Tracking in Secondary Schools: A Contextual Perspective.

Tracking is nearly ubiquitous in secondary schools despite evidence suggesting its general ineffectiveness and likely negative effects on students in low tracks. Here it is argued that consideration of two contexts in which tracking is embedded is required for understanding how tracking works and why it persists. The schooling context (tracking's consequences for school and classroom practice) permits understanding of how tracking's educational effects may occur. The societal context (the beliefs, values, and circumstances that originally influenced the institution of tracking and may continue to shape current practice) provides an understanding of why tracking, and not some other approach, was adopted as the means for managing student diversity. It also provides insight into how race and class were historically confounded with tracking and may continue to influence practice. Analyses of these contexts suggest that tracking profoundly influences the day-to-day conduct of schools and reflects assumptions a...

[1]  Ivar E. Berg,et al.  Education and Jobs: The Great Training Robbery , 1971 .

[2]  J. Oakes,et al.  Critical Inquiry for School Renewal: Liberating Theory and Practice , 1986 .

[3]  Linda M. Mcneil.  Negotiating Classroom Knowledge: Beyond Achievement and Socialization , 1981 .

[4]  M. H. Metz.  Classrooms and Corridors: The Crisis of Authority in Desegregated Secondary Schools , 1978 .

[5]  J. Oakes,et al.  Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. , 1986 .

[6]  H. Birx,et al.  The Mismeasure of Man , 1981 .

[7]  Merrilee K. Finley.  Teachers and Tracking in a Comprehensive High School. , 1984 .

[8]  S. Berryman.  Vocational Education and the Work Establishment of Youth , 1981 .

[9]  Nathan W. Ackerman,et al.  THE ADOLESCENT SOCIETY , 1964 .

[10]  Arthur G. Powell,et al.  The Shopping Mall High School: Winners and Losers in the Educational Marketplace. , 1985 .

[11]  Robert B. Everhart.  Reading, writing, and resistance : adolescence and labor in a junior high school , 1983 .

[12]  J. Coleman.  The Adolescent Society , 1961 .

[13]  D. Lawton.  Social Relations in a Secondary School , 1967, Mental Health.

[14]  Caroline Hodges Persell,et al.  Education and Inequality: The Roots and Results of Stratification in American Schools , 1979 .

[15]  D. Hargreaves.  Social Relations in a Secondary School , 1968 .

[16]  Dominick Esposito,et al.  Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Ability Grouping: Principal Findings and Implications for Evaluating and Designing More Effective Educational Environments1 , 1973 .

[17]  F. Erickson.  Gatekeeping and the Melting Pot: Interaction in Counseling Encounters , 1975 .

[18]  Ernest R. House,et al.  Technology versus Craft: a Ten Year Perspective on Innovation , 1979 .

[19]  James E. Rosenbaum.  Social implications of educational grouping , 1980 .

[20]  James E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Track misperceptions and frustrated college plans: an analysis of the effects of tracks and track perceptions in the National Longitudinal Survey , 1980 .

[21]  Kenneth A. Sirotnik,et al.  What You See Is What You Get--Consistency, Persistency, and Mediocrity in Classrooms. , 1983 .

[22]  Evelyn R. Rosenthal,et al.  Class and merit in the American high school: An assessment of the revisionist and meritocratic arguments , 1978 .

[23]  L. Darling-Hammond.  Equality and Excellence: The Educational Status of Black Americans. , 1985 .

[24]  Phillip C. Schlechty,et al.  The Structure and Process in Secondary Schools: The Academic Impact of Educational Climates. , 1975 .

[25]  J. Rosenbaum.  Making inequality: The hidden curriculum of high school tracking , 1976 .

[26]  P. Berman.  The Next Step: The Minnesota Plan. , 1985 .

[27]  L. Cronbach.  Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. , 1975 .

[28]  James R. Squire,et al.  National Study of High School English Programs: A Record of English Teaching Today, A School For All Seasons. , 1966 .

[29]  J. Oakes.  Tracking and Ability Grouping in American Schools: Some Constitutional Questions , 1983, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[30]  H. Gintis,et al.  Schooling in Capitalist America , 1976 .

[31]  N. Webb.  Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. , 1982 .

[32]  Raymond E. Callahan.  Education and the Cult of Efficiency , 1962 .

[33]  M. Adler.  The Paideia Program , 1982 .

[34]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Ability Grouping on Secondary School Students: A Meta-analysis of Evaluation Findings , 1981 .

[35]  K. Alexander,et al.  Curriculum Tracking and Educational Stratification: Some Further Evidence. , 1977 .

[36]  Tom Belinoski.  Classrooms and Corridors: The Crisis of Authority in Desegregated Secondary Schools by Mary Haywood Metz. Berkeley, Ca.: University of California Press, 1978. 286 pp , 1981 .

[37]  J. Shea,et al.  Vocational education and training : impact on youth : a technical report for the Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education , 1979 .

[38]  C. Evertson.  Differences in Instructional Activities in High and Low Achieving Junior High Classes. R&D Report Number 6106. , 1980 .

[39]  H. Borko.  Teachers' Decisions in the Planning of Reading Instruction. , 1981 .

[40]  K. Alexander,et al.  Selection and Allocation Within Schools: Some Causes and Consequences of Curriculum Placement. , 1976 .

[41]  J. Amato.  Social class discrimination in the schooling process: Myth and reality , 1980 .

[42]  R. Slavin,et al.  Mainstreaming Students with Mild Handicaps: Academic and Social Outcomes , 1983 .

[43]  J. Oakes.  Tracking, Inequality, and the Rhetoric of Reform: Why Schools Don't Change , 1986 .

[44]  Adam Gamoran,et al.  The Stratification of High School Learning Opportunities. , 1987 .

[45]  Theresa Koontz Noland,et al.  The Effects of Ability Grouping: A Meta-Analysis of Research Findings. , 1986 .