Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency measurement using data envelopment analysis: A review

This paper presents a review on the development of efficiency measurement approaches incorporating undesirable outputs in the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) framework. The review is based on the literature analysis in DEA with the classification of the literature in two orientations - a methodological orientation and an empirical orientation. For the methodological orientation, two categories of direct and indirect approaches have been discussed extensively. As for the empirical orientation, the discussion brings up some empirical studies relating to environmental efficiency measurement.

[1]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Separating Market Efficiency from Profitability and its Implications for Planning , 1995 .

[2]  Yiwen Bian Efficiency Evaluation with Undesirable Factors Based on DEA , 2008, 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[3]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Translation Invariance in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2015 .

[4]  Barış K. Yörük,et al.  International regulations and environmental performance , 2008 .

[5]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With Dea-Solver Software and References , 2005 .

[6]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Ecological total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China , 2012 .

[7]  W. Cooper,et al.  RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA , 1999 .

[8]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Holger Scheel,et al.  Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  William L. Weber,et al.  A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs , 2010 .

[11]  O. H. Brownlee,et al.  ACTIVITY ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTION AND ALLOCATION , 1952 .

[12]  Joe Zhu Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Structure , 1996 .

[13]  F. Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Directional distance functions and environmental regulation , 2005 .

[14]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[15]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[16]  Jie Wu,et al.  Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review , 2012 .

[17]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Should the US clean air act include CO2 emission control?: Examination by data envelopment analysis , 2010 .

[18]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Methodological comparison between two unified (operational and environmental) efficiency measurements for environmental assessment , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Emissions Trading and Profitability: The Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry , 1998 .

[21]  Wen-Min Lu,et al.  A closer look at the economic-environmental disparities for regional development in China , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  William L. Weber,et al.  Does Environmental Protection Lead to Slower Productivity Growth in the Chemical Industry? , 2004 .

[24]  William L. Weber,et al.  Shadow prices and pollution costs in U.S. agriculture , 2006 .

[25]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation , 2011 .

[26]  D. Luenberger Benefit functions and duality , 1992 .

[27]  Don R. Hansen,et al.  Ecoefficiency: Defining a role for environmental cost management , 2008 .

[28]  Hui Wang,et al.  Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[30]  Simanti Banerjee,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Technical Efficiency: A Data Envelopment Analysis for Indian Cement Industry ∂ , 2007 .

[31]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  DEA with Undesirable Factors , 2007 .

[32]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Implementing stricter environmental regulation to enhance eco-efficiency and sustainability: a case study of Shandong Province’s pulp and paper industry, China , 2011 .

[33]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  On the Measurement of the Environmental Performance of Firms— A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective , 1996 .

[34]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  Linear Programming Models for the Measurement of Environmental Performance of Firms—Concepts and Empirical Results , 1997 .

[35]  Giorgia Oggioni,et al.  Efficiency analysis of world cement industry in presence of undesirable output: Application of data envelopment analysis and directional distance function , 2012 .

[36]  Osman Zaim,et al.  The role of international trade on environmental efficiency: a DEA approach , 2001 .

[37]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Diego Prior,et al.  Environmental externalities and efficiency measurement. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[39]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: An extended DEA approach , 2007 .

[40]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Negative data in DEA: a directional distance approach applied to bank branches , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[41]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[42]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Environmental Efficiency Measurement with Translog Distance Functions: A Parametric Approach , 2009 .

[43]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[44]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance , 2006 .

[45]  F. Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Efficiency and Environmental Regulation , 2000 .

[46]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[47]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[48]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental Performance : an Index Number Approach , 2004 .

[49]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Measuring the cost of environmentally sustainable industrial development in India: a distance function approach , 2002, Environment and Development Economics.

[50]  G. Boyd,et al.  Plant Level Productivity, Efficiency, and Environmental Performance of the Container Glass Industry , 2002 .

[51]  Sabuj Kumar Mandal,et al.  Environmental efficiency of the Indian cement industry: An interstate analysis , 2010 .

[52]  Joachim Gassen,et al.  Accounting, Organizations and Society , 2013 .

[53]  G. Boyd,et al.  Estimating the linkage between energy efficiency and productivity , 2000 .

[54]  Kjetil Telle,et al.  Do environmental regulations hamper productivity growth? How accounting for improvements of plants' environmental performance can change the conclusion , 2007 .

[55]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[56]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Environmental regulation, productive efficiency and cost of pollution abatement: a case study of the sugar industry in India. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[57]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies , 2010 .