S-frame discrepancy correction models for data-informed Reynolds stress closure

Despite their well-known limitations, RANS models remain the most commonly employed tool for modeling turbulent flows in engineering practice. RANS models are predicated on the solution of the RANS equations, but these equations involve an unclosed term, the Reynolds stress tensor, which must be modeled. The Reynolds stress tensor is often modeled as an algebraic function of mean flow field variables and turbulence variables. This introduces a discrepancy between the Reynolds stress tensor predicted by the model and the exact Reynolds stress tensor. This discrepancy can result in inaccurate mean flow field predictions. In this paper, we introduce a data-informed approach for arriving at Reynolds stress models with improved predictive performance. Our approach relies on learning the components of the Reynolds stress discrepancy tensor associated with a given Reynolds stress model in the mean strain-rate tensor eigenframe. These components are typically smooth and hence simple to learn using state-of-the-art machine learning strategies and regression techniques. Our approach automatically yields Reynolds stress models that are symmetric, and it yields Reynolds stress models that are both Galilean and frame invariant provided the inputs are themselves Galilean and frame invariant. To arrive at computable models of the discrepancy tensor, we employ feed-forward neural networks and an input space spanning the integrity basis of the mean strain-rate tensor, the mean rotation-rate tensor, the mean pressure gradient, and the turbulent kinetic energy gradient, and we introduce a framework for dimensional reduction of the input space to further reduce computational cost. Numerical results illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach for data-informed Reynolds stress closure for a suite of turbulent flow problems of increasing complexity.

[1]  Heng Xiao,et al.  Quantifying and reducing model-form uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations: A data-driven, physics-informed Bayesian approach , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[2]  Jinlong Wu,et al.  Physics-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing Reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on DNS data , 2016, 1606.07987.

[3]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  Edinburgh Research Explorer Deep learning: an introduction for applied mathematicians , 2022 .

[4]  Brendan D. Tracey,et al.  A Machine Learning Strategy to Assist Turbulence Model Development , 2015 .

[5]  Julia Ling,et al.  Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: A comprehensive framework , 2017, Physical Review Fluids.

[6]  M. Lesieur,et al.  New Trends in Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulence , 1996 .

[7]  D. Wilcox Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models , 1988 .

[8]  Heng Xiao,et al.  Flows over periodic hills of parameterized geometries: A dataset for data-driven turbulence modeling from direct simulations , 2019, Computers & Fluids.

[9]  K. Carlson,et al.  Turbulent Flows , 2020, Finite Analytic Method in Flows and Heat Transfer.

[10]  J. Templeton,et al.  Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance , 2016, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[12]  Paola Cinnella,et al.  Quantification of model uncertainty in RANS simulations: A review , 2018, Progress in Aerospace Sciences.

[13]  Rajeev K. Jaiman,et al.  Industrial application of RANS modelling: capabilities and needs , 2009 .

[14]  A. Oliva,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of backward-facing step flow at $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}=395$ and expansion ratio 2 , 2019, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  P. Spalart,et al.  Numerical study of turbulent separation bubbles with varying pressure gradient and Reynolds number , 2018, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[17]  U. Piomelli,et al.  Large-eddy simulations of high Reynolds-number flow over a contoured ramp , 2006 .

[18]  Andrew McCulloch,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: a Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2005 .

[19]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  Turbulence Model Development using CFD-Driven Machine Learning , 2019 .

[20]  Kenneth E. Jansen,et al.  A stabilized finite element method for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations using a hierarchical basis , 2001 .

[21]  R. Moser,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to $\mathit{Re}_{{\it\tau}}\approx 5200$ , 2014, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[22]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[23]  M. Jansen Analysis of variance designs for model output , 1999 .

[24]  Linyang Zhu,et al.  Machine learning methods for turbulence modeling in subsonic flows around airfoils , 2018, Physics of Fluids.

[25]  Jean-Philippe Laval,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of a separated channel flow with a smooth profile , 2007, 0710.3729.

[26]  John L. Lumley,et al.  Computational Modeling of Turbulent Flows , 1978 .

[27]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[29]  J. Fröhlich,et al.  Hybrid LES/RANS methods for the simulation of turbulent flows , 2008 .

[30]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[31]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Mathematical Models. Numerical ExperienceSensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Mathematical Models. Numerical Experience , 1995 .

[32]  C. G. Speziale On nonlinear K-l and K-ε models of turbulence , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  D. Hilbert,et al.  Theory of algebraic invariants , 1993 .

[34]  Karthik Duraisamy,et al.  A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[35]  P. Moin,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION: A Tool in Turbulence Research , 1998 .

[36]  T. Kármán Mechanical similitude and turbulence , 1931 .

[37]  Richard Sandberg,et al.  A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress-strain relationship , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[38]  P. Spalart,et al.  DNS and modeling of a turbulent boundary layer with separation and reattachment over a range of Reynolds numbers , 2012 .

[39]  Jinlong Wu,et al.  Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations with explicit data-driven Reynolds stress closure can be ill-conditioned , 2019, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[40]  P. Spalart Detached-Eddy Simulation , 2009 .

[41]  Kurt M. Anstreicher,et al.  Institute for Mathematical Physics Semidefinite Programming versus the Reformulation–linearization Technique for Nonconvex Quadratically Constrained Quadratic Programming Semidefinite Programming versus the Reformulation-linearization Technique for Nonconvex Quadratically Constrained , 2022 .

[42]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  Philosophies and fallacies in turbulence modeling , 2015 .

[43]  Elie Bienenstock,et al.  Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma , 1992, Neural Computation.

[44]  J. Templeton Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for prediction of regions of high Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes uncertainty , 2015 .

[45]  T. Gatski,et al.  On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[46]  K. Jansen,et al.  Wall-Modeled LES of Flow over a Gaussian Bump with Strong Pressure Gradients and Separation , 2020, AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM.

[47]  Brendan D. Tracey,et al.  Application of supervised learning to quantify uncertainties in turbulence and combustion modeling , 2013 .

[48]  Paola Cinnella,et al.  Discovery of Algebraic Reynolds-Stress Models Using Sparse Symbolic Regression , 2019 .

[49]  Heng Xiao,et al.  Representation of stress tensor perturbations with application in machine-learning-assisted turbulence modeling , 2019, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[50]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[51]  Richard P. Dwight,et al.  Data-driven modelling of the Reynolds stress tensor using random forests with invariance , 2018, Computers & Fluids.

[52]  B. Launder,et al.  Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[53]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2018, Fundamental Statistical Inference.

[54]  S. Murman,et al.  On the accuracy of RANS simulations with DNS data. , 2016, Physics of fluids.

[55]  S. Pope A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[56]  K. Chien,et al.  Predictions of Channel and Boundary-Layer Flows with a Low-Reynolds-Number Turbulence Model , 1982 .

[57]  Paola Cinnella,et al.  Data-Free and Data-Driven RANS Predictions with Quantified Uncertainty , 2018 .