Symposium: Theories of the Policy Process

Over the past decade and a half, a key development in policy studies has been a growing awareness of the vital part played by various discontinuities in the policy process, particularly in explaining the dynamics of major policy change. These discontinuities can take the form of the introduction of new ideas, values and knowledge, but can also represent gaps between the various phases of the policy process, and the institutional differences between separate policy arenas. One of those at the forefront of this fresh perspective is Paul Sabatier who, in his work with Hank Jenkins-Smith, has developed the key concept of the advocacy coalition framework (ACF). This book, in providing concise and authoritative accounts of both new and more established policy process frameworks, gives us an excellent overview and summary of the current state of play. A more intriguing facet of the book, however, is how, implicitly, it makes us more aware of the multidimensional character of the policy process.

[1]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[2]  D. J. Coyle,et al.  Requisites of radical reform: Income maintenance versus tax preferences , 1987 .

[3]  Richard Rose,et al.  What is Lesson-Drawing? , 1991, Journal of Public Policy.

[4]  Gary Mucciaroni The Garbage Can Model & the Study of Policy Making: A Critique , 1992, Polity.

[5]  R. Hoppe,et al.  Handling Frozen Fire: Political Culture and Risk Management , 1993 .

[6]  A. Schneider,et al.  Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[7]  Frank Fischer,et al.  The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning , 1993 .

[8]  Daniel C. McCool,et al.  Public Policy Theories, Models, and Concepts: An Anthology , 1994 .

[9]  Edella Schlager,et al.  Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework , 1995 .

[10]  A. Schneider,et al.  Social Construction (Continued) , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[11]  R. Lane Positivism, Scientific Realism and Political Science , 1996 .

[12]  James A. Caporaso The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern? , 1996 .

[13]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature , 1996 .

[14]  F. Scharpf Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism In Policy Research , 1997 .

[15]  A. Schneider,et al.  Policy Design for Democracy , 1997 .

[16]  Peter John,et al.  Analysing Public Policy , 1998 .

[17]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe , 1998 .