Habit learning supported by efficiently controlled network dynamics in naive macaque monkeys

Primates display a marked ability to learn habits in uncertain and dynamic environments. The associated perceptions and actions of such habits engage distributed neural circuits. Yet, precisely how such circuits support the computations necessary for habit learning remain far from understood. Here we construct a formal theory of network energetics to account for how changes in brain state produce changes in sequential behavior. We exercise the theory in the context of multi-unit recordings spanning the caudate nucleus, prefrontal cortex, and frontal eyefields of female macaque monkeys engaged in 60-180 sessions of a free scan task that induces motor habits. The theory relies on the determination of effective connectivity between recording channels, and on the stipulation that a brain state is taken to be the trial-specific firing rate across those channels. The theory then predicts how much energy will be required to transition from one state into another, given the constraint that activity can spread solely through effective connections. Consistent with the theory's predictions, we observed smaller energy requirements for transitions between more similar and more complex trial saccade patterns, and for sessions characterized by less entropic selection of saccade patterns. Using a virtual lesioning approach, we demonstrate the resilience of the observed relationships between minimum control energy and behavior to significant disruptions in the inferred effective connectivity. Our theoretically principled approach to the study of habit learning paves the way for future efforts examining how behavior arises from changing patterns of activity in distributed neural circuitry.

[1]  Bernhard P. Lampe,et al.  Trip-based energy management for electric vehicles: An optimal control approach , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[2]  T. Moore,et al.  Exploration Disrupts Choice-Predictive Signals and Alters Dynamics in Prefrontal Cortex , 2017, Neuron.

[3]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Clustering Methods , 2005, The Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[4]  Kyle S. Smith,et al.  A Dual Operator View of Habitual Behavior Reflecting Cortical and Striatal Dynamics , 2013, Neuron.

[5]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  VAST (Volume Annotation and Segmentation Tool): Efficient Manual and Semi-Automatic Labeling of Large 3D Image Stacks , 2018, Front. Neural Circuits.

[7]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The Emergence of Social Norms and Conventions , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Jing Z. Liu,et al.  Fractal dimension in human cerebellum measured by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[9]  S. Mitchell,et al.  Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations Journals , 2013 .

[10]  M. Breakspear Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Conor Liston,et al.  Projections from neocortex mediate top-down control of memory retrieval , 2015, Nature.

[12]  S. Gershman Deconstructing the human algorithms for exploration , 2018, Cognition.

[13]  Theresa M. Desrochers,et al.  The Necessity of Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Higher-Level Sequential Behavior , 2015, Neuron.

[14]  Kristin A. Linn,et al.  The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists , 2020, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Francesco Sorrentino,et al.  Complete characterization of the stability of cluster synchronization in complex dynamical networks , 2015, Science Advances.

[16]  Daniel Durstewitz,et al.  Brain state stability during working memory is explained by network control theory, modulated by dopamine D1/D2 receptor function, and diminished in schizophrenia , 2019, bioRxiv.

[17]  Michelle L. Dion,et al.  Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields , 2018, Political Analysis.

[18]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  On the Nature of Explanations Offered by Network Science: A Perspective From and for Practicing Neuroscientists , 2019, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[19]  John W Krakauer,et al.  The multiple effects of practice: skill, habit and reduced cognitive load , 2018, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[20]  William Bialek,et al.  Collective Behavior of Place and Non-place Neurons in the Hippocampal Network , 2016, Neuron.

[21]  Alejandro Ribeiro,et al.  A Graph Signal Processing Perspective on Functional Brain Imaging , 2018, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[22]  D. Bassett,et al.  A Network Neuroscience of Human Learning: Potential to Inform Quantitative Theories of Brain and Behavior , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Ilana B. Witten,et al.  Striatal circuits for reward learning and decision-making , 2019, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  T. Sourkes On the Energy Cost of Mental Effort , 2006, Journal of the history of the neurosciences.

[25]  Sandip Roy,et al.  A Network Control Theory Approach to Modeling and Optimal Control of Zoonoses: Case Study of Brucellosis Transmission in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2011, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[26]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Global multi-layer network of human mobility , 2016, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Abigail S. Greene,et al.  Functional connectivity predicts changes in attention observed across minutes, days, and months , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Discovering the Computational Relevance of Brain Network Organization , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Andrea Brovelli,et al.  Multivoxel Pattern Analysis for fMRI Data: A Review , 2012, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[30]  Feng Li,et al.  The complete connectome of a learning and memory centre in an insect brain , 2017, Nature.

[31]  Qian Du,et al.  An improved box-counting method for image fractal dimension estimation , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[32]  Alicia Izquierdo,et al.  Combined unilateral lesions of the amygdala and orbital prefrontal cortex impair affective processing in rhesus monkeys. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Theresa M. Desrochers,et al.  Habit Learning by Naive Macaques Is Marked by Response Sharpening of Striatal Neurons Representing the Cost and Outcome of Acquired Action Sequences , 2015, Neuron.

[34]  Karl J. Friston Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[35]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Alison L. Barth,et al.  An Embedded Subnetwork of Highly Active Neurons in the Neocortex , 2010, Neuron.

[37]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Subcortical amygdala pathways enable rapid face processing , 2014, NeuroImage.

[38]  Annette Witt,et al.  Dynamic Effective Connectivity of Inter-Areal Brain Circuits , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  Guillaume Leclercq,et al.  Computations underlying the visuomotor transformation for smooth pursuit eye movements. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Sean N. Brennan,et al.  Observability and Controllability of Nonlinear Networks: The Role of Symmetry , 2013, Physical review. X.

[41]  Vincent P Ferrera,et al.  Representation of Outcome Risk and Action in the Anterior Caudate Nucleus , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Stefan Leijnen,et al.  The Neural Network Zoo , 2020 .

[43]  R. V. Gamkrelidze,et al.  Theory of Optimal Processes , 1961 .

[44]  William R. Schafer,et al.  The Worm Connectome: Back to the Future , 2018, Trends in Neurosciences.

[45]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  From correlation to causation: Estimating effective connectivity from zero-lag covariances of brain signals , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  R. V. Gamkrelidze,et al.  THE THEORY OF OPTIMAL PROCESSES. I. THE MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE , 1960 .

[47]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Controllability of complex networks , 2011, Nature.

[48]  Jason Z. Kim,et al.  Linear Dynamics and Control of Brain Networks , 2020 .

[49]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Caenorhabditis elegans and the network control framework—FAQs , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  S. Havlin,et al.  Self-similarity of complex networks , 2005, Nature.

[51]  H Preißl,et al.  Dynamics of activity and connectivity in physiological neuronal networks , 1991 .

[52]  J. Gold,et al.  On the nature and use of models in network neuroscience , 2018, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[53]  D. Bassett,et al.  Fronto-limbic dysconnectivity leads to impaired brain network controllability in young people with bipolar disorder and those at high genetic risk , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[54]  François G. Meyer,et al.  Metrics for graph comparison: A practitioner’s guide , 2019, bioRxiv.

[55]  Ernest Barany,et al.  Nonlinear controllability of singularly perturbed models of power flow networks , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[56]  James Carson,et al.  BRAIN Initiative: Cutting-Edge Tools and Resources for the Community , 2019, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  A. Pouget,et al.  Correlations and Neuronal Population Information. , 2016, Annual review of neuroscience.

[58]  Karl J. Friston Models of brain function in neuroimaging. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[59]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Functional brain network reconfiguration during learning in a dynamic environment , 2019, Nature Communications.

[60]  Gašper Tkačik,et al.  Maximum entropy models as a tool for building precise neural controls , 2017, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[61]  Caitlin Mills,et al.  Linking brain network reconfiguration and intelligence: Are we there yet? , 2019, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[62]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Towards a neuroscience of active sampling and curiosity , 2018, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[63]  G. Stanley,et al.  Rapid Sensory Adaptation Redux: A Circuit Perspective , 2016, Neuron.

[64]  Guosong Hong,et al.  Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings , 2019, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[65]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Dynamic Flexibility in Striatal-Cortical Circuits Supports Reinforcement Learning , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  Christopher D. Harvey,et al.  Recurrent Network Models of Sequence Generation and Memory , 2016, Neuron.

[67]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Neuroticism and conscientiousness respectively constrain and facilitate short‐term plasticity within the working memory neural network , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[68]  A. Barbey Network Neuroscience Theory of Human Intelligence , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[69]  Ziad M Hafed,et al.  Human-level saccade detection performance using deep neural networks. , 2019, Journal of neurophysiology.

[70]  Rahul Sarpeshkar,et al.  Can One Concurrently Record Electrical Spikes from Every Neuron in a Mammalian Brain? , 2019, Neuron.

[71]  Henry Markram,et al.  Real-Time Computing Without Stable States: A New Framework for Neural Computation Based on Perturbations , 2002, Neural Computation.

[72]  Mark D’Esposito,et al.  Brain Modularity: A Biomarker of Intervention-related Plasticity , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[73]  Siby Jose Plathottam,et al.  Transient loss minimization in induction machine drives using optimal control theory , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC).

[74]  Pierre Vandergheynst,et al.  Graph Signal Processing: Overview, Challenges, and Applications , 2017, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[75]  Giacomo Baggio,et al.  Stability Conditions for Cluster Synchronization in Networks of Heterogeneous Kuramoto Oscillators , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[76]  Peter Wills,et al.  Metrics for graph comparison: A practitioner’s guide , 2020, PloS one.

[77]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[78]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning and relearning in Boltzmann machines , 1986 .

[79]  Francesco Bullo,et al.  Controllability Metrics, Limitations and Algorithms for Complex Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[80]  S. Liberty,et al.  Linear Systems , 2010, Scientific Parallel Computing.

[81]  U. Alon,et al.  Spontaneous evolution of modularity and network motifs. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  Jordan B. Logue,et al.  Lesions of the Patch Compartment of Dorsolateral Striatum Disrupt Stimulus–Response Learning , 2019, Neuroscience.

[83]  S. Mitchell,et al.  Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations Journals 1 , 2013 .

[84]  Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini,et al.  Normal and pathological reading: converging data from lesion and imaging studies , 2003, NeuroImage.

[85]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Sex differences in network controllability as a predictor of executive function in youth , 2018, NeuroImage.

[86]  Magnus Karlsson,et al.  High-density, long-lasting, and multi-region electrophysiological recordings using polymer electrode arrays , 2018 .

[87]  J. R. Simms Quantification of behavior. , 1983, Behavioral science.

[88]  T. Komiyama,et al.  Circuit Mechanisms of Sensorimotor Learning , 2016, Neuron.

[89]  L. Squire,et al.  Contrasting Effects on Discrimination Learning after Hippocampal Lesions and Conjoint Hippocampal–Caudate Lesions in Monkeys , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[90]  Hang Yu,et al.  Light-Sheet Microscopy in Neuroscience. , 2019, Annual review of neuroscience.

[91]  Neven Caplar,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts , 2016, Nature Astronomy.

[92]  Elad Schneidman,et al.  Stimulus-dependent Maximum Entropy Models of Neural Population Codes , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[93]  Dirk Zeidler,et al.  Mission (im)possible - mapping the brain becomes a reality. , 2015, Microscopy.

[94]  Eric Shea-Brown,et al.  Linking structure and activity in nonlinear spiking networks , 2016, bioRxiv.

[95]  Brian Litt,et al.  White Matter Network Architecture Guides Direct Electrical Stimulation through Optimal State Transitions , 2018, bioRxiv.

[96]  Yee Lian Chew,et al.  Network control principles predict neuron function in the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome , 2017, Nature.

[97]  Vladimir Itskov,et al.  Flexible Memory Networks , 2010, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[98]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Optimal habits can develop spontaneously through sensitivity to local cost , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[99]  Nicole M. Long,et al.  Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Individual Differences in Uncertainty-Driven Exploration , 2012, Neuron.

[100]  Theresa M. Desrochers,et al.  A system for recording neural activity chronically and simultaneously from multiple cortical and subcortical regions in nonhuman primates. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[101]  Simona Cocco,et al.  Neural assemblies revealed by inferred connectivity-based models of prefrontal cortex recordings , 2016, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[102]  W. B. Marks,et al.  Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology — dimensions, lacunarity and multifractals , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[103]  Gordon Pipa,et al.  Transfer entropy—a model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[104]  Kai Yang,et al.  Enhancing network synchronizability by strengthening a single node. , 2019, Physical review. E.

[105]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Thermodynamics as a theory of decision-making with information-processing costs , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[106]  Barbara F. Walter,et al.  The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations , 2013, International Organization.

[107]  Ali Ghazizadeh,et al.  Dopamine Neurons Encoding Long-Term Memory of Object Value for Habitual Behavior , 2015, Cell.

[108]  Paul I. Barton,et al.  Efficient Control Discretization Based on Turnpike Theory for Dynamic Optimization , 2017 .

[109]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[110]  Moritz Helias,et al.  Fundamental Activity Constraints Lead to Specific Interpretations of the Connectome , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[111]  Andrew W. Moore,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: A Survey , 1996, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[112]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[113]  Brent Doiron,et al.  The mechanics of state-dependent neural correlations , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[114]  João Pedro Hespanha,et al.  Linear Systems Theory , 2009 .

[115]  K J Friston,et al.  The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. , 1999, Science.

[116]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A free energy principle for the brain , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.