Nest architecture, activity pattern, worker density and the dynamics of disease transmission in social insects.

The role of disease in the organization of insect colonies has become an important focus of research in evolutionary pathobiology, in which the relationship of sociality and disease transmission can be comparatively and experimentally analysed. In this paper we use an individual-based model of disease transmission to assess how an epidemic is influenced by worker density and activity level, the probability of disease transmission, and the structural organization of the nest. First, we observed in our model a nonlinear interaction between worker density and the probability of disease transmission: high levels of both factors interact to enhance the likelihood of an epidemic. Additionally, when we incorporated in our model the empirical observation that only a fraction of the worker population in social insect colonies is active at any given point in time, results suggested that relatively low levels of worker movement can have a significant impact on the spread of disease, slowing its transmission through the colony. Finally, we found that nests having even a simple spatial separation of chambers could delay the spread of infection and diminish the severity of an outbreak. The effect of nest structure in delaying infection spread became more pronounced as nest architecture became increasingly unidimensional, as in the case of simple gallery nests. Therefore, nest architecture and worker activity patterns might indeed exert considerable influence on the dynamics of epidemics in social insects and should be incorporated into models of disease transmission.

[1]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Signaling mechanisms in the antimicrobial host defense of Drosophila. , 2000, Current opinion in microbiology.

[2]  J. Traniello,et al.  The social transmission of disease between adult male and female reproductives of the dampwood termite Zootermopsis angusticollis , 2000 .

[3]  B. Cole,et al.  Mobile Cellular Automata Models of Ant Behavior: Movement Activity of Leptothorax allardycei , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[4]  J. Traniello,et al.  Disease susceptibility and the adaptive nature of colony demography in the dampwood termite Zootermopsis angusticollis , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  Andrew I Barnes,et al.  Density–dependent prophylaxis in the mealworm beetle Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): cuticular melanization is an indicator of investment in immunity , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  D. Feener Effects of parasites on foraging and defense behavior of a termitophagous ant, Pheidole titanis Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  P. Schmid-Hempel Parasites in Social Insects , 1998 .

[8]  J. Traniello,et al.  Immunity in a Social Insect , 1999, Naturwissenschaften.

[9]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Task partitioning, division of labour and nest compartmentalisation collectively isolate hazardous waste in the leafcutting ant Atta cephalotes , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  P. Schmid-Hempel,et al.  Endoparasitic flies, pollen-collection by bumblebees and a potential host-parasite conflict , 1991, Oecologia.

[11]  Y. Engström Induction and regulation of antimicrobial peptides in Drosophila. , 1999, Developmental and comparative immunology.

[12]  W. Wcislo,et al.  Nesting biology of tropical solitary and social sweat bees,Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi Wcislo andL. (D.) aeneiventre (Friese) (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) , 1993, Insectes Sociaux.

[13]  R. Jeanne,et al.  The Adaptiveness of Social Wasp Nest Architecture , 1975, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[14]  Flavio Roces,et al.  Wind-induced ventilation of the giant nests of the leaf-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri , 2001, Naturwissenschaften.

[15]  L. Gilbert,et al.  Sex ratio variation as a function of host size in Pseudacteon flies (Diptera: Phoridae), parasitoids of Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1999 .

[16]  K. Wilson,et al.  Density‐dependent prophylaxis: evidence from Lepidoptera–baculovirus interactions? , 1998 .

[17]  J. Traniello,et al.  Pathogen Alarm Behavior in a Termite: A New Form of Communication in Social Insects , 1999, Naturwissenschaften.

[18]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  F. M. Weesner,et al.  Biology of Termites , 1969, Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde und Pflanzenschutz.

[20]  E. Wilson,et al.  Caste and ecology in the social insects. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[21]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Modelling collective foraging by means of individual behaviour rules in honey-bees , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  A. Maxmen,et al.  Disease resistance: a benefit of sociality in the dampwood termite Zootermopsis angusticollis (Isoptera: Termopsidae) , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  L. Maistrello,et al.  Behavioural differences between male and female replacement reproductives in Kalotermes flavicollis (Isoptera, Kalotermitidae) , 1999, Insectes Sociaux.

[24]  P. Schmid-Hempel,et al.  On the evolutionary ecology of specific immune defence , 2003 .

[25]  P. Schmid-Hempel Variation in immune defence as a question of evolutionary ecology , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  S. Kolmes,et al.  Ergonomics in stingless bees: changes in intranidal behavior after partial removal of storage pots and honey inMelipona favosa (Hym. Apidae, Meliponinae) , 1992, Insectes Sociaux.

[27]  Jacobus C. Biesmeijer,et al.  Self-organization in collective honeybee foraging: emergence of symmetry breaking, cross inhibition and equal harvest-rate distribution , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  L. Gilbert,et al.  Foraging ecology and patterns of diversification in dipteran parasitoids of fire ants in south Brazil , 1997 .

[29]  J. Traniello,et al.  The development of immunity in a social insect: Evidence for the group facilitation of disease resistance , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  S. Simpson,et al.  Coping with crowds: Density-dependent disease resistance in desert locusts , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  P. Schmid-Hempel,et al.  Transmission of a pathogen in Bombus terrestris, with a note on division of labour in social insects , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  J. Korb Thermoregulation and ventilation of termite mounds , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[33]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Collective behavior of random-activated mobile cellular automata , 1993 .

[34]  U. Gerson,et al.  Parasitic mites of honey bees: life history, implications, and impact. , 2000, Annual review of entomology.

[35]  P. Schmid-Hempel,et al.  Parasites and flower choice of bumblebees , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  L. Keller Parasites, Worker Polymorphism, and Queen Number in Social Insects , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[37]  Hans Schwarz,et al.  Besprechung von: Lorenz, Konrad. Civilized Man's Eight Deadly Sins. Translated by M. Kerr Wilson. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974 , 1977 .

[38]  W. Tschinkel,et al.  Nest complexity, group size and brood rearing in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta , 2002, Insectes Sociaux.

[39]  Scott Camazine,et al.  The role of colony organization on pathogen transmission in social insects. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.