Computational Biology Methods for Characterization of Pluripotent Cells.

Pluripotent cells are a powerful tool for regenerative medicine and drug discovery. Several techniques have been developed to induce pluripotency, or to extract pluripotent cells from different tissues and biological fluids. However, the characterization of pluripotency requires tedious, expensive, time-consuming, and not always reliable wet-lab experiments; thus, an easy, standard quality-control protocol of pluripotency assessment remains to be established. Here to help comes the use of high-throughput techniques, and in particular, the employment of gene expression microarrays, which has become a complementary technique for cellular characterization. Research has shown that the transcriptomics comparison with an Embryonic Stem Cell (ESC) of reference is a good approach to assess the pluripotency. Under the premise that the best protocol is a computer software source code, here I propose and explain line by line a software protocol coded in R-Bioconductor for pluripotency assessment based on the comparison of transcriptomics data of pluripotent cells with an ESC of reference. I provide advice for experimental design, warning about possible pitfalls, and guides for results interpretation.

[1]  R. McKay,et al.  New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells , 2007, Nature.

[2]  A. Smith,et al.  Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men. , 2001, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[3]  H. Redl,et al.  Vitamin C enhances the generation of mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[4]  Alessandra Giorgetti,et al.  Identification of a specific reprogramming-associated epigenetic signature in human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  M. Pellegrini,et al.  Molecular analyses of human induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[6]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells , 2007, Nature.

[7]  Hidenori Akutsu,et al.  A small-molecule inhibitor of tgf-Beta signaling replaces sox2 in reprogramming by inducing nanog. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[8]  Richard A Young,et al.  Chromatin structure and gene expression programs of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[9]  Yuriy L. Orlov,et al.  Tbx3 improves the germ-line competency of induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.

[10]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from neural stem cells , 2009, Nature Protocols.

[11]  Marcos J. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Oct4-Induced Pluripotency in Adult Neural Stem Cells , 2009, Cell.

[12]  Mike J. Mason,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[13]  M. Ko,et al.  Zscan4 transiently reactivates early embryonic genes during the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[14]  J. Nichols,et al.  Naive and primed pluripotent states. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[15]  Yoshifumi Kawamura,et al.  Direct reprogramming of somatic cells is promoted by maternal transcription factor Glis1 , 2011, Nature.

[16]  H. Schöler,et al.  Reprogramming fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells with Bmi1 , 2011, Cell Research.

[17]  Michael J. Ziller,et al.  Reference Maps of Human ES and iPS Cell Variation Enable High-Throughput Characterization of Pluripotent Cell Lines , 2011, Cell.

[18]  M. Bonin,et al.  Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult human testis , 2008, Nature.

[19]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[20]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Conversion of adult mouse unipotent germline stem cells into pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature Protocols.

[21]  Jing Chen,et al.  BMPs functionally replace Klf4 and support efficient reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts by Oct4 alone , 2011, Cell Research.

[22]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Concise Review: Challenging the Pluripotency of Human Testis‐Derived ESC‐like Cells , 2011, Stem cells.

[23]  M. Trotter,et al.  Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos , 2007, Nature.

[24]  H. Schöler,et al.  Induction of pluripotency in adult unipotent germline stem cells. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[25]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors , 2008, Nature.

[26]  Yuriy L Orlov,et al.  The nuclear receptor Nr5a2 can replace Oct4 in the reprogramming of murine somatic cells to pluripotent cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[27]  Thomas Lufkin,et al.  Reprogramming of fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells with orphan nuclear receptor Esrrb , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[28]  T. Speed,et al.  Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Brief Report: Evaluating the Potential of Putative Pluripotent Cells Derived from Human Testis , 2011, Stem cells.

[30]  G. Daley,et al.  Live cell imaging distinguishes bona fide human iPS cells from partially reprogrammed cells , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  Marcos J. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Chromatin-Remodeling Components of the BAF Complex Facilitate Reprogramming , 2010, Cell.

[32]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Induction of pluripotency in human cord blood unrestricted somatic stem cells. , 2010, Experimental hematology.

[33]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Human adult germline stem cells in question , 2010, Nature.

[34]  Roger A. Pedersen,et al.  Early Cell Fate Decisions of Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Mouse Epiblast Stem Cells Are Controlled by the Same Signalling Pathways , 2009, PloS one.

[35]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Epiblast Stem Cell Subpopulations Represent Mouse Embryos of Distinct Pregastrulation Stages , 2010, Cell.

[36]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Autologous Pluripotent Stem Cells Generated from Adult Mouse Testicular Biopsy , 2011, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.

[37]  Qi Zhou,et al.  iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation , 2009, Nature.

[38]  J. Thomson,et al.  Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. , 1998, Science.

[39]  Marcos J. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Direct reprogramming of human neural stem cells by OCT4 , 2009, Nature.

[40]  R. Stewart,et al.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells , 2007, Science.

[41]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Generation of Parthenogenetic Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Parthenogenetic Neural Stem Cells , 2009, Stem cells.

[42]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Kdm2b promotes induced pluripotent stem cell generation by facilitating gene activation early in reprogramming , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[43]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into epiblast stem cells , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[44]  Shaorong Gao,et al.  Viable mice produced from three-factor induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells through tetraploid complementation , 2011, Cell Research.

[45]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Disclosing the crosstalk among DNA methylation, transcription factors, and histone marks in human pluripotent cells through discovery of DNA methylation motifs , 2013, Genome research.

[46]  J. Nichols,et al.  Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency , 2009, Development.