due to the large amount of variation in how HITs were constructed by requesters. When the velocity of the market is combined with a poor search interface, a large amount in variation in how HITs are constructed, and little infrastructural support for workers, the resulting work environment can be frustrating and difficult to thrive in.

[1]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  We Are Dynamo: Overcoming Stalling and Friction in Collective Action for Crowd Workers , 2015, CHI.

[2]  Jacki O'Neill,et al.  Turk-Life in India , 2014, GROUP.

[3]  M. Six Silberman,et al.  Turkopticon: interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk , 2013, CHI.

[4]  Brendan Walker,et al.  Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty , 2004, INTR.

[5]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Human computation: a survey and taxonomy of a growing field , 2011, CHI.

[6]  Alek Felstiner Working the Crowd: Employment and Labor Law in the Crowdsourcing Industry , 2011 .

[7]  David B. Martin,et al.  TurkBench: Rendering the Market for Turkers , 2015, CHI.

[8]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  The future of crowd work , 2013, CSCW.

[9]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk marketplace , 2010, XRDS.

[10]  Chris Callison-Burch,et al.  Crowd-Workers: Aggregating Information Across Turkers to Help Them Find Higher Paying Work , 2014, HCOMP.

[11]  James Davis,et al.  Evaluating and improving the usability of Mechanical Turk for low-income workers in India , 2010, ACM DEV '10.

[12]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods , 2011, CHI.

[13]  Paul Dourish,et al.  How HCI interprets the probes , 2007, CHI.

[14]  Jacki O'Neill,et al.  Being a turker , 2014, CSCW.

[15]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[16]  Jacki O'Neill,et al.  Relationship-based business process crowdsourcing? , 2014 .

[17]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[18]  Lydia B. Chilton,et al.  Task search in a human computation market , 2010, HCOMP '10.

[19]  Bill Tomlinson,et al.  Sellers' problems in human computation markets , 2010, HCOMP '10.

[20]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Web workers unite! addressing challenges of online laborers , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.