Pole placement in uncertain dynamic systems by variance minimisation

Abstract The problem of pole placement in dynamic systems with uncertainties is addressed using a global optimisation approach. Variability between nominally identical systems, which arises from manufacturing tolerances, wear and environmental variability, is considered. In the proposed method, receptances are measured from one of the open-loop, nominal systems chosen at random. In this case, in addition to the variability about the parameter means, the parameter means are also random. The receptance method is then used to place the poles of the measured system such that their spread, due to parameter uncertainty, is minimised. The measure used to assess the spread is the variance, determined efficiently by a polynomial chaos expansion. Among the advantages of the method are: (i) there is no requirement to model the system since experimental receptances are used, (ii) it is not necessary to measure the mean system, and (iii) uncertainty in poles is quantified across its full range by using variances. Numerical and experimental examples are provided to illustrate the working of the proposed method.

[1]  Biswa Nath Datta,et al.  Robust partial quadratic eigenvalue assignment with time delay using the receptance and the system matrices , 2016 .

[2]  Biswa Nath Datta,et al.  Robust and minimum norm partial quadratic eigenvalue assignment in vibrating systems: A new optimization approach , 2010 .

[3]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Partial pole placement in structures by the method of receptances: theory and experiments , 2010 .

[4]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[5]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Robust pole placement in structures by the method of receptances , 2011 .

[6]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Inverse eigenvalue problems in vibration absorption: Passive modification and active control , 2006 .

[7]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  An Overview of the Receptance Method in Active Vibration Control , 2012 .

[8]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Receptance Method in Active Vibration Control , 2006 .

[9]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Multiple-input active vibration control by partial pole placement using the method of receptances , 2013 .

[10]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Design and wind tunnel test of a MODular aeroelastic FLEXible wing (MODFLEX) , 2016 .

[11]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Reliability-based Structural Design , 2006 .

[12]  Biswa Nath Datta,et al.  Minimum norm partial quadratic eigenvalue assignment with time delay in vibrating structures using the receptance and the system matrices , 2013 .

[13]  S. Audebert,et al.  Uncertainties in structural dynamics: overview and comparative analysis of methods , 2015 .

[14]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[15]  Raymond M. Kolonay,et al.  Receptance-Based Active Aeroelastic Control with Embedded Control Surfaces Having Actuator Dynamics , 2016 .

[16]  Huajiang Ouyang,et al.  Active assignment of eigenvalues and eigen-sensitivities for robust stabilization of friction-induced vibration , 2017 .

[17]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Feedback linearisation of nonlinear vibration problems: A new formulation by the method of receptances , 2018 .

[18]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Alaa Chateauneuf Principles of reliability-based design optimization , 2008 .

[20]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Receptance-Based Active Aeroelastic Control Using Multiple Control Surfaces , 2014 .

[21]  Stephen J. Elliott,et al.  Receptance method for active vibration control of a nonlinear system , 2013 .