Decision-making and action selection in two minds: An analysis based on model human processor with realtime constraints (MHP/RT)

Abstract Decision-making and action selection are mental activities for shaping and organizing human behavior in the ever-changing environment. There are, however, important differences between decision-making and action selection. According to “Two Minds” ( Evans and Frankish, 2009 , Kahneman, 2003 , Kahneman, 2011 ) – a version of dual processing theory – human behavior can be viewed as the integration of output of System 1, i.e., unconscious automatic processes, and System 2, i.e., conscious deliberate processes. System 1 activates a sequence of automatic actions. System 2 monitors System 1’s performance according to the plan it has created and, at the same time, it activates future possible courses of actions. Decision-making narrowly refers to System 2’s slow functions for planning for the future and related deliberate activities, e.g., monitoring, for future planning. On the other hand, action selection refers to integrated activities including not only System 1’s fast activities but also System 2’s slow activities, not separately but integrally. This paper further discusses the difference between decision-making and action selection on the basis of the architecture model the authors have developed for simulating human beings’ in situ action selection, Model Human Processor with Realtime Constraints (MHP/RT) ( Kitajima & Toyota, 2012b ). MHP/RT’s simulation of human behavior along the time dimension shows when the processes of decision-making and action selection would be initiated and how they are carried out.

[1]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[2]  Hirotsugu Tahira,et al.  Understanding Tourists' In Situ Behavior: A Cognitive Chrono-Ethnography Study of Visitors to a Hot Spring Resort , 2012 .

[3]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[4]  Makoto Toyota,et al.  MSA: Maximum Satisfaction Architecture: A Basis for Designing Intelligent Autonomous Agents on WEB 2.0 , 2007 .

[5]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[6]  Muneo Kitajima Cognitive Chrono-Ethnography (CCE): a methodology for anticipating future user needs. , 2012, Work.

[7]  Muneo Kitajima,et al.  Four Processing Modes of in situ Human Behavior , 2011, BICA.

[8]  K. Jellinger,et al.  In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. , 2009 .

[9]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[10]  K. McRae,et al.  Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. , 2008 .

[11]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Society of Mind: A Response to Four Reviews , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[12]  John R. Anderson How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe , 2007 .

[13]  G. Lakoff Cognitive models and prototype theory. , 1987 .

[14]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[15]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2005 .

[16]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[17]  Muneo Kitajima,et al.  Decision-Making and Action Selection in Two Minds , 2012, BICA.

[18]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[19]  Muneo Kitajima,et al.  Simulating navigation behaviour based on the architecture model Model Human Processor with Real-Time Constraints (MHP/RT) , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[20]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[21]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Society of Mind Project , 1988 .

[22]  Muneo Kitajima,et al.  CCE: Cognitive Chrono-Ethnography , 2010 .

[23]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .