论文信息 - Making information systems research more relevant: academic and industry perspectives (panel session)

Making information systems research more relevant: academic and industry perspectives (panel session)

1. Much IS research is not valued by practitioners. Senn (1998, p. 23) quotes an IS executive who described IS research as “not relevant, readable, or reachable.” Robey and Markus (1998, p. 8) indicate that, “From a practitioner’s perspective, academic writings are literally unreadable.” Benbasat and Zmud (1999) report that non-academic subscriptions to MIS Quarterly declined by more than 60% after the subscription was unbundled from membership in the Society of Information Management.

[1] Haim Mendelson,et al. Clockspeed and Informational Response: Evidence from the Information Technology Industry , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2] Rajiv Sabherwal,et al. An analysis of research in information systems from the IS executive's perspective , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[3] Izak Benbasat,et al. Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[4] M. Lynne Markus,et al. Beyond Rigor and Relevance: Producing Consumable Research about Information Systems , 1998 .

[5] Kalle Lyytinen,et al. Empirical research in information systems: on the relevance of practice in thinking of IS research , 1999 .

[6] J. Senn,et al. The challenge of relating IS research to practice , 1998 .