Estimation of fracture properties for high strength and ultra high strength concrete beams and size effect

This article presents the details of estimation of fracture parameters for high strength concrete (HSC, HSC1) and ultra high strength concrete (UHSC). Brief details about characterization of ingredients of HSC, HSC1 and UHSC have been provided. Experiments have been carried out on beams made up of HSC, HSC1 and UHSC considering various sizes and notch depths. Fracture characteristics such as size independent fracture energy (Gf), size of fracture process zone (Cf), fracture toughness (KIC) and crack tip opening displacement (CTODc) have been estimated based on the experimental observations. From the studies, it is observed that (i) UHSC has high fracture energy and ductility inspite of having a very low value of Cf; (ii) relatively much more homogeneous than other concretes, because of absence of coarse aggregates and well-graded smaller size particles; (iii) the critical SIF (KIC) values are increasing with increase of beam depth and decreasing with increase of notch depth. Generally, it can be noted that there is significant increase in fracture toughness and CTODc. They are about 7 times in HSC1 and about 10 times in UHSC compared to those in HSC; (iv) for notch-to-depth ratio 0.1, Bazant’s size effect model slightly overestimates the maximum failure loads compared to experimental observations and Karihaloo’s model slightly underestimates the maximum failure loads. For the notch-to-depth ratio ranging from 0.2 to 0.4 for the case of UHSC, it can be observed that, both the size effect models predict more or less similar maximum failure loads compared to corresponding experimental values.

[1]  Lei Liang,et al.  Fatigue properties of RPC under cyclic loads of single-stage and multi-level amplitude , 2010 .

[2]  Halit Yazici,et al.  Mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete containing mineral admixtures under different curing regimes , 2009 .

[3]  Sangmok Han,et al.  Direct tension and fracture resistance curves of ultra high performance marine composite materials , 2008 .

[4]  N. Shrive,et al.  Optimization of Mechanical Properties and Durability of Reactive Powder Concrete , 2006 .

[5]  Y. Chan,et al.  Effect of silica fume on steel fiber bond characteristics in reactive powder concrete , 2004 .

[6]  U. Sanna,et al.  High Pressure Steam Curing of Reactive-Powder Mortars , 2001, "SP-200: Fifth CANMET/ACI Conference on Recent Advances in Concrete Technology-Proceeding, Fifth International Conference".

[7]  Per Goltermann,et al.  Packing of aggregates : An alternative tool to determine the optimal aggregate mix , 1997 .

[8]  P. Richard,et al.  Composition of reactive powder concretes , 1995 .

[9]  P. Richard,et al.  Reactive Powder Concretes With High Ductility and 200 - 800 Mpa Compressive Strength , 1994, "SP-144: Concrete Technology: Past, Present, and Future".

[10]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Determination of Fracture Energy from Size Effect and Brittleness Number , 1987 .

[11]  Z. Bažant Size Effect in Blunt Fracture: Concrete, Rock, Metal , 1984 .

[12]  C. Chiu,et al.  A preliminary study of reactive powder concrete as a new repair material , 2007 .

[13]  Ming-Gin Lee,et al.  ULTRA-HIGH STRENGTH STEEL FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE FOR STRENGTHENING OF RC FRAMES , 2007 .

[14]  Bhushan Lal Karihaloo,et al.  Size effect in shallow and deep notched quasi-brittle structures , 1999 .

[15]  B. Karihaloo Fracture mechanics and structural concrete , 1995 .

[16]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  A Fracture toughness criterion for concrete , 1985 .