Modal Aspects of Object Types and Part-Whole Relations and the de re/de dicto Distinction

In a series of publications, we have proposed a foundational system of ontological categories which has been used to evaluate and improve the quality of conceptual modeling languages and models. In this article, we continue this work by employing theories from Formal Ontology, Cognitive Psychology and Philosophical Logic to systematically investigate some important modal aspects of the ontological categories represented in structural conceptual models. In particular, we focus on Object Types and Part-Whole Relations, formally characterizing some modal properties that motivate the proposal of a number of distinctions within these categories. In addition, we show how two types of modality known in philosophical logic (de re/de dicto modality) can be used to address some subtle issues that appear in conceptual diagrams when different sorts of object types and part-whole relations are combined.

[1]  Arnold Neumaier,et al.  Global Optimization and Constraint Satisfaction, Second International Workshop, COCOS 2003, Lausanne, Switzerland, November 18-21, 2003, Revised Selected Papers , 2005, COCOS.

[2]  Richard L. Mendelsohn,et al.  First-Order Modal Logic , 1998 .

[3]  Jay L. Garfield,et al.  Review: John Macnamara, A Border Dispute. The Place of Logic in Psychology , 1988 .

[4]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  An Overview of OntoClean , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[5]  Giancarlo Guizzardi,et al.  Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models , 2005 .

[6]  C. Maria Keet Part-Whole Relations in Object-Role Models , 2006, OTM Workshops.

[7]  Douglas Herrmann,et al.  A Taxonomy of Part-Whole Relations , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Joerg Evermann,et al.  The Association Construct in Conceptual Modelling - An Analysis Using the Bunge Ontological Model , 2005, CAiSE.

[9]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Business Systems Analysis With Ontologies , 2005 .

[10]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  What is this thing called aggregation? , 1999, Proceedings Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems. TOOLS 29 (Cat. No.PR00275).

[11]  Boris Wyssusek,et al.  Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modelling Reconsidered: A Response , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Ontological analysis of whole-part relationships in OO-models , 2001, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[13]  Gerd Wagner,et al.  Towards Ontological Foundations for UML Conceptual Models , 2002, OTM.

[14]  Steffen Staab,et al.  International Handbooks on Information Systems , 2013 .

[15]  Boris Wyssusek,et al.  On Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modelling , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Gerd Wagner,et al.  An Ontologically Well-Founded Profile for UML Conceptual Models , 2004, CAiSE.

[17]  James J. Odell,et al.  Advanced object-oriented analysis and design using UML , 1997 .

[18]  Kalle Lyytinen "Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modelling" by Boris Wyssusek - a Critical Response , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..