Measuring the effectiveness of computer-based scientific visualisations for conceptual development in Australian chemistry classrooms

Visual modes of representation have always been very important in science and science education. Interactive computer-based animations and simulations offer new visual resources for chemistry education. Many studies have shown that students enjoy learning with visualisations but few have explored how learning outcomes compare when teaching with or without visualisations. This study employs a quasi-experimental crossover research design and quantitative methods to measure the educational effectiveness - defined as level of conceptual development on the part of students - of using computer-based scientific visualisations versus teaching without visualisations in teaching chemistry. In addition to finding that teaching with visualisations offered outcomes that were not significantly different from teaching without visualisations, the study also explored differences in outcomes for male and female students, students with different learning styles (visual, aural, kinesthetic) and students of differing levels of academic ability.

[1]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  What architects see in their sketches: implications for design tools , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[2]  Tony Koppi,et al.  Learning objects, repositories, sharing and reusability , 2005 .

[3]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Prospects for Scientific Visualization as an Educational Technology , 1995 .

[4]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[5]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[6]  M. Brooks,et al.  Drawing, Visualisation and Young Children’s Exploration of “Big Ideas” , 2009 .

[7]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Seeing What We Build Together: Distributed Multimedia Learning Environments for Transformative Communications , 1994 .

[8]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[9]  Michael Kompf.  Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and the Seduction of Knowledge, Teaching, and Learning: What Lies Ahead for Education , 2005 .

[10]  Paul B. Hounshell,et al.  Using three-dimensional models to teach molecular structures in high school chemistry , 1995 .

[11]  D. Treagust,et al.  In search of explanatory frameworks: an analysis of Richard Feynman's lecture 'Atoms in motion' , 2000 .

[12]  Gita Hakerem.  The Effect of Interactive, Three Dimensional, High Speed Simulations on High School Science Students' Conceptions of the Molecular Structure of Water. , 1993 .

[13]  Michael Barnett,et al.  Electromagnetism Supercharged! Learning Physics with Digital Simulation Games , 2004, ICLS.

[14]  Michael R. Abraham,et al.  The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students , 1995 .

[15]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Questioning the Questions of Instructional Technology Research. , 1995 .

[16]  C. Cordes,et al.  Fool's Gold: A Critical Look at Computers in Childhood. , 2000 .

[17]  Edward L. Smith,et al.  Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in Science , 1993 .

[18]  Yael Kali,et al.  Software for Assisting High-School Students in the Spatial Perception of Geological Structures , 1997 .

[19]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Real-Time Data Display, Spatial Visualization Ability, and Learning Force and Motion Concepts , 2006 .

[20]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .

[21]  Lauren Cifuentes,et al.  Computer graphics for student engagement in science learning , 2001 .

[22]  Paul Horwitz,et al.  Using Computer Visualization Models in High School Chemistry: The Role of Teacher Beliefs. , 2000 .

[23]  Shamin Padalkar,et al.  Visualisation and Reasoning in Explaining the Phases of the Moon , 2009 .

[24]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[25]  Marc A. Evans,et al.  Cross-Over Experiments: Design, Analysis and Application , 1992 .

[26]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[27]  W. Robinson,et al.  An Inventory for Alternate Conceptions among First-Semester General Chemistry Students , 2002 .

[28]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[29]  James J. Kaput,et al.  Representations, inscriptions, descriptions and learning: A kaleidoscope of windows , 1998 .

[30]  Ricardo Nemirovsky.  On ways of symbolizing: The case of Laura and the velocity sign , 1994 .

[31]  David W. Brooks,et al.  Cookbook Procedures in MBL Physics Exercises , 2003 .

[32]  Brant E. Hinrichs.  Using the System Schema Representational Tool to Promote Student Understanding of Newton's Third Law. , 2004 .

[33]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Representations: Students' Use of a Visualization Tool in the Classroom , 2000 .

[34]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[35]  Douglas H. Clements,et al.  Strip Mining for Gold: Research and Policy in Educational Technology—A Response to “Fool’s Gold” , 2003 .

[36]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Digital Images in the Science Classroom. In the Curriculum--Science. , 2004 .