Regression Models for the Prediction of Poplar Particleboard Properties based on Urea Formaldehyde Resin Content and Board Density

The aim of this study was to explore the minimum amount of urea formaldehyde (UF) resin content and optimum particleboard density while maintaining boards’ quality to reduce production costs. Board density at three levels (520, 620 and 720 kg m -3 ) and resin content (6, 7 and 8%) were variable parameters. Stepwise multivariate linear regression models were used to evaluate the influence of board density and resin content on board properties and to determine the most effective parameter. In order to obtain the optimum board density and minimum resin content, contour plots were drawn. Regression models indicated that both board density and resin content were included in Modulus of Rupture (MOR) and Modulus of Elasticity (MOE) models based on the degree of their importance. Internal Bond (IB) model only had one step and resin content positively affected it. The results obtained from contour plots revealed that manufacturing poplar particleboards with density ranging from 600 to 650 kg m -3 and 6% resin would result in boards with mechanical properties within those required by the corresponding standard. Thickness swelling (TS) values were slightly higher (poorer) than the requirements. The panels required additional treatments such as using adequate amount of water resistant materials to improve thickness swelling after 2 and 24 hours of immersion.

[1]  L. García Esteban,et al.  Prediction of standard particleboard mechanical properties utilizing an artificial neural network and subsequent comparison with a multivariate regression model , 2008 .

[2]  D. Dickmann,et al.  Poplar culture in North America , 2001 .

[3]  Sumin Kim,et al.  Environment-friendly adhesives for surface bonding of wood-based flooring using natural tannin to reduce formaldehyde and TVOC emission. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[4]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Predicting the pressure coefficients in a naturally ventilated test room using artificial neural networks , 2003 .

[5]  Roger M. Rowell,et al.  Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. , 2005 .

[6]  Thomas M. Maloney,et al.  Modern Particleboard & Dry Process Fiberboard Manufacturing , 1993 .

[7]  Deborah F. Cook,et al.  Predicting the internal bond strength of particleboard, utilizing a radial basis function neural network , 1997 .

[8]  D. Kretschmann,et al.  Properties and utilization of poplar wood , 2001 .

[9]  B. Mohebby,et al.  Moisture Repellent Effect of Acetylation on Poplar Fibers , 2008 .

[10]  S. Hiziroglu,et al.  Surface characteristics of wood composites manufactured in Thailand , 2004 .

[11]  Amir Nourbakhsh,et al.  Effect of press cycle time and resin content on physical and mechanical properties of particleboard panels made from the underutilized low-quality raw materials , 2008 .

[12]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[13]  D. Zhou A study of oriented structural board made from hybrid poplar , 1989, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[14]  Wei Sha,et al.  Modelling the correlation between processing parameters and properties in titanium alloys using artificial neural network , 2000 .

[15]  K. Fukuda,et al.  Effect of board density on bending properties and dimensional stabilities of MDF-reinforced corrugated particleboard , 2003, Journal of Wood Science.

[16]  Gökay Nemli,et al.  Evaluation of some of the properties of particleboard as function of manufacturing parameters , 2007 .

[17]  G. Nemli Factors Affecting the Production of E1 Type Particleboard , 2002 .

[18]  Walter F. Mueggler,et al.  Utilization and marketing as tools for aspen management in the Rocky Mountains: Proceedings of the symposium, Sept. 8-9, 1976, Fort Collins, Colorado. Panel II. Aspen ecology and harvesting responses , 1976 .

[19]  S. Hiziroglu,et al.  Some of the properties of particleboard made from paulownia , 2005, Journal of Wood Science.

[20]  C. Paquot,et al.  2.101 – Determination of the Density , 1979 .