MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential value of MR elastography (MRE) in the characterization of solid liver tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-four liver tumors (14 metastatic lesions, 12 hepatocellular carcinomas, nine hemangiomas, five cholangiocarcinomas, three cases of focal nodular hyperplasia, and one hepatic adenoma) were evaluated with MRE. MRE was performed with a 1.5-T system with a modified phase-contrast gradient-echo sequence to collect axial wave images sensitized along the through-plane motion direction. The tumors were identified on T2- and T1-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, and the MRE images were obtained through the tumor. A stiffness map (elastogram) was generated in an automated process consisting of an inversion algorithm. The mean shear stiffness of the tumor was calculated with a manually specified region of interest over the tumor in the stiffness map. The stiffness value of tumor-free hepatic parenchyma was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed on the stiffness values for differentiation of normal liver, fibrotic liver, benign tumors, and malignant tumors. RESULTS Malignant liver tumors had significantly greater mean shear stiffness than benign tumors (10.1 kPa vs 2.7 kPa, p < 0.001), fibrotic liver (10.1 kPa vs 5.9 kPa, p < 0.001), and normal liver (10.1 kPa vs 2.3 kPa, p < 0.001). Fibrotic livers had stiffness values overlapping both the benign and the malignant tumors. A cutoff value of 5 kPa accurately differentiated malignant tumors from benign tumors and normal liver parenchyma in this preliminary investigation. CONCLUSION MR elastography is a promising noninvasive technique for assessing solid liver tumors. Use of MRE may lead to new quantitative tissue characterization parameters for differentiating benign and malignant liver tumors.

[1]  Francis A. Duck,et al.  Physical properties of tissue : a comprehensive reference book , 1990 .

[2]  F. Duck Ionising Radiation and Tissue , 1990 .

[3]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[4]  A. Manduca,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. , 1995, Science.

[5]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[6]  B. Garra,et al.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. , 1997, Radiology.

[7]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Three‐dimensional adaptive filtering in magnetic resonance angiography , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  L Pagliaro,et al.  Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. , 2001, Journal of hepatology.

[9]  J. F. Greenleaf,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography: Non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  A. Manduca,et al.  MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  D. Cochlin,et al.  Elastography in the detection of prostatic cancer. , 2002, Clinical radiology.

[12]  Michael Beil,et al.  Sphingosylphosphorylcholine regulates keratin network architecture and visco-elastic properties of human cancer cells , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[13]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Spatio-temporal Directional Filtering for Improved Inversion of MR Elastography Images , 2002, MICCAI.

[14]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Pathology: Cancer cells compress intratumour vessels , 2004, Nature.

[15]  Matthew J. Paszek,et al.  The Tension Mounts: Mechanics Meets Morphogenesis and Malignancy , 2004, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[16]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[17]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  K. Togashi,et al.  Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. , 2005, Radiology.

[19]  J. Bruix,et al.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma , 2005, Hepatology.

[20]  Richard L Ehman,et al.  MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results. , 2006, Radiology.

[21]  B. V. Van Beers,et al.  Liver fibrosis: non‐invasive assessment with MR elastography , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[22]  A. Manduca,et al.  Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. , 2007, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[23]  Z. Goodman Neoplasms of the liver , 2007, Modern Pathology.

[24]  L. Xu,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography of brain tumors: preliminary results , 2007, Acta radiologica.

[25]  Tatsuya Higashi,et al.  Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography--initial experience. , 2007, Radiology.

[26]  P. Tracqui,et al.  Biophysical models of tumour growth , 2009 .

[27]  R. Ehman,et al.  Abdominal Magnetic Resonance Elastography , 2009, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[28]  P. Bayly,et al.  Anisotropic mechanical properties of magnetically aligned fibrin gels measured by magnetic resonance elastography. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  P. Sijens Parametric exploration of the liver by magnetic resonance methods , 2009, European Radiology.

[30]  A. Manduca,et al.  High‐frequency mode conversion technique for stiff lesion detection with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  R. Behringer,et al.  Using MR elastography to image the 3D force chain structure of a quasi-static granular assembly , 2009 .