论文信息 - Comments on Hudesman and Page's Reply to Fudin's Comments on Hudesman, Page and Rautianen's Subliminal Psychodynamic Activation Experiment

Comments on Hudesman and Page's Reply to Fudin's Comments on Hudesman, Page and Rautianen's Subliminal Psychodynamic Activation Experiment

Hudesman and Page's contention that Gustafson and Källmén's 1991 results indicate that subsequent subliminal psychodynamic activation experiments do not require the controls suggested by Fudin in 1986 is questioned. The rationale for Fudin's 1993 comment concerning the limited generalizability of Hudesman, et al.'s (1992) results, a comment Hudesman and Page contended is unfounded, is discussed.

R. Fudin

[1] John Hudesman,et al. Reply to Fudin's Comments on Hudesman, Page, and Rautianen's Experiment on the Use of Subliminal Psychodynamic Activation to Enhance Mathematics Learning , 1993, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2] John Hudesman,et al. Use of Subliminal Stimulation to Enhance Learning Mathematics , 1992, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3] R. Gustafson,et al. Subliminal Psychodynamic Activation: An Experiment Controlling for Major Possible Confounding Influences Outlined by Fudin , 1991, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4] R. Fudin. Subliminal Psychodynamic Activation: Mommy and I are Not Yet One , 1986 .

[5] Harold Cook,et al. Effects of subliminal sympbiotic gratification and the magic of believing on achievement. , 1985 .

[6] Lauretta Bender,et al. Search for Oneness , 1984 .

[7] Steven R. Brown,et al. The Search for Oneness , 1982 .

[8] Kenneth A. Parker,et al. Effects of Subliminal Symbiotic Stimulation on Academic Performance: Further Evidence on the Adaptation-Enhancing Effects of Oneness Fantasies. , 1982 .