Tailored Duration of Contrast Material Injection in High-Pitch Computed Tomographic Aortography With a Double-Level Test Bolus Method

Objectives To achieve the efficient usage of contrast material (CM) in high-pitch CT aortography, an appropriate duration of the CM injection is crucial. We used a modification of the double-level test bolus method for determination of proper injection duration with the aim of evaluating the image quality of tailored-duration CM injection compared with that of a fixed duration. Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved retrospective review of 80 consecutive subjects who had undergone high-pitch 70-kVp CT aortography with a modified double-level test bolus method. The interval between peak enhancement at the aortic root and femoral artery was derived from the time/attenuation curves. A total of 40 subjects underwent CT aortography with individually set duration time from the results. The remaining subjects underwent CT aortography with a fixed-duration time. The density values at several parts of the aorta were assessed. The differences in image quality and CM amount used for each method were assessed by Welch test. Results The injection duration was almost 50% shorter (median, 15 seconds; range, 11–25 seconds) when individually tailored. The mean CM amount was reduced by 50% (46.2–23.9 mL, P < 0.01). The range of mean CT attenuation throughout the aorta was not significantly different between the 2 methods (316–327 HU and 305–321 HU, P > 0.05, respectively). Conclusions The modified double-level test bolus method in high-pitch CT aortography can significantly reduce the amount of CM without adversely affecting image quality.

[1]  L. Faggioni,et al.  Iodine Concentration and Optimization in Computed Tomography Angiography: Current Issues , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[2]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  CT Angiography of the Aorta: Prospective Evaluation of Individualized Low-Volume Contrast Media Protocols. , 2016, Radiology.

[3]  A. Kono,et al.  Distributed under Creative Commons Cc-by 4.0 Four-dimensional Noise Reduction Using the Time Series of Medical Computed Tomography Datasets with Short Interval Times: a Static-phantom Study , 2022 .

[4]  Vincenzo Russo,et al.  128-slice CT angiography of the aorta without ECG-gating: efficacy of faster gantry rotation time and iterative reconstruction in terms of image quality and radiation dose , 2016, European Radiology.

[5]  Long Jiang Zhang,et al.  Seventy-Peak Kilovoltage High-Pitch Thoracic Aortic CT Angiography without ECG Gating: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[6]  M. Uder,et al.  Automated Tube Voltage Selection in Thoracoabdominal Computed Tomography at High Pitch Using a Third-Generation Dual-Source Scanner: Image Quality and Radiation Dose Performance , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[7]  J. Ellis,et al.  Contrast media controversies in 2015: imaging patients with renal impairment or risk of contrast reaction. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  M. Uder,et al.  Optimizing Contrast Media Injection Protocols in State-of-the Art Computed Tomographic Angiography , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[9]  F. Meijboom,et al.  Wytyczne ESC dotyczące rozpoznawania i leczenia chorób aorty w 2014 roku , 2014 .

[10]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary angiography with third-generation dual-source CT at 70 kVp tube voltage: feasibility, image quality, radiation dose, and effect of iterative reconstruction. , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[11]  Sandy Napel,et al.  CT angiography after 20 years: a transformation in cardiovascular disease characterization continues to advance. , 2014, Radiology.

[12]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Closing in on the K edge: coronary CT angiography at 100, 80, and 70 kV-initial comparison of a second- versus a third-generation dual-source CT system. , 2014, Radiology.

[13]  T. Flohr,et al.  Low contrast volume run-off CT angiography with optimized scan time based on double-level test bolus technique--feasibility study. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[14]  P. Persson,et al.  Contrast Media Viscosity versus Osmolality in Kidney Injury: Lessons from Animal Studies , 2014, BioMed research international.

[15]  R. Günther,et al.  Identification of the iodine concentration that yields the highest intravascular enhancement in MDCT angiography. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  G. Jost,et al.  The Effect of Iodinated Contrast Agent Properties on Renal Kinetics and Oxygenation , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[17]  S. Halliburton,et al.  Image quality, contrast enhancement, and radiation dose of ECG-triggered high-pitch CT versus non-ECG-triggered standard-pitch CT of the thoracoabdominal aorta. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  S. Achenbach,et al.  SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[19]  S. Rose,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: written by the Standards of Practice Committee for the Society of Interventional Radiology and endorsed by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and the Canadian Interventional Radiology As , 2010, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[20]  K. Bae,et al.  Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. , 2010, Radiology.

[21]  Pamela K Woodard,et al.  Contrast enhancement in cardiovascular MDCT: effect of body weight, height, body surface area, body mass index, and obesity. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  Takeshi Nakaura,et al.  Lower tube voltage reduces contrast material and radiation doses on 16-MDCT aortography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  P. Parfrey,et al.  Preventing Nephropathy Induced by Contrast Medium , 2006 .

[24]  Geoffrey D Rubin,et al.  Quantification of intravenously administered contrast medium transit through the peripheral arteries: implications for CT angiography. , 2005, Radiology.