Emergent Runaway into an Avoidance Area in a Swarm of Soldier Crabs

Emergent behavior that arises from a mass effect is one of the most striking aspects of collective animal groups. Investigating such behavior would be important in order to understand how individuals interact with their neighbors. Although there are many experiments that have used collective animals to investigate social learning or conflict between individuals and society such as that between a fish and a school, reports on mass effects are rare. In this study, we show that a swarm of soldier crabs could spontaneously enter a water pool, which are usually avoided, by forming densely populated part of a swarm at the edge of the water pool. Moreover, we show that the observed behavior can be explained by the model of collective behavior based on inherent noise that is individuals’ different velocities in a directed group. Our results suggest that inherent noise, which is widely seen in collective animals, can contribute to formation and/or maintenance of a swarm and that the dense swarm can enter the pool by means of enhanced inherent noise.

[1]  A. Cavagna,et al.  Diffusion of individual birds in starling flocks , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Andrew T. Hartnett,et al.  Both information and social cohesion determine collective decisions in animal groups , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Jin-Taur Shih.  Population Densities and Annual Activities of Mictyris brevidactylus (Stimpson, 1858) in the Tanshui Mangrove Swamp of Northern Taiwan , 1995 .

[4]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[6]  Benny K. K. Chan,et al.  A New Species Of Mictyris (Decapoda, Brachyura, Mictyridae) From The Ryukyu Islands, Japan , 2010 .

[7]  Daniel W Franks,et al.  Limited interactions in flocks: relating model simulations to empirical data , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[8]  G. Parisi,et al.  Scale-free correlations in starling flocks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  G. Parisi,et al.  Empirical investigation of starling flocks: a benchmark study in collective animal behaviour , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Yukio-Pegio Gunji,et al.  Fluctuation-Driven Flocking Movement in Three Dimensions and Scale-Free Correlation , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  Andrew Adamatzky,et al.  Passively Active – Actively Passive Mutual Anticipation in a Communicative Swarm , 2012 .

[12]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  The Dynamics of Coordinated Group Hunting and Collective Information Transfer among Schooling Prey , 2012, Current Biology.

[13]  P. Laming,et al.  Avoidance learning in goldfish (Carassius auratus) and trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and implications for Pain perception , 2006 .

[14]  I. Couzin,et al.  Emergent Sensing of Complex Environments by Mobile Animal Groups , 2013, Science.

[15]  Christian A. Yates,et al.  Inherent noise can facilitate coherence in collective swarm motion , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Artificial Fish Schools: Collective Effects of School Size, Body Size, and Body Form , 2003, Artificial Life.

[17]  Satoshi Takeda,et al.  Sexual differences in behaviour during the breeding season in the soldier crab (Mictyris brevidactylus) , 2005 .

[18]  Pawel Romanczuk,et al.  Collective motion due to individual escape and pursuit response. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[19]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Collective States, Multistability and Transitional Behavior in Schooling Fish , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Tomohiro Shirakawa,et al.  An associative learning experiment using the plasmodium of Physarum polycephalum , 2011, Nano Commun. Networks.

[21]  Colin R. Twomey,et al.  Visual sensory networks and effective information transfer in animal groups , 2013, Current Biology.

[22]  Yukio-Pegio Gunji,et al.  A Model of Scale-Free Proportion Based on Mutual Anticipation , 2012, Int. J. Artif. Life Res..

[23]  Minoru Murai,et al.  MICROHABITAT USE BY THE SOLDIER CRAB MICTYRIS BREVIDACTYLUS (BRACHYURA: MICTYRIDAE): INTERCHANGEABILITY OF SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE FEEDING THROUGH BURROW STRUCTURE ALTERATION , 2004 .

[24]  Andrew Adamatzky,et al.  Robust Soldier Crab Ball Gate , 2011, Complex Syst..

[25]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  Collective Motion and Cannibalism in Locust Migratory Bands , 2008, Current Biology.

[26]  K. Laland,et al.  Learning by proportional observation in a species of fish , 2010 .

[27]  Craig W. Reynolds.  Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[28]  Kevin N. Laland,et al.  Conformist learning in nine-spined sticklebacks' foraging decisions , 2010, Biology Letters.

[29]  Kojiro Iizuka,et al.  Embodied swarming based on back propagation through time shows water-crossing, hourglass and logic-gate behaviors , 2011, ECAL.

[30]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Emergence of Oblong School Shape: Models and Empirical Data of Fish , 2010 .

[32]  Clare Bradshaw,et al.  Factors limiting distribution and activity patterns of the soldier crab Dotilla myctiroides in Phuket, South Thailand , 1999 .