Loop modeling: Sampling, filtering, and scoring

We describe a fast and accurate protocol, LoopBuilder, for the prediction of loop conformations in proteins. The procedure includes extensive sampling of backbone conformations, side chain addition, the use of a statistical potential to select a subset of these conformations, and, finally, an energy minimization and ranking with an all‐atom force field. We find that the Direct Tweak algorithm used in the previously developed LOOPY program is successful in generating an ensemble of conformations that on average are closer to the native conformation than those generated by other methods. An important feature of Direct Tweak is that it checks for interactions between the loop and the rest of the protein during the loop closure process. DFIRE is found to be a particularly effective statistical potential that can bias conformation space toward conformations that are close to the native structure. Its application as a filter prior to a full molecular mechanics energy minimization both improves prediction accuracy and offers a significant savings in computer time. Final scoring is based on the OPLS/SBG‐NP force field implemented in the PLOP program. The approach is also shown to be quite successful in predicting loop conformations for cases where the native side chain conformations are assumed to be unknown, suggesting that it will prove effective in real homology modeling applications. Proteins 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[2]  C. Levinthal,et al.  Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformation. I. Ensembles of random conformations for ringlike structures , 1987, Biopolymers.

[3]  R. Huber,et al.  Accurate Bond and Angle Parameters for X-ray Protein Structure Refinement , 1991 .

[4]  B. Honig,et al.  Evaluation of the conformational free energies of loops in proteins , 1994, Proteins.

[5]  R. Samudrala,et al.  An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  U. Lessel,et al.  Importance of anchor group positioning in protein loop prediction , 1999, Proteins.

[7]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  A. Sali,et al.  Modeling of loops in protein structures , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  Weizhong Li,et al.  Calculation of Protein Surface Loops Using Monte-Carlo Simulated Annealing Simulation , 2000 .

[10]  J. Moult,et al.  SNPs, protein structure, and disease , 2001, Human mutation.

[11]  Z. Xiang,et al.  Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Cinque S. Soto,et al.  Evaluating conformational free energies: The colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Hongyi Zhou,et al.  Distance‐scaled, finite ideal‐gas reference state improves structure‐derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[14]  Michael J. Cahill,et al.  On the kinematics of protein folding , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[15]  Adrian A Canutescu,et al.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  K. Zhou,et al.  The role of loop 7 in mediating calcineurin regulation. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[17]  M. DePristo,et al.  Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: Efficient generation of accurate, representative ensembles , 2003, Proteins.

[18]  M. DePristo,et al.  Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: Accuracy of loop decoy discrimination by an all‐atom statistical potential and the AMBER force field with the Generalized Born solvation model , 2003, Proteins.

[19]  Charles D Schwieters,et al.  The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package. , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[20]  A. Goede,et al.  Loops In Proteins (LIP)--a comprehensive loop database for homology modelling. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[21]  B. Honig,et al.  A hierarchical approach to all‐atom protein loop prediction , 2004, Proteins.

[22]  Lei Shi,et al.  The second extracellular loop of the dopamine D2 receptor lines the binding-site crevice. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  A. Fiser Protein structure modeling in the proteomics era , 2004, Expert review of proteomics.

[24]  D. Baker,et al.  Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with rosetta , 2004, Proteins.

[25]  David Baker,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta , 2004, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D.

[26]  Song Liu,et al.  Accurate and efficient loop selections by the DFIRE‐based all‐atom statistical potential , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[27]  B. Honig,et al.  Protein structure prediction: inroads to biology. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[28]  G. Marshall,et al.  Modeling flexible loops in the dark-adapted and activated states of rhodopsin, a prototypical G-protein-coupled receptor. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[29]  R. Friesner,et al.  Long loop prediction using the protein local optimization program , 2006, Proteins.

[30]  Li Xie,et al.  Structural refinement of protein segments containing secondary structure elements: Local sampling, knowledge‐based potentials, and clustering , 2006, Proteins.